|
All people that think people should be culled should be culled |
| |
 v00v  01 Aug 2009 02:52
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I agree with the culling and here is my list (the top group goes first and we work our way down)
- death row people
- murderers
- rapers
- robbers that make big robberys (like madoff)
- people that are in jail b/c of violent crimes
- corrupt politicians
- corrupt cops |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Yep heres my list.
Child abusers
serial killers
relgious fanatics
the welsh
fat people
people that drive too slow
gordon brown
george bush
tom cruise
david beckham
women that dont stop moaning
men that comb there hair to hide a bald spot
all teenagers
all old people
that should keep the numbers down... |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
You would need to start with the young of baby bearing age or the whole idea of stemming
overpopulation would be pointless. To cull the old, since they no longer reproduce and are on their
way out anyway, would only be for sake of gratuitous killing. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Isn't that what the death penalty should be used for and vigilante parents towards sex offenders |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It depends, if it's ramdonised then no. It needs coordination. We should start with the right wing
who keep telling us how we should be living. The overly religious and the long term unemployed. Get
rid of these people and you get better world. Still can't leave comments, my shout box works. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Aye! Hitler had the right idea, let's start with all the 'Gays', they are trying to take over the
world anyway, then all the politicians who try and tell us how we should be living our life, during
our brief time on this planet. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
The human population is growing at such a rate that we can not sustain the well being of everybody.
Therefore, I think large parts of the population should be culled, like humans cull seals and other
innocent animals. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Because we are NOT animals. We are intelligent, we can think in the abstract, we create, we invent,
we learn, and we endure. We are not animals and to mistake us as such is a grave mistake. This
debate represents the sickening decline in the value of human life. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Sure, why not? Just glad I'm not a human.
OK, no seriously, nature will take care of it - eventually. Either disease or famine or natural
disaster or even our own animalistic warring nature will take a big bite out of our population in
time. We don't need an active culling program to get it done. Just be glad nature hasn't gotten
around to kicking your own butt yet. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
We're already consuming more food than we are producing, so unless something is sorted out soon,
good 'ol mother nature will take care of it for us. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
The earth is not overpopulated thus no culling is required. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Let's see, Hitler tried to exterminate all European Jews and how well did that go? Who will be the
one with the power to decide who should be culled? Perhaps, we need to kill all babies born until
such a time where the population declines. That is too horrid to consider and so is killing any
group of people. I think this debate is just plain disgusting. While culling is done with
overpopulated animal populations in some areas, it is not right to take human life and there is
really no fair way to "decide" who should live and who should die. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
How about everybody that watches American Idol? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I don't thinks so. Sculling, while enjoyable to some doesn't seem to be a need. You can get the same
effect by strutting around like a chicken. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
