» Home » Miscellaneous
If You Are In Favor Of Allowing Women To Abort Their Children Before They're Born, You Should Also Be In Favor Of Women Killing The Child After It Is Born.
Why not? It's the same "blob of tissue" that was inside the mother, so there is no reason to be for one and not the other.
 Mark  21 May 2008 00:48
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
Sure kill anything that moves, if you can get away with it.
Isn’t it a wonderful amazing world?
 
 v00v  08 Jan 2009 03:46
 Add a Comment
 
 
Unless someone can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that life does not begin at conception, then I have to agree with you. There is no difference in killing a baby or killing a fetus. Both is murder.
 
 pusspuss  21 May 2008 18:05
 Add a Comment
 
 
We need to just make everyone sterile so we don't have to worry about these stupid issues anymore. Also everyone has an ability to die so it does not matter if they're in a womb, out of one or 60 years old.
 
 nath0610  21 May 2008 17:53
 Add a Comment
 
 
All though both actions are wrong, your logic is correct--there is no substantial difference between a fetus and a new born or an infant or a toddler or a child for that matter.
 
 charlee  21 May 2008 16:31
 2 Comments
 
 Isn't it weird that you're always the only one that agrees with me?
by  Mark
 21 May 2008 16:54
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
I disagree for the most part...up until a certain point. I believe it's okay to abort up until the fetus begins developing a nervous system and other organs. THEN a woman should keep it because that's when it resembles a baby the most.
 
 Starburst  11 Dec 2008 05:07
 Add a Comment
 
 
"If you don't believe in abortion, then don't have one". That sums it up pretty nicely. Unfortunately, those who want to control us and make us be, think and live exactly like them will never stop.
 
 Melissa_A  01 Jul 2008 22:33
 Add a Comment
 
 
That already happens, godbot.

It's called the "death penalty".
 
 K9  21 May 2008 14:27
 1 Comment
 
 K9 with the sickest burns around. (Y)
by  Snipex
 24 May 2008 11:53
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
The baby won't be conscious of it if it's early enough ; but within a few weeks of the birth or after birth, it shouldn't be allowed.

Stop trying to convert us, Mark :P
 
 Snipex  21 May 2008 12:52
 3 Comments
 
 You need to see the film "Silent Scream". It shows a fetus trying to get away from the instrument about to destroy it. After viewing this, a large number of doctors stopped performing abortions.
by  pusspuss
 21 May 2008 17:59
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I really don't think you should have a say in this unless you are a woman.
Once you actually deal with the decision of aborting the baby or not, morals may change last minute.
And I am sure woman who have aborted their children was done in their, and the babies best interest.
 
 helenbobby  21 May 2008 11:21
 2 Comments
 
 The man should definitely have a say. He was in on the making of the baby, unless the pregnancy was by immaculate conception. The baby is as much the man's as it is the woman's.
by  pusspuss
 21 May 2008 18:02
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Women should not be allowed to do either unless giving birth would kill the woman or the in case of rape
 
 Poshboy171  21 May 2008 11:05
 Add a Comment
 
 
That blob of tissue is now self aware, and conscious, so no, that would be murder,
i agree that the limit should be pushed down to 22 weeks, and the reason premature born infants are living is due to the increasing technology, not nature, so if we take it in a naturist way, we shouldn't put children in incubators, or give them breathing aid, because it goes against nature and most importantly of all to a scary amount of people, GOD... If there is one.

It is a stupid motion,

you're not a woman, you do not understand the sacrifice we have to go through for a child, and if the child is not desired, to put your life on hold for nine months is a ridiculous motion.

I do not like the thought of abortion, and personally would never have one, but i am pro choice.
 
 martlamb  21 May 2008 09:14
 2 Comments
 
 Why wouldn't you have an abortion?
by  charlee
 21 May 2008 16:48
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Alcohol Is Worse Than Marijuana
Rationalism Is Better Than Empiricism
Club Penguin Is The Best Website
I Am Not The Only One Who Has Responded To Someone Else In My Own Shoutbox By Mistake.
True Miracles Don't Happen Today Because We Now Have Ways Of Explaining Them Or Proving Them To Be False...
U.S. Geological Survey Estimates 3.65 BILLION BARRELS Of OIL!!
You Should Have To Pass A Test To Drive A Motorized Buggy
We Are Slowly Running Out Of Any Decent Debates To Have On This Site.
Most Debates Should Be Generalized.
Cster Is A Big Meanie!
New Debates
World Government Is Inevitable.
All Dogs Should Be Allowed In Stores
Porn Industry Now Asking For A Bailout!
It Is OK For Every Lady To Have A Different Body Shape
Kung Fu Is The Best Martial Art In The World
Study In A Good University Is Too Expensive
Zola Was A Very Good Writer
Israel's Attitude Is Right Nowadays
Money Is The Cause Of Wars All Over The World
Facebook Is A Waste Of Time