|
This could be considered evidence for evolution in some particular ways. However, it’s not
presumably a very strong piece of evidence. Plus, the theory of evolution really doesn't need this
piece of evidence in its support anyway. It’s already gotten far more credible confirmations. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Like to the others who that there is a such as *evolution* PA-LEAZE EXPLAIN your idea on the how the
cambrian erosion came to effect. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Evolution refers to genes, and I'm pretty sure there aren't genes that control our thoughts.
Increased tolerance just means that we are smart and learn from the past. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
You presume increased human tolerance, but I have not seen any actual proof that there is an
increase.
I would say that you need to prove that there is such tolerance. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It does seem to me that the theory of social evolution is at odds with Darwinian evolution. Where
the evolution of morality is actually the suppression of our instincts. Morality goes contrary to
survival of the fittest and natural selection. It may very well be a theory of societal evolution,
but does it then cancel out Darwinian evolution? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Morals haven't grown one bit. The last century was bloodier than all the preceding centuries
combined, and the "me generation" is sunk in the swamp of the Self. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Tolerance is cultural. Evolution is biological. The two are not the same. That's a good thing
though. Cultural "evolution" occurs at a much faster rate than natural evolution. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
21 Apr 2008 19:00
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
