|
It would be like rome because it would have to happen though a long conquest with bloody battles to
eliminate infighting, constitution like the declaration of independence, and fair laws. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
A very good idea but ONLY if this new world government is absolutely incorruptible, perfectly honest
and "in the middle", not left not right.
Representation form each and every country would have to be a democratic process : No heirs, kings
or dictators.
The Constitution would have to be approved democratically, by referendum, with a 66% majority or
more.
Elected officials would serve 4- or 5-year terms, no more.
Etc.
An utopian project, if you ask me for my opinion... |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
That is exactly what has to be done. Of course there will be conflicts, but in the long run this
courageous move would be the solution for World Peace. The unfortunate side would be the greed that
is already present in our society. There are people that would feel there losing out, but I feel in
time it would work out. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Although this may seem to be a dream of an ideal world, if this government was established, all of
humanity would benefit. There would be much less(if any) wars and it would pave the way to a
brighter future for humanity. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
No.
There should be as many Sovereign Nations as possible, with Independent Currencies and Armies to
defend the Motherland.
And all citizens having guns with which to defend themselves. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
You MUST be joking. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
But there's always a war going on and we cant stop that |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
However, the odds of all muslims, christians, jews, satanists, and all of the other religions
getting together and accepting one universal belief is so incredibly unlikely. And, if all nations
came together, an argument would be sparked about something, and division would occur all over
again. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
No this would be much like a totalitarian state that governed the entire world. In addition, this
would lead to world wars if anything as the politics of the whole world would be controlled by a
single party, and inevitably there would be disagreements about topics such as nuclear weapons,
territory and military force. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|