» Home » Politics
Government Should Not Licence ANYONE To Get Married - It Is A Private And/or Religious Affair
The USA Government only began "officially sanctioning" started requiring marriage licenses in the 20th century, justifying it with "health concerns." People got married long before this, in their church, mosque, synagogue, etc. If people wish to get married, that is a personal decision and the form their marriage takes is a private affair. Other than exerting more control on its citizens, "for their own good," there is no necessary reason for the government to be involved at all.
 frankadams  15 May 2008 17:07
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
I agree. The Government has to butt into everything and find a way to collect money for anything that people need or want. Take your vehicle for example: The sticker and the plates, why do they have to charge for that? Then to make people pay for a license to unite in marriage when it is a completely religious event is ludicris. I cannot believe what the government collects money on and it needs to change.
 
 curious  16 May 2008 12:32
 Add a Comment
 
 
I didn't know that about it being a 20th century institution at the government level.

Things would need to change. I would be okay with this, but as it stands now, there are benefits that are accorded to married people via taxes and citizenship, insurance etc. This is not fair for those who are single. All things being equal, i am okay with it being a religious union recognized by their respective communities. I don't think that the government needs to be in the business of marriage. It would greatly widen the scope of marriage by the many types of faith that exist and will emerge.
 
 innomen  15 May 2008 23:05
 Add a Comment
 
 
It all goes downhill from here....
Once people have the "right" to marry the same sex, everything will change. You will see, unless you are too naive.
 
 taffy4jc  15 May 2008 19:44
 5 Comments
 
 taffy4jc, that's a bunch of cra*. I live in Mass. and nothing like that has happened. In fact it's been a major snooze. Nothing at all has changed, and not that many gay people even got married. No one really cares on either side.

Not to mention the fact that your sentence is messed up. Show me a Christian that has been persecuted by protesting gay marriage. I live here, and i have heard of no instances of any persecution. We live in peace at both ends, those of faith and those who are gay.
by  innomen
 15 May 2008 23:09
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Religion is the body that must cease sanctioning marriage, as religions of the west have so politicized marriage that they have made marriage is now a social issue that must be handled by secular leaders.
 
 Nando  21 May 2008 20:15
 Add a Comment
 
 
Married couples have many rights, though. For example, the right not to have to testify against each other in court. There're hundreds of others.

What if atheists want to get married? Should they have to go to a Christian church? No, they shouldn't.

If there's no government regulation, how will you prove that someone's having an affair? You don't have any license to prove you and the defendant were even in a relationship in the first place! Yes, you can pull witnesses. So can they.

If governments didn't regulate marriage, then people could go around marrying off twelve year old and five year old, or marrying their pets.

Marriage hasn't been a purely religious affair ever. Yes, is some areas it has been. But not all. It isn't, or shouldn't be, today, anywhere. Ya, religion should play a part, but shouldn't control or dominate it.
 
 FoxFire  15 May 2008 20:36
 Add a Comment
 
 
There are certain aspects of a partnership between two people which the government needs to get involved with. First, it needs to be sure that the marriage is not morally abhorrent. Examples of morally abhorrent marriages include incestuous partnerships and partnerships between adults and children.

Second, because partners have certain legal rights in relation to one another which differ from those of random citizens, partnerships need to be certified in some way. For example, in the matter of property inheritance or visiting rights in prison or hospital.

These issues make it necessary for the government to be involved at some level in recording the existence of intimate partnerships between two people. Whether that relationship is called marriage or not is not supremely important.

I have some sympathy with the view that religion belongs to the private sphere and governments should not be involved in it. However, the basic framework of legal rights and responsibilities pertaining to partnership requires government involvement of some sort.
 
 Hidell  15 May 2008 19:44
 Add a Comment
 
 
No, actually marriage is a governmental affair, it stopped being about religion long, long ago. You can walk down all the aisles in all the churches you want, you're not married until you get that piece of paper from the state. A religious ceremony is something you can do to CELEBRATE a marriage, it certainly isn't something you do that gets you married in the first place.
 
 Cephus  15 May 2008 19:32
 Add a Comment
 
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
McCain Is No War Hero.
The American Media Has A Right-wing Bias
Israel Should Be Under The Nuclear Umbrella.
Please Tell Me How Obama Is Like Ken Satr
Another Terrorist Attack Would Help McCain Win
Politicians Do Good (generally)
People Are Entitled To Equal Rights Not Equal Things
The Ukrainian President Yushchenko Is Not An Impostor
Illegal Immigrants Should Be Able To Get Driver's Licenses
The Two Party System (Democrats And Republicans) Is The Cause Of Many Of Americas Current Political Problem...
New Debates
Pure Joy Can Be Found By Helping Others
Katy Perry Is NOT A Lesbian!!
Mary Magdalene Wasn't A Prostitute.
There Is An Objective Moral Truth.
Airplane Travel Should Be Less Expensive
Anchorman Is One Of The Best Movies Ever
We Should Be Able To Have A President Who Agrees With Different Views From Each Side Of The Democratic...
A Dictatorship Is The Only Way To Go.
The Government Should Tell Us They Are Communicating With Aliens
The West Is Unfairly Demonizing China