|
In an evolutionary sense (I assume we're speaking of the physical human while discounting any
relevence of that which sets humans apart from all other things we know of in the universe) humans
are all but absolutely irrelevent.
The window that is allowing humans to live on this planet is quite small. The earth goes through
cataclysmic changes that do not allow sustaining of human life.
Even if a few humans found ways to sustain themselves through those inevitable changes, the earth
itself will lose the engine that sustains it. Then there's the sun inevitably going through it's
changes which will end all pretention on this planet.
So humans have to get off this planet. Problem is, the universe is an extremely violent place where
changes can instantly change entire galaxies. Those changes can come from very far distances and
arrive in a matter of seconds.
But even though humans don't live 2 centuries, and even though everything they know of ends (for
all practical purposes), they have the unique influx of possibilty. The odds don't matter. They
always have the slightest portion of an odd.
So, even though their physical reality is all but absolutely irrelevant, they cling to it's
relevence. They call it reality. They actually argue about it in an effort to enforce it's
reality.
They will even say that irrelevance can be reality. Heck, they will even argue to support that
argument. Lol
Happens all the time on here. I find it downright hilarious. At least it produces real comedy. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Sure. It's our own hubris when we declare ourselves at the top of the evolutionary pyramid anyway.
Based on what standard? Insects for example are greater in number, variety, total biomass, and
adaptability, and many can kill or incapacitate us with ease. And of course nature can shake things
up at any time for any living creatures. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
We could be. We are too much a plague upon the face of the earth. It has caused too much damage on
earth. Too much an impact to be irrelevant and eliminating many of the animals. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
What is the relevance of evolution? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
In an evolutionary sense, humans are quite relevant as of this point in time. We possess the
capability to influence not only our environment but the state of our entire planet along with the
condition of every living organism on it (a feat no other species on Earth has ever come close to
accomplishing). Fairly soon, within a matter of decades most likely, that level of influence will
grow to encompass the conditions of other planets and celestial bodies within our solar system.
Think about the amount of technological advances that took place from the 1900s to the year 2000.
Now, picture that type of drastic change in technology happening again within the next century and
the one after it. It’s not going to stop unless we become extinct. As technology rises, our
influence on Earth, on this solar system, on this universe, will continue to increase along with it.
And as our influence of said things expands, so will the human species. To other planets, moons,
solar systems, and maybe even galaxies. I don’t know about you, but from an evolutionary
standpoint, that’s quite an achievement considering the fact that the biological goal of all life
is to reproduce in order to sustain the species. So, if we're judging the relevance of people by
looking through the eyes of evolution, I disagree with the debate. Though we’ve only been on this
planet for a short period of time, humans play far too great a role on this planet for them to be
irrelevant from an evolutionary perspective. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Evolution is a lie, if things happen it is because God is allowing them to happen. There is no
evolution, it is a made up idea to get thick people like you to follow it. You are irrelevant for
being a queer, non christian and a believer in evolution, same goes for the rest that are like you. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
26 Sep 2009 10:44
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
