|
Depends on the rifle I suppose. Bows are silent but rifles can be fitter with suppresors. They have
a greater rate of fier, do more damage and are generally more acurate. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
If your going for distance, rifles are better, but bows are more silent, and don't scare everything
for miles. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I am not a hunter, and this is probably a stereotype, but as far as I know, rifles are a bit more
powerful than rifles or other guns. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
For the boring, ordinary man, yes.
Bow-men are something special now. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No because there is little space left where hunters can avoid hitting houses. My Mom had a bullet
fly right by her, ricochet off her chimney and then hit the fence post and damage it. Hunters
should not be allowed to use high-powered guns at all. In my opinion, it takes the sport right out
of it and just makes it less challenging. It takes real skill to use a bow. With the guns they
have now days, it's just a matter of being a good aim. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
04 Apr 2008 03:14
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
