|
We should all be vegetarians and eat tofu and lentils. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I would love to hunt, if that didn't mean i had to kill. I have no problem with people hunting for
food... But look-it-that. I can't go four-frickin-miles without seeing a wal-mart, McDonald's, or
both. Ever see Bambi? (ha ha) Seriously, guys- hunting for pleasure is almost like condoned sadism. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Yes hunting is wrong most of us already eat the meat but now you have to be the one to go kill it i
understand for example that the British enjoy hunting a lot i for one think it is wrong but it is up
to the people to decide what they do whether it is wrong or not |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It is so WRONG!!!! Lyk I'm OK with hunting if its for survival... But not if its just for fun or 2
make lyk, fur coats or something... It's just mean...
*i don't have a fur coat because that's basically encouraging people to hunt and skin little animals
* |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I don't see why anyone would do this, i just don't understand why someone would want to kill a
animal that has done nothing to them or anyone else... Just to sit and poke at its body.
It is horrible! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It is pretty bad if you have no reason for doing it, just shooting things. Yeah...that's moral.
Just like when Dick Cheney was hunting and shot a man, it can also be considered dangerous for
humans as well as other animals. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I agree. Hunting IS a bad thing. BUT, if it's for food, in limited amount only. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Holy#@!#! What the heck!? Don't kill for pleasure if you do hunt at least eat what you catch its
disgraceful to the animals if you don't eat what you catch ! Jerks! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I agree, it should not be allowed.
There should be no debating the question of whether animals feel pain and, unless you are a very
good shot, hunting them is very likely to cause them harm.
Rearing them and killing them HUMANELY for food on the other hand, should be allowed. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
No its not. Its a necessarry role in controlling a lot of animal populations....like hogs and deer.
Without hunting, they would overpopulate, over-exhaust their food supply, and starve to death.
Hunting actually does them a favor. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Right now, where I live we are being over run by deer because people simply don't hunt as much as
they used to. They are causing more and more car accidents and crop damage and eventually they will
suffer a large die off from famine or disease, all because there aren't enough hunters. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Why is it OK that domestic animals are brutally slaughtered but it's not OK to hunt an animal and
make a quick clean kill. The meat you buy at your supermarket is an animal that went through a
slaughter house. You just don't know the suffering it went through, whereas in hunting the animal
dies literally in no more than 12 seconds. In the slaughter house sometimes the cows for example are
still alive when they are hung on the meat hooks. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Then wear plastic shoes and don't eat meat, chicken, fish, milk or eggs. Hunting is the least cruel
way of obtaining animal flesh or products. And it is on a far smaller scale. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Hunting is for the talented and practical person.
Not for the tree-huggers and fearful females. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Hunting is fine, especially if you use that animal for meat and other things. I'm not so sure if I
would do it for sport...I'm undecided in that aspect. But hunting in general is an animal instinct,
so I'm generally fine with it. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Hunting itself is not wrong, it is so that people can get meat for food. All animals do it. I think
hunting AS A SPORT is wrong. Killing living beings should not be a sport. It has a lot of moral
issues. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I think it is ok, because it helps animals not get over populated to where they starve to death, but
i do feel that if you are not going to eat the meat donate it to homeless shelters, soup kitchens,
or orphanages. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Hunting is not wrong and is actually a lot of fun. It is a chance to spend time with family and to
really bond with people. Plus it is not nearly as inhumane as people think. Think of deer hunting,
if there were no deer hunters those deer would painfully die by vehicles or die of starvation
because of over population. Those deaths are much worse for the animal than a gun shot is. I do
however have a problem with over hunting and poaching but this is controlled by the DNR. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Some people hunt for their survival, they need to live by hunting, and if you're ancestors never
hunted, you wouldn't be alive! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Hunting keeps the animal population in check. The population wont get too low because of limits on
how many you can kill and hunting season for different animals. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It kept your ancestors alive. That is why you are here. Nearly every act of eating requires death
to a plant or an animal. Would you rather eat a free range chicken you hunted or one that has been
kept chained in a tiny box in a kind of inhuman misery you can never know? Fruits and vegetables
also die when they are picked for consumption.
There are a very few exceptions-honey milk butter-but an exception is not the rule. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I see nothing wrong with hunting. At least the animal gets somewhat of a sporting chance as opposed
to say cows who are impregnated constantly so they can continuously produce milk, have their calves
taken away from them so they can become packaged meat, only to be grinded up into ground beef in the
end. Now that's a sucky life. Hunting though? I don't like to do it myself but I see nothing wrong
with doing it so long as the animals aren't endangered. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Hunting is not a bad thing. When I harvest the animal, it is for food...nothing else. If I were to
harvest a 3 year old white tail deer (buck) with a massive rack, that would just be a bonus;
however, my purpose in hunting is not the rack, but rather the meat. That is the way it is. This
is the tradition I am passing on. Hunting links us to our ancestral traditions. It places within a
person who understands the importance of it a love and respect for the animal and the environment. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Seriously if we didn't hunt we would over populate. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Hunting is not at all a bad thing in anyway. Ever since our history we have seen that kings from
many counties used to take hunting as a sport and they used to do it as a pleasure activity. Since
then hunting has become an integral part in many societies. Nowadays even people like hunting and
they go for hunting. Even in many countries there still remains the custom that in certain occasions
they go for hunting. Apart from these issues we can also see that hunting also helps in controlling
the animal population. Certain animals have a large population but with the help of hunting they are
coming into control. Even the government in certain countries also encourages hunting. Still in some
of the remote villages we can find that people are still alive by having the animals that they hunt.
Thus hunting is not a bad thing. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
If no one hunted, the earth would be overpopulated with animals. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I agree with huntcowboy because we are helping the environment by keeping the population of animals
down and then they won't run out of room to live in, in the forests and come into the town! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
How would we survive if we got started miles from civilization. Other Animals hunt. The Only way we
would have survived in the cavemen days. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
If we do not hunt the animals will overpopulate and we will have to deal with them coming into the
towns because all the animals ate their food |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Hunting for sport or fur is. I hunt rabbit and pheasant sometimes deer but if i kill it i will eat
it . |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
26 Feb 2008 17:04
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
