|
|
 |
|
No because it takes a good amount of knowledge to have a good imagination. How many fictional
authors do you know that are stupid? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
They both suck without the other. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
I fully respect the value of imagination but it's just not accurate to say it is "more important
than knowledge". Neither concept is sufficient by itself to survive. There are outright crazy
people overflowing with imagination who otherwise have no idea how to take care of themselves.
Likewise there are people who just do what they were told and taught all there life and essentially
use no imagination at all yet they survive and thrive. Really a human needs a mix of both.
Saying imagination is more important than knowledge is like saying gourmet cuisine is more important
to know than basic cooking skills. And yes, there did have to be somebody one upon a time who first
tasted a food or devised a recipe, but that doesn't mean that fist discovery is more important than
the basic act of cooking and eating millions will do to survive. Plus eventually that creative
discovery will be so commonplace it is long forgotten as anything creative and will simply be called
knowledge. In fact in essence you're saying that new recent imagination is more important than
older imagination. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|