|
|
 |
|
Can not agree with your assertions. The act of incest is an act of depravity. There should be no
reason for family members to copulate.Fornication is for horny little toads. Sexual intercourse is
done to produce children and not simply to get your rocks off. Liberal attitudes of free
contraception and lunchtime abortions have led to this? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No. Incest is wicked, immoral, and degrading to the entire human species. Absolutely no. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Incest between anyone is just disgusting ....... Who would want to have sex with their brother or
sister...mom or dad........ewwwwww..... |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Simply sick. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I don't agree with it. It isn't fair to any children who are born into an incestuous relationship.
They're the ones that will have to suffer when they are bullied at school. There is also the risk of
the child being ill.
I understand situations where relatives who have only just met each other engage in an incestuous
relationship, but I completely disagree with children being involved and believe that once a person
does find out they are related to someone they are having a relationship with, they should end it. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
We need to define how close is the familial relationship between the partners.
I don’t think consensual incest really exists, at least not between parent and child, even if the
child is an adult.
Incest is all about power, and little about sex. Even if the child doesn’t perceive it as wrong,
the responsible partner -- the adult -- has no right to force himself on a daughter (or, more
commonly, stepdaughter). It is a question of innocence.
I would also argue that even as adults, the father-daughter power balance ultimately puts the
consenting woman in a non-consensual position.
As for having sex with your long-estranged sister, that’s acceptable -- until you find out your
real relationship. The birth-defect argument is now germane
However, historically, many royal brothers and sisters had to marry to keep the royal bloodlines
pure. This may be why Czar Nicholas’ son was a hemophiliac. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No that could lead to birth defects in their children. And that is disgusting b/c they are related
by blood |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Incest is sick. No person of any age should have sexual relations with relatives. They should make
the laws a lot stronger in regards to incest. If a child is born between two parents, they risk
having a life of confusion and ridicule. People will laugh at them. They also run the risk of having
DNA related illnesses. Incest is not a good thing. It is sick, immoral, and against the laws of
nature. If you cannot find a lover outside of your family, then maybe you should not have a lover in
the first place. Incest is a sin and should be punishable by law. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Maybe you're looking to pork your sister or cousin, but try to keep it to yourself.
In nature, animals instinctively know not to commit incest and will only do so when the breeding
population is so small that there is no other choice. |
| |
 K9  29 Apr 2008 15:45
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
For a start, it is a scientific fact that people who are related are not meant to engage in sexual
relations.
Even if contraception is used, accidents do happen and how do you think a child would feel growing
up knowing that there mum is also their sister of however it was?
As for the abortions... What kind of society are we creating if we are just encouraging abortions or
giving more reasons for people to have them? |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
