» Home » Family
Incest Is Not Evil, It Is Merely Disapproved Of Because A Child Born Of An Incestuous Relationship Would Have An Increased Risk Of Inheriting A Genetic Disease.
It was never considered wrong in the past. It is not a crime in France, Belgium, Japan and some other countries. However, in the UK and the US it breaches laws and social taboos.
 ibanex_87  06 May 2008 18:03
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
What's the problem with it? Other than the increased chance of genetic disease (which the poster pointed out), there's no actual issues beyond social taboos. And the increased chance of genetic disease can be countered by screening. Both partners can be checked for the possibility of passing on a disease, and then they can have an embryo implanted that doesn't have the genetic disease. Or they can just not have kids.

The issue of morality is entirely a matter of opinion. You don't see many people dating their sister or brother or aunt or uncle or parent or grandparent or cousin, so you think it's abnormal. You're told by your parents, your society, and your religion that it's a sin, so you say it is. But it's all a social thing. To one group, incest is a sin. To another, it's no big deal and nothing to get worked up about. Who are you to say that one's correct and another's wrong? Majority rules? The minority (the incestuous and their allies) are wrong and abnormal and should be put down? Whichever side your on is automatically correct, no question?

Life doesn't work like that. The only things that can truly be described as evil are hating someone for being different and doing something without the affected's consent, unless they took away the consent of another and you're not going with vigilante justice.

If it's a consensual relationship between two humans, what's the problem?
 
 FoxFire  09 May 2008 21:22
 Add a Comment
 
 
I can't say it's ever been described as evil in my knowledge. It still happens in rural areas. Not only is there the health issue, but it breaches the social boundaries too. It's become something of a taboo, and that is what provokes people into dismissing it. Though, I do have to say, intercourse with a sibling or family member is too horrific for me to contemplate lol.
 
 Jakers  06 May 2008 18:07
 3 Comments
 
 Gross. I'm telling your mum.
by  Anti_hero
 06 May 2008 18:10
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Wrong! While the prevalence and severity of child abuse in the United States has been given an increasing amount of attention -- attitudes, definitions and statistics continue to vary. The examination of incest may incite some of the greatest discrepancies, for it remains one of the most under-reported and least discussed crimes in our nation. An almost international taboo, incest often remains concealed by the victim because of guilt, shame, fear, social and familial pressure, as well as coercion by the abuser (Matsakis, 1991).
 
 menhim1967  08 Jan 2009 18:37
 Add a Comment
 
 
I think that incest is wrong on all levels. There is a difference between loving your family and actually having sexual relations with them. Most of the time, incest is forced, meaning rape, molestation or pedophelia. All of which I feel are wrong.

I'm glad that the societal veiws in Canada, UK and US share my views on these practices. I believe that anyone who commits the above mention acts should be put to death!
 
 SlyOne  22 Nov 2008 06:33
 Add a Comment
 
 
No comment its just not right morally
 
 blazer1968  06 May 2008 22:50
 1 Comment
 
 Define 'morally'. Decided by your morals, my morals, or by the morals of some random third person who agrees with neither of us? Or should we all just assume that anyone who's not in the majority is inferior, evil, just plain wrong, and morally incorrect?
by  FoxFire
 09 May 2008 21:24
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
It's wrong. You can't be so horribly confused that you would consider reproducing with someone of the same bloodline. It's well known that not even animals commit incest (as they know it will create genetic problems)
 
 Anti_hero  06 May 2008 18:06
 1 Comment
 
 If there weren't any genetic problems with incest, would you be so against it?

Because it's completely possible to reduce or entirely eliminate the risk of genetic problems arrising from incest (don't have kids, adopt, IVF, genetic screening of the partners for diseases and other deffects, etc)
by  FoxFire
 16 May 2008 21:21
Comment
  
Comment
  
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Pinching Loafs On The Lawn Is NOT Cool!
All Teens Are Self-centered
Family Member Should Not Be Encouraged To Stay Illegally
People Should Name Their Kids Easy Names So That Teachers Can Pronounce Them.
Kids Should Wear Helmets When Riding A Bicycle
People Are Far Too Concerned About Finding Their Biological Parents.
If Your Under Age It Should Be Legal To Have Kids In Your Custody
Parents Should Be Punished For Their Teenager's Crimes
Incest Between Consenting Adults
A Step Mother Can Not Sign Legal Documents For A Step Child And Leave The Mother Out
New Debates
World Government Is Inevitable.
All Dogs Should Be Allowed In Stores
Porn Industry Now Asking For A Bailout!
It Is OK For Every Lady To Have A Different Body Shape
Kung Fu Is The Best Martial Art In The World
Study In A Good University Is Too Expensive
Zola Was A Very Good Writer
Israel's Attitude Is Right Nowadays
Money Is The Cause Of Wars All Over The World
Facebook Is A Waste Of Time