|
|
 |
|
The truth is...they shouldn't need government protection...we causing there numbers to rise and
fall...just like every other animal out there...and were going to kill them because of it.,,what
will happen when humans over populate the earth? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
And maybe the population of humans should be reduced....including you |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
The fishing population is not affected. There are plenty of fish in the sea. You just gotta know
where to fish. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Sealions have been protected by the government for quite a long time. Thus now it is said that the
presence of sealions and their increase in population is causing problems to the population of
fishes adversely. And for such a reason they should be hunted down in order to maintain a balance
between the sealions and other fishes. But whatever may be the reason killing of any animal or
mammals should not be appreciated and thus the government should think of some other alternative to
save sealions in such a way so that they do not cause any problem to any other fishes. The
government should not accept the procedure of killing the sealions in order to save the population
of fishes in the water. Hunting these sealions is no less than killing them and killing can never be
a solution to save something. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
There is obviously a reason why they are being protected by the government. It because they were in
dangered! So why reduce the population of the sea lions...that's just wrong. We need to worry about
the more important things..what about the over population in Russia, and taiwan, and the middle east
etc...?? Should we move some of them because the more and more that the population goes up the
higher the poverty rates increase....and there already through the roof...!! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Ah yes. The great culling debate. Until sealions threaten Homo Sapien Sapiens directly in a food
competition, or as a predator, I am against it. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Sea lions had access to fish way before humans came on the scene. Perhaps the debate should be that
humans should keep way from sea lion food supplies and find alternatives.
The one animal that totally diminishes food supplies and resources is man and we do it consciously,
animals don't - they do it to survive and have no idea that people are in competition with them for
the same food supply.
Why do humans always want to reduce their own species and others when they feel threatened? Basic
human survival or greed ?
We have more than we need in the US and the West and perhaps we should re-think our own habits
before trying to justify wiping out yet another species for our own needs.
Sea lions are beautiful creatures who hurt no-one so why try to justify reducing their numbers when
they are no real threat to us? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I am against it.
The sea lions are on earth for a purpose.
They have as much right to that fish supply as do we.
Humans have caused the problems on earth by over use of most resources. Left to their own devices
the animal world self - regulates and only takes what it needs.
If we didn't want so much that we didn't need there would be plenty for everyone. Humans are greedy.
They are a greater threat to resources than sea lions.
Life is , I suppose, about the battle between the species. The most vicious hunter and predator to
many species is man. This is why so many species are now under the threat of extinction.
This attitude shows a complete lack of understanding of our obligations to the natural world and how
we should respect and preserve it.
Why do you think you have more rights to the fish than the creatures in the sea who depend on it?
We have alternatives, they don't. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
22 Jan 2008 09:35
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
