|
Its logical cos its the age when you are legally and adult even though there are different ages when
you are allowed to drive and have sex.what's the point in calling something an adult price if they
are not legally seen as an adult. Its stupid and there should be more of a cut off point between
when you are an adult and a child. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Well, you make a logical point. Of course there are some teens just as large if not larger than
most adults so whatever activity they are entering into they will use as much space or energy as an
adult. But you're right that if you don't have the privileges of an adult you shouldn't be
classified as an adult when it's time to pay.
Maybe the fairer thing to do would be to charge by the pound (ha ha). We'll all step on a scale,
then for infants we'll pay next to nothing and for larger teens and adults they'll pay a lot - to
compensate for the space and energy needed to accommodate them on rides. Sound fairer? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I wish i didn't have to pay at all. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
At the least lower the age to sixteen (the age most teens are actually able to find work), so that
people twelve (the lowest age I've ever seen people charged as an adult for) to sixteen aren't
disadvantaged.
Most kids between those ages don't make nearly as much money as kids sixteen and older, so it's not
fair to limit their ability to go to the movies or the amusement park without financial aid from
their parents. Most thirteen to sixteen year olds have trouble getting a job that pays better than
babysitting (and, of course, girls are way more likely to get the job, so that means guys have to
turn elsewhere), and can't easily afford to be going everywhere paying adult prices for things.
Ya, I'd say old enough to be hired for a job is a good threshold. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I agree, it bothers me too sometimes. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
10 Aug 2008 02:24
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
