 |
|
|
 |
| Individuals Who Don't Pay Taxes, Have No "right" To Vote. |
| Since the definition of rights has become quite ambiguous and cloudy, i.e. Positive rights, economic rights, negative rights, political rights, human rights, etc etc.; I would like to remove the right to vote if one does not pay taxes. It seems quite obvious where the cultural path will ultimately lead when those who don't produce can take from those who do, by a simple vote on a ballot. |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
Back to the days of the Land Owners when the country first started who were only allowed to vote.
Do you really want that? I don't think so. So basically if you lose your job, you lose the right
to vote until you get rehired?
How do you manage that? That would take so much resources to keep track of that.
I think it is an underhanded attempt to attack people perceived as don't work or are lazy. CODE
WORDS. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Democracys point is all should be allowed the vote. Say your unemployed due to lack of opportunity
or jobs, you have the right to cast a vote for the guy who says he'll get you jobs.
Mind you, thats how Hitler got in.
If the unemployed can't vote, possibly the full point of democrays lost. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
So basically you want to take from the poor and give to the rich. How elitist of you. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
That statement is too broad. There are people who have been productive members of society, but due
to some situation beyond their control, may not be working at election time. There are also
housewives who do work hard to maintain a home and raise their children. How about those who are in
wheel chairs due to tragic accident, yet have fully functional minds and who have been well
educated and want to contribute more to society, but cannot because of the restrictions of their
disability? I just named a few possible reasons why someone may be out of work and not paying
taxes. There are some people who probably shouldn't vote, but I don't think that we can assume that
all people who are not working are going to vote in such a way that would be uneducated and of sole
benefit to themselves...I'm assuming that you are suggesting that they would vote for someone who
promoted welfare or some other form of public assistance. Had you worded your debate a bit
differently, I may have seen your point as a valid one, but to generalize that way is not something
that anyone can do about any group of people. It is evident in many other debates and I think the
same applies here. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
For and Against Recent Activity
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|