|
Hunting and Fishing would never be outlawed at least in the United States. However, it should and
is regulated for the protection of people and animals alike. Hunting and fishing are great forms of
recreation for families. They also provide food for people and prevent overpopulation in animals
such as deer. Also- even if hunting and fishing are just used as recreation, those animals can be
put to good use such as programs like Hunters for the Hungry, feeding needy people. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I do not hunt, but I am not against it, as long as the animal is used for food. I do not like
killing animals just for the sakeof killing. As for fishing, have you not heard of catch and
release. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It is necessary to hunt.
If we didn't hunt things like deer, then we would have a whole lot of wrecks because of them in the
roads.
Plus, we need to fish, because lots of people like fish.
Yummy,yummy!!! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
They cant or the animals will be over populated and they wood take over the world jk |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Hunting is a designated activity and no matter what we have to hunt |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It cant why would it be banned without hunting animals would overpopulate |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Well not sea creatures look how japan killed thousands of dolphins it makes me sooo mad and sad that
they could one day be extinct |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
At this time, it's reasonable to hunt certain animals, and can be a good way to keep food on the
table. But in the future, the hunting of even these animals may need to be banned if their numbers
get too small. Since we're no longer in the cavemen days, we can farm to put food on the table. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
06 Mar 2008 20:18
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
