|
Why a man need to marry a woman? No one can answers this!! The order of nature is always used to
against this, but the order of nature made the man need marry a woman, what cause the gay? It maybe
the same the order of nature!!! That just a lifestyle of oneself, no any harm to the society,why
against? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
The only valid argument against gay marriage would be there is a limit on the number of marriage
licenses that can be issued by a city, state/province or national government in a year. Since there
is no such limit, it's not a valid argument, and since there are no other valid arguments, there's
no reason to prevent gays from living and loving. It's outdated ignorance and bigotry, that's
all.
According to the Barna Group, a reichwing-run company that does surveys, 26% of fundamentalist
christians in the US get divorced, the highest percentage of any group, while atheists at 21% were
the lowest. How unsurprising that the godbots who talk about "family values" and
"protecting the sanctity of marriage" are the least likely to live up to it.
Http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_dira.htm
And, like most hypochristians, the Barna Group later buried their own research and refuse to provide
it anymore. |
| |
 K9  13 Nov 2009 08:11
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
The whole "it is abomination" thing was mistranslated, I heard. Though I've forgotten the original
word, it essentially meant "abnormal". In context, it had something to do with a decreasing
population of some town, society, etc.
Bible references aside, I'll answer with the classic question: Why not?
If you said "sure!" -- Well done, you're either open minded, or just don't care!
If you said "never!" -- You're a Nazi! Let's face it; you probably hate Black people and Jews as
well. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Ofcourse it should be allowed, what are the against side???feckin priests or muslims?? Gtf over it! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Of course they should be allowed to get married. Honestly, this debate is NEVER going to be resolved
with all the ignorant people in the world. If two people love each other, why should others be
granted the right to judge them or prohibit them from unification? I know there are plenty of
Bible-Thumpers out there who would say that its "evil" and that all gay people are going to be
"damned to Hell" and frankly, I could care less about those people. After all, isn't it wrong to
marry your family members or have more than one wife? The answer is yes, but there are still some
churches that condone that. In my opinion, marrying your cousin is a lot more disgusting than being
gay. Honestly, people are just afraid of what they can't understand and this is why the issue of gay
marriage is under such scrutiny. Get over it people; this is what change is. Get off your high
horses please. If you don't like what's happening, you can either (1)Ignore it. Or (2)Leave. Its
honestly that simple. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Yes they should be allowed to marry, people of the opposite sex! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
If we think Gays are the same as everyone else, then why not? I do think this hence Gay Marriage. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It is only fair and who wants to ask their partner if they will civil union with them? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It's all part of the plan. As soon as you accept gay marriage we have teams of gay ninjas waiting to
swoop into your houses. They will turn all your children gay and probably redecorate a little bit. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
What dangerous medical condition or other harmful anomaly can occur in a homosexual relationship
that has been utterly demonstrated not to be capable of occurring in a heterosexual one? If you
can’t find an answer to that question that's supported by scientific discovery you best not even
think about trying to sway me from agreeing with the debate. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
We should all be allowed to choose who we spend our lives with and the level of commitment we decide
to share with that person. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I think there are many good reasons to maintain marriage between man and woman. Not going to go
into them here, but I have "evolved" my thinking to--hey, marriage is a good thing, commitment to
another is a good thing, it would be better in many ways for the society to have folks more
monogamous (for health reasons) and so I vote yes. However, the equal rights argument holds no
water in my view. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
They should be alowed there rights as much as hetrosexual people are. I mean yeah its not what
everyone would call right as it is not what the bible says. But i think people need to move past
religion as everything in the bible has or can be disproved by science and fact.
So yeah, gay rights. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I'm completely in favor of gay marriage. 1) It truly does no harm to society. States have had gay
marriage for more than a few years now and society didn't fall apart. 2) It's necessary for
equality, especially for equal legal rights. 3) It brings families and love together. It's
beautiful. Hey heterosexual marriages may be falling apart at an alarming rate, so who are the
straights to try to tell the gays they don't qualify for marriage? The gays will probably treat the
institution with even more respect than the straights. 4) Don't even start on the "what about the
kids" argument because many gay families have adopted and are raising happy well adjusted kids.
Once again it's actually straight couples behind the track record of broken families and child abuse
and neglect. 5) And yes I'd be willing to except "union" or some other name instead of marriage
PROVIDED all the legal rights and obligations tied to marriage are also tied to the different term. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Gays shouldnt even be allowed in the united states because it will decrease the population because a
male and a male cant make a baby and a female and a female cant make a baby!!! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Look, what's next after this? Centuries ago, many people said it was wrong, and yet since it gave a
sense of pleasure, people began to 'experiment' their sexual needs in different kinds of ways. For
instance - incest, bestiality, etc., even though they knew that it was wrong in their heart. And few
years ago, people would've scoffed at the idea of gay marriage. But are you people all blind? The
reason why government is allowing gay marriage is possibly due to the persecution of the gays and
disorder. To keep that order, the law had done this, and media encouraged the idea of homosexuality.
However, being gay means that you were influenced by your surroundings. My friend who was from
another country said that her former country had tons of gay people living there because of their
culture. It's not about your genes. Oh, just because you're obese, you blame it on your genes and
don't do anything about it... That's not right. If you're obese and if your health is faltering,
then do something about it! Control, where's your sense of control? Are we not human, and don't we
have a sense of will-power and control? People, you may be saying that it's right to marry the one
you love, and say that bestality or necrophilia or pedophilia is wrong, but years later, these
things will be allowed if gay marriage opens its door. And it's already started.... |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No they shouldn't. That very notion is corrupt. Marriage is between a man and a woman. Not between
two dudes or 2 women. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No, they shouldn't. Marriage was specifically designed for a man and a woman, homosexuality is
unnatural, and it's an abomination.
What's next, incest marriage? |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
