» Home » The Unknown
"ForandAgainst" Should Not Edit Comments/posts
As long as there is no profanity or threats, there should be no reason to edit/delete a comment or post. We the right to exercise our freedom of speech.
 baconbust  14 Feb 2008 14:09
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
I agree. Some responses are removed for trivial reasons. At least give a reason that is more than two words...
 
 SlyOne  01 Nov 2008 05:57
 Add a Comment
 
 
As long as it isn't abusive, ie racist or prejudice then everyone should have the right to state their views and what they believe in.
 
 kddan  13 Oct 2008 16:34
 Add a Comment
 
 
I know ehh..
I never knew that they edit some posts or comments.
As long as its not "abusive",
you have the right to state your case:D
 
 sah01  29 Sep 2008 05:19
 Add a Comment
 
 
I agree with you baconbust. I just so happen to bump into this website and wrote about a topic concerning unwed mothers vs women who choose artificial insemination where the child either way wants to know who their father is and it was not accepted why? I saw a article on TV and some of the children from artificial insemination was on Oprah show telling their sad story about wanting to find their fathers. So, I was just trying to express this but it was deleted as this will probably be.
 
 pac3001  10 Jul 2008 17:20
 Add a Comment
 
 
I agree because obviously if this is a site where we can state our views on a subject without profanity or vulgarity, we should be able to express our opinions without being afraid of them getting deleted.
 
 JessicaR  04 Jul 2008 02:26
 Add a Comment
 
 
What do you mean "As long as there is no profanity or threats"? I don't think they should edit comments no matter what's in them.
 
 ur_wrong  09 Jun 2008 07:05
 Add a Comment
 
 
Forandagainst has every right to delete my posts for whatever reason they want because this web domain is their property. I think they should not delete things. I think the site would be more popular if they didn't delete profane comments. This would lead to more profit from advertisements.
 
 JohnShier  23 May 2008 05:00
 Add a Comment
 
 
Well, I kind of agree. We should have the right to give out our opinions, even if others don't like them. But we don't have the right to make profane threats to others, that is wrong.
 
 Mark  30 Apr 2008 02:08
 Add a Comment
 
 
Unless the comment is completely pointless, or extremely offensive I think they should probably be left alone. I say this because really what is the point of the site if people are not allowed to express themselves? If the post is going to be edited there should be a reason given for it so people know in the future and it should not be edited to the point where the original posters opinion is be misrepresented.
 
 Untoldrose  27 Apr 2008 11:28
 Add a Comment
 
 
It's starting to seriously get annoying. We have the right to give evidence to support our side. The admins and moderators shouldn't remove them at all.
 
 Amatsu  21 Mar 2008 23:42
 Add a Comment
 
 
I agree with this topic, to a certain extent. If someone’s post or comment violates a particular regulation, I believe it should be edited. However, I believe that the person who’s comment or post is being edited should get notice of this occurrence, to prevent future events of similar aspects. My posts within the topics of “Evolution has no proof whatsoever” and “The Big Bang Theory contradicts science” continue to get edited, by means of deleting information essential to the post’s overall point. I’ve received no notification of these changes, nor any reason as to why someone believed it was a good idea to delete information in my discussions. At first I believed it was due to the length of the posts themselves. However, after noticing that many other posts in other debating topics were just as long, if not longer, than my own, I dismissed that conclusion as a reasonable excuse. If there is a problem with any of my posts or comments, I ask that it be discussed with myself before any staff member takes it upon themselves to edit my posts to their liking.
 
 Hizashi  20 Mar 2008 00:29
 Add a Comment
 
 
I agree, no opinion should be discriminated against - wouldn't make a good debate if they were. Although swearing should be edited out for the most part.
 
 sensai80  19 Mar 2008 17:59
 Add a Comment
 
 
Yes, I agree because some of the stuff I have said has disappeared or not appeared at all.
 
 Jahwobble  07 Mar 2008 20:59
 2 Comments
 
 Funny, I've had this happen too, as well as words disappearing from posts, or splitting into two words with a different meaning. Frustrating. Yet, a site owner should be able to delete spam and profanity.
by  Chell
 07 Mar 2008 21:42
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
That would be denying our right to speak our mind. As long as there is no racial, threatening or abusive comments/posts, why should they need to moderated when we have the right to speak freely and get our opinions across?
 
 L-S-E  19 Feb 2008 15:03
 Add a Comment
 
 
I completely agree. I have seen some of this going on, this is a debate site. If you don't like what someone has to say, too bad get over it!
 
 Fromwithin  14 Feb 2008 21:05
 Add a Comment
 
 
Of course I'm going to agree with myself! I'm tired of leaving comments or posts, that get deleted! This is a debate site, it's not going to be "sugar, spice, and everything nice," people will argue. That is just the reality of it, comments, and posts should not be edited/deleted!
 
 baconbust  14 Feb 2008 14:10
 3 Comments
 
 Can you give examples of the kinds of thing that have been edited? I haven't noticed this before.
by  Hidell
 14 Feb 2008 14:17
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Profanity and threats is just blowing off steam for some people.
 
 RagTatter  13 Oct 2008 16:41
 Add a Comment
 
 
Why not i love doing that
 
 Amber2015  03 Aug 2008 21:11
 Add a Comment
 
 
If you are an American, or live in a country where freedom of speech is a constitutionally-mandated right, then you should have the right to say whatever you please.

But the Internet is not America. It's worldwide, and largely ungoverned. Further, just because you -can- say whatever you want doesn't mean you -should-. ForandAgainst has every right to edit whatever they see fit on their site. If you don't like it, then don't comment here.

See how that turns around on you just as easily? The whole 'if you don't like it..' train of thought is not only arrogant, it's immature and abrasive. Perhaps you might want to consider -why- what you said got canned, and act to correct it.
 
 Runewise  14 May 2008 17:40
 Add a Comment
 
 
There is always one crucial thing I've found that people who partake in a forum don't seem to quite get or understand..

This is not a democracy .. The site owners can do what the hell they like, when they like and no one else has any say.. So forget it..

You have no rights here, there is no freedom of speech here, you are simply allowed to say stuff at the site owners discretion, end off ...
 
 Lawcom  19 Mar 2008 18:05
 9 Comments
 
 But should they, I don't think they should. Or if they do at least have the courtesy to say why it has been done.
by  StBalders
 19 Mar 2008 18:08
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
To make the site a good debate site, I think sometimes it is necessary to edit some bad spelling or delete non-sense debates. Moderating the site is a different thing with free speech.
 
 uberlovely  26 Feb 2008 12:03
 2 Comments
 
 If they deleted comments w/ spelling errors half of your comments would be gone.
by  baconbust
 26 Feb 2008 23:12
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Aside from nasty language and the inciting of hate and violence that a website owner should have the right to ban, there are always spammers to keep at bay. So there are times when it's perfectly reasonable to snip words or press delete.
 
 Chell  25 Feb 2008 16:26
 Add a Comment
 
 
There are several instances when I think that moderators of debate websites like "For and Against" are well advised to modify or even delete comments. Despite what some people may claim, deleting comments that do not add any substance to a debate or modifying those that are unclear or incoherent are not actions that constitute censorship. If debate responses were deleted for ideological or political reasons, then that would certainly constitute censorship, but moderators of any site would still be well within their rights, since they are permitted to control what content appears on their pages.

It is obviously important that people who visit this site are able to benefit from the posts that appear on these pages. Sometimes, a little editing may be in order and through this review process, moderators can clarify ambiguous comments.
 
 mackenzie  17 Feb 2008 00:04
 Add a Comment
 
 
Well, it's their website so technically they can do what ever they want.
 
 spongebob  16 Feb 2008 07:35
 2 Comments
 
 The question is whether you agree with it or not, not whether they do or don't do it.
by  baconbust
 17 Feb 2008 01:33
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Well crap. I'm against censorship, but Hidell makes a convincing argument. Did you mean to argue for censorhsip Hidell? I have had some comments reworded, but never deleted. I didn't even like the rewording, but I can see where it could be a steep downhill slide if people could say whatever they wanted. Maybe a separate site? Most people on this site don't seem mature enough to say whatever comes to their minds and still make a good argument (probably me included). I sure do miss cursing though. :)
 
 fngrbng420  15 Feb 2008 18:54
 3 Comments
 
 Well crap it's real interesting you say any of this, when I have read some of your comments, and posts. Take about arguing, maybe you should re-evaluate some of your comments. I also find it interesting that regardless of what I deabte about you always disagree.... so basically it's because you don't like me as a person (which is ridiculous because this is the internet) and it has nothing to do with what this debate is about. Have fun with that... hmmmmmm

Yes here is one about a similar issue let's read it together!

Once you start deciding what is OK to say and what is wrong to say, free speech is gone. Well said Cephus.
fngrbng420 14 Feb 2008 06:53

by  baconbust
 15 Feb 2008 19:13
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I'm not sure about this one. On the one hand, I believe in freedom of speech. On the other, the anonymity of the Internet encourages the worst in some people. I certainly think that no ideas should be censored. But debates sometimes descend into exchanges of insults. The site owners might take the view that they want to encourage a more elevated level of discourse.

There are also instances where people start debates which aren't really debates, just foolish observations, or which raise a topic for discussion without advocating a particular point of view. It seems reasonable that moderators should intervene in these cases to preserve the integrity of the format.
 
 Hidell  15 Feb 2008 12:03
 1 Comment
 
 So basically you say your for freedom of speech, but truly your against it. Ok I get it know.
by  baconbust
 15 Feb 2008 19:23
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
People has the right of free speech, but forandagainst.com is a regular debate website, and the moderator also has the right to edit or delete so called debates that actually are more like questions. The debates site should be like a site of debates not questions, and there will also be some improper or bad comments, such as" you are an idiot" when people disagree with others opinions. The site has its own rules, Users need to understand that good etiquette will make the site a pleasant and safe place to spend your time online. And The site should be responsible for its feature and the users. That's what the moderators try their best to do.
 
 junta  15 Feb 2008 07:36
 13 Comments
 
 Again your not for freedom of speech either, otherwise you wouldn't want to have comments moderated.
by  baconbust
 15 Feb 2008 19:24
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Religious Beliefs Are The All Time Leading Cause Of Death
Some People Who Do Not Believe In God Still Believe In The Devil
Some UFOs Are Alien Spacecraft
Ryan Mcgee Is Fat
God Has Been Lost Because Of Our Attempts As Theists To Protect Something Which Can't Be Defended Or...
It Is Idiotic To Compare God To Santa
Saying The Bible Is Open To Interpretation Invalidates It As Being A Document Of Truth.
It Is Not Possible For God To Be All-Knowing, All-Powerful, And All-Good.
God Is Not A Magic Santa Claus In The Sky.
Spiders Are Sort Of Creepy But Helpful.
New Debates
The "Gay Marriage" Debate Is The Result Of A Much Larger Issue.
There Is A Shadow Government Running The World. Currently They Are Working On The U.S.-- Intimidating...
Rap Music Sucks.
The Sims Are Fun Games And Can Actually Help With Social Problems.
Money Is Not The Pursuit Of Happiness.
The Beatles Were Great Musicians That Influenced All Great Bands Today.
It's Not My Responsibility To Educate Your Child
Humans Need To Stop Criminalizing Animals
God Really Doesn't Care What You Eat, How You Dress, Your Choice Of Music, Or Probably Many Other Cultural...
The Government Is Doing To Much On Immigration.