|
Yeah im for harry potter. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Ugh. I have to admit, I am way more fascinated by a vampire story than a wizard story. But Harry
Potter was better written. I was consumed into it when I was a kid, and I hated reading...
I had to put more of an effort in reading twilight... |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I agree harry potter is much better than twilight in my opinion i tried to read the first twilight
book but i could just not get into reading it and the sad part of that is i will read almost
anything but i could not read twilight the movie was not bad but i still did not really like it all
that much the harry potter movies are good and the books are twice as good as the movies so ya harry
potter rules |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
You can't even compare the two. Twilight was o.k., Harry Potter is just good, well done shows. You
have to also think of the fact that harry potter is in our decade, one of the series that strikes
out. Not twilight. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Completely agree.
When they had to make a completely different list for the New York Times because it was always at
the top... Well, doesn't that kinda speak for itself?
Harry Potter has a good mix of everything: Adventure, mystery, romance, humor, drama...
Twilight has some hot guys, and a LAME ending with no action.
Tough choice, tough choice... -dripping with sarcasm- |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I totally agree.
The Harry Potter series has gained its reputation as the most popular book series among all age
groups. The seven novels spent 10 years on the New York Times Best Selling list.
J.K. Rowling's incredible writing has made her a billionaire and has earned her several awards. Not
to mention the fact that the series has sold over 400 million copies.
Although it is not rational to say that Twilight is not good, Harry Potter has is a worldwide craze
and has earned the right to be called the best juvenile series in the world. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
17 Aug 2008 08:25
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
