» Home » Science
Evolution Is Wrong
Do you believe evolution? There is no scientist can give strong evidence to support evolution. I would like to hear your opinion.
 hitomi  04 Dec 2007 14:37
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
My opinion doesn't really matter, so whatever makes me feel the best I will go with. I don't want to believe that i used to be a monkey. A serious source of self-doubt for teenagers, I'd think... But adaptation, the less extreme version, can be worked with.
 
 Dadmad6  17 Feb 2013 17:40
 1 Comment
 
 well thats a big misunderstanding of evolution is thinking we came from monkey's or chimp.....we came from neither one, but we do share a common ancestor
by  godsgeew
 16 May 2013 21:52
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Evolution is for people who DON'T WON'T to believe in God Almighty
 
 BiblicanB  29 Sep 2012 18:38
 2 Comments
 
 You know why people who believe in evultion don't often belive in god? That's because they have seen logic.
by  Kryten4000
 30 Sep 2012 09:50
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Mega cock!!!!
 
 wilsja17  03 Sep 2012 02:19
 Add a Comment
 
 
I believe evolution is not real. Sure they found "lucy" and such but the just need to find the "missing link" how long have they been looking? Yea. They will never find it. I was born a christian and always will be. When i was put into public school and i learnt about this nonsense it just seemed proposterous and not true at all.
 
 taliae123  21 May 2012 00:07
 3 Comments
 
 School generally teach evolution very poorly, you sound like you are interested in learning, maybe look into it a little more.
by  nemomonopo
 21 May 2012 03:55
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Evolution is a theory, just like religion is a theory. Both are backed up with evidence and i think that there is really no purpose in life if you are a religion-hater because then you dont really have a philosophy ect.
 
 notebook  01 Sep 2011 07:08
 5 Comments
 
 Oh really? A lack of religion has no philosophy? Why must we follow a set philosophy when we know our own morals and we don't need anyone to tell us how to live? What if we don't want to stone people for adultery?
by  Antares
 17 Oct 2011 10:48
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
There are many reasons why evolution fails.

Giraffes - giraffes have a HUGE heart, naturally. It has to pump massive amounts of blood up to its brain. In its neck, arteries have check valves, for a lack of better terms. These valves help keep the blood flowing to the brain. At the back of the brain it has a sponge to absorb the blood and let it seep to the brain. With out these valves and sponge, when the giraffe bends down to drink, the force of its heart pumping the blood to the brain, his head would explode. That's how much pressure is coming out of its heart.

How do these valves and this sponge evolve? It couldn't have because there would be no parent species to pass on the "trial and error" results. All giraffes would be dead.

If someone wants, I have many more, even physical laws that would have to be broken.
 
 Mr_Obvious  19 Jul 2011 14:44
 41 Comments
 
 "Simmons and Altwegg suggest that giraffes' necks may have begun growing as a way of eating hard-to-reach food, but that they were then "hijacked" for mating purposes. Once the necks had reached a certain length, males could use them for necking and clubbing – and at that point sexual selection took over, driving the necks to their current extreme lengths."
Blame it on sex and that little thing called “millions of years”.
by  justsumguy
 19 Jul 2011 17:02
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Look at the woodpecker. It is optimized for the repeated impact against trees, from its beak to its head to its tail feathers.

These features, according to evolutionary theory, would have had to develop in stages over a long period. Obviously, this could not have occurred. The first stages of this development would have been superfluous beginnings of anatomical changes. Those would have been bred out in offspring. In addition, a bird without these developments would not be able to drill into trees in the manner that a woodpecker does.
 
 Alton1  30 Mar 2011 19:24
 1 Comment
 
 You are found wanting in faith. That makes you unscientific.
by  Stranger
 05 May 2011 16:57
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Your'e all going to hell
 
 mubulu  23 Mar 2011 12:10
 2 Comments
 
 That isn't an argument.
by  Antares
 27 Apr 2011 08:37
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Micro evolution? Yes indeed..that has been confirmed and witnessed

Macro evolution? Way to dodge accountability from the God who created you, and allows you to breath every breath of oxygen. There are to many holes in macro evolution to list here........

Http://www.truegospel.org/
 
 Mremerson  10 Feb 2011 14:28
 1 Comment
 
 What you call macro evolution, which is not a separate process than any other type of evolution, has not only been witnessed but recreated in the lab many many times. Here is just the very first site listed out of many describing some of the expirements.

http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-speciation.html
by  finsch
 10 Feb 2011 15:06
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
If in evolution you refer Darwin's human evolution then yes it is wrong. It is wrong simply because we are not any specie of monkey's ( looking at humanity nowadays it's kinda hard to believe) nevertheless it has been reproached by scientists a couple of months ago proving that there is no link between us and the good old Neanderthal.as for DNA with a chimp well we share a percentage of DNA with every creature on the planet at variety of levels that so far doesn't mean much.
 
 Medic  12 Dec 2010 16:56
 3 Comments
 
 I don't know what you have been reading but;

a) Recent findings have directly linked Neanderthal and Homo Sapiens to the point that we are now sure that their was sexual mingling between us.

b) Darwin did not directly deal with the subject of human evolution at all. The human monkey link was never made by him but by ignorant people who felt threatened by facts, so made things up.
by  finsch
 05 Feb 2011 11:12
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Of course
 
 jerry0002  28 Jul 2010 19:42
 Add a Comment
 
 
I think its so wrong and immoral too :)
 
 shogduke  06 Jun 2010 02:12
 1 Comment
 
 That's life... as the song goes
by  gemeni
 29 Jun 2010 21:59
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Its not so much is evolution wrong but is religion right

btw i laughed for ages at the site below. U guys should take a look
 
 KNIGHT  17 Apr 2010 05:46
 1 Comment
 
 LOL
by  Mr-Spicy
 10 Jun 2010 22:49
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Http://www.remnantofgod.org/creation.htm heres proof of god
 
 iluvgod  07 Apr 2010 01:08
 1 Comment
 
 http://www.riddledchain.org/contracreation.htm
Here is an article that nulls many of the points your linked article makes.
by  rewndude1
 04 May 2012 06:38
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
It is wrong
and for you people that want to believe that you came from a monkey you're on your own you freak
 
 yorly101  05 Mar 2010 01:40
 2 Comments
 
 how christlike :)
by  dagav
 05 May 2011 15:52
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
The theory of evolution contradicts the Bible and I am so for the Bible.
 
 Aquos  18 Dec 2009 01:03
 2 Comments
 
 You should know that the bible is written by humans as well.
by  Douglas
 26 Feb 2010 09:31
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
It is about 40,000,000,000 to one that it is right!
 
 Tomcat  28 Oct 2009 15:54
 2 Comments
 
 1 to 1 or one to one. See how much better it looks when you write them both out or just use the numbers on both? You should avoid switching in the middle of a sentence. Oh and your statistical analysis is a little light in facts and data and such. You seem to be more comfortable with fantasy. Why is that pussycat?
by  finsch
 29 Oct 2009 13:56
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I don't believe that monkies can evolve to humans, and that dinosaurs can evolve to birds. It's been many, many years since then, perhaps even millions years, and we humans still share the same physical attribute.

And yes, if you truly believe that we evolved from monkies, thanks for locking them up in cages at the zoo.
However, all things are necessary to know, is what I believe. It's worth knowing what evolution is about.
 
 joylove101  02 Oct 2009 02:47
 2 Comments
 
 We didn't have the same attributes! Early humans were stouter and more chimp like as proven by fossils which were found underground.
by  Antares
 27 Apr 2011 08:41
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
The theory of evolution is the persistent progressional change of all life forms in which small variances from one generation to the next unconsciously conspire to evolve itself to better suit the conditions presented to the species.
Thus, all species are in a transitional state that never rests into perpetuity. That being said it should be odd that ANY fossils of the same species would be alike in manner within the vast fossil record considering how infrequent a perspective fossil would find itself the beneficiary of the unlikely matter of events that takes a such snapshot in time. But the contrary is true in as much that all species within the fossil record appear suddenly without previous representation and just as suddenly disappear void of any transitional manifestations or advantageous improvements that evolution relies upon.
Scientists can only point to two representative fossils and draw an unscientific unproven conclusion that one evolved into the other. In fact there are innumerable examples of this. But, the one thing that doesn't exist in all of creation and the vast fossil record *IS THE FOSSIL IN BETWEEN THOSE TWO*!!!! Likenesses or similarities between species doesnt suggest evolution but instead suggests a common creator using likewise body structures and bio systems. Commonalities in design are the product of a common designer. Thus, when one finds two similar examples of an animal it is meaningless. The only thing that gives evolution credible legs to stand on is a succession of fossils that demonstrate an evolutionary timeline. NOTHING like this exists in the least in the fossil record. Of all of the millions of species not one single example can be shown of multiple succeding fossils.
Scientist stick to the world of unfamiliar and vague species to hang their hat on in the evolution lie. Why? Because its easier to make a sales pitch using scientific vernacular and long extinct reptiles and shellfish than it is to work in the realm of the understandable and familiar. In short, there are no "almost" elephants. No "almost giraffes". For evolution to be true one should find innumerable giraffes of varying stages of evolution. It should be rare that two are the same. Yet all are the same. There are no exceptions. Period. Again, the scientists ply their trade utilizing the vague and plausible and unfamiliar species to hoodwink everyone.
The only thing that can be gleaned from the fossil record are implied or coincidental similarities that fall radically short of a hundred million year progression of successively improved archetypes within the same species line. If evolution were valid the entire fossil record would consist of almost entirely different and varied subsequent species over the eons. Exactly the opposite is true, and that is the entire fossil record is static and unvaried. The fact is, you can go out and dig up some saber tooth tiger bones and they will be exactly like all those dug up before.
 
 maxtor  01 Oct 2009 20:31
 1 Comment
 
 Hi Max. Good post and interesting points raised. I am very confident someone with a far more detailed understanding of the subject will come back at you and I for one will enjoy reading it. You pose some far better questions than usually come from the anti-evolutionists.

One quick thought pops into my mind - isn't the saber toothed tiger an "almost tiger"? If not quite what do you mean by "almost elephant"? One with no trunk or 3 legs?

I take it you are a creationist (or similar). If so how do the dinosaurs fit into the whole process. Please explain the timeline? Did a creator have several spells of creating the animals of the planet over its 4 billion year history.

Are you religious, just out of interest.
by  StBalders
 01 Oct 2009 20:47
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I agree god created everything and everybody
 
 shipp  01 Apr 2009 19:12
 Add a Comment
 
 
You know what i don't think it makes sense either. I know the neanderthals were our ancestors, and somehow they evolved and so.......became smarter and less stronger than they were. It doesn't make sense. It's like a micro species came out of water, had butt sex with a bug, and that thing had butt sex with a monkey, and that had even more butt sex with a monkey and that became a neanderthal and that neanderthal somehow became a human being like us....i dunno
 
 willis94  19 Mar 2009 02:55
 Add a Comment
 
 
Science did it for the lulz
 
 Epicfailgy  01 Dec 2008 17:25
 Add a Comment
 
 
Amen breteren
 
 Feremeir1  25 Nov 2008 03:58
 Add a Comment
 
 
I believe that humans can mentally evolve, but not physically. Like for instance, half a dozen words used in common speech today were swear words back in the '60's. Also new ideas and new thoughts are springing up every day. That's why I think humans are getting smarter, not physically changing.
 
 heracross1  25 Nov 2008 03:52
 1 Comment
 
 so why are there different races of humans??
by  openurmind
 11 Jan 2009 22:02
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Yes.

Because, "In the beginning God created heaven and earth. The earth was without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep. And God said, 'Let there be light', and there was light."
(Genesis 1:1)
 
 sylverwyld  07 Nov 2008 03:49
 4 Comments
 
 What in the heck does that have to do with evolution. You people are literally out of your minds.

So how about that beginning? (this is a different subject - sorry evolutionsists) Without form and void. let's think for once in our lives shall we?

How long was this without form and void period. One split second at the beginning?999 trillion years?
next:
Darkness upon the face of the deep where the Spirit of God moved upon the face of the waters. This is before Light and was created and seperated from darkness which is before the creation of the lights in the sky which is before the creation of the two lights.
How long was this. What was happening through this period?
Then God created the light. He seperated it from the darkness which is described above. Again, this is before anything about the Sun and Moon and our planet. How long was this? What happened during this time?

Best of all..

What on God's green Earth does it have to do with evolution? Cosmology maybe.

Sorry for being so snippy about it. : )
by  justsumguy
 07 Nov 2008 04:38
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
God created the earth in six days according to Genesis.
 
 Good1212  02 Nov 2008 16:38
 8 Comments
 
 Wow, it's scary that someone actually believes this.
by  Andromeda
 05 Nov 2008 17:42
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
No, i don't believe in evolution. Evolution dis-credits the intelligent Creator in favor of blind chance.
 
 webman1200  11 Oct 2008 18:44
 6 Comments
 
 It favours scientific evidence instead of blind faith don't you mean?
by  ScottyRAWR
 12 Oct 2008 19:11
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
It is proven that it was just a random idea that Darwin had when he was in a boat at an island. He was just writing his thoughts in his journal. I just wonder how it became such a big thing as it is now? It all sounds stupid to me
 
 ckell663  23 Sep 2008 09:39
 6 Comments
 
 Evolution was not an idea, but a well thought out theory. The only reason it sounds stupid to you is because you don't understand it. Get some education.

http://www.worsleyschool.net/science/files/evolution/facts.html
by  Andromeda
 25 Sep 2008 17:06
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Look I will put this as simply as I can. God created this World period. Evolution is a fairy tale. Now if you want to believe in evolution that's fine with me, but remember the bible says" it is appointed onto man once to die and then the judgement" so if you want to believe in evolution you better be prepared to tell God he is wrong someday. I truly feel sorry for evolutionist.
 
 doran  15 Sep 2008 05:19
 9 Comments
 
 I don't think you can put it more simply then that, good job. The problem with saying god created this world is that you have no proof that any god created anything, or that a god even exists in the first place. Now this is the part that I had a good laugh at, "Evolution is a fairy tale." I've heard this several times and it makes me laugh every time. Evolution is a fairy tail and you believe a man wearing a robe and sandals created the world, you keep thinking that. The bible is a book of mythology that has some good fiction stories and that’s it. Some people use it as a self-help book to run their lives, but some of us know how to run our lives very well without it. This whole debate has nothing to do with the existence of god, but whether or not species are the way they are today as a result of evolution. Don't feel sorry for me, I feel sorry for you. Creationists are people who won't come out of the dark-ages. Creationists are walking around in circles in a room and they won't leave that room because all the doors say "EVOLUTION HAS HAPPENED" on them. Before you deny evolution out right, you should know what you're talking about, here's some websites so you can get educated.

http://www.worsleyschool.net/science/files/evolution/facts.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introduction_to_evolution
by  Andromeda
 18 Sep 2008 01:39
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I don't have enough faith to believe in evolution. Believing that we came from a rock just seems crazy to me.
 
 created  15 Sep 2008 02:20
 3 Comments
 
 lol...I liked that. There's nothing wrong with evolution. Judging by what is said on this site, there are humans who insist they have no link to a creator.

It's possible they evolved and those who have the link were created.

I know...I know...that's sick. But it's good scientific debate.
by  justsumguy
 15 Sep 2008 02:35
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
The chances that one cell evolved into another cell is HIGHLY unlikely. As one scientist puts it: "The probability that one cell evolves into another has the same probability of a tornado sweeping through a junk yard and forming a 747 from scrap metal."

Also, most scientists agree that the Earth was formed 4.7 billion years ago. The time it would take for a trilobite (one of the most simplests forms of life) to evolve into a Human Being would take trillions of years. Not 4.7 billion.
 
 bluestater  08 Sep 2008 00:02
 4 Comments
 
 Your not seriously suggesting that trilobites evolved into humans are you.
by  Andromeda
 10 Sep 2008 14:54
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Evolution, and creation, like archaeology, and crime scene investigation are deductive sciences. They posit a theory, and then search for the proofs. The problem arrives when they find answers that don't tell them what they want to hear. Both sides of this question are guilty of wrongly interpreting evidence, or of rejecting a priori, evidence that is applicable to the question, because it doesn't work within the limits of their theory.
In deductive sciences, the way to find which theory is the most plausible, or probable (because the only way to be 100% sure is to be able to return back in time to when it actually happened and to observe it.), is to compile the evidence for both sides, and see which side applies properly the most amount of evidence, from all of the domains of science and philosophy.
One problem that comes into the picture is that when we debate this problem, our presuppositions often take control, and we refuse to listen to the arguments of the other side.
I found it interesting to recently find out that in North America, there is a very small community of Astrophysicists (Carl Sagan was a part of this community), and the majority of the community believe that God created the universe (evidently Carl Sagan was not part of this majority). This fact is interesting because these scientists deal with the stars, and especially with what evidence our universe gives us of it's beginning. Astrophysicists are unanimous that the universe began with a "bang". Philosophers will tell us that every thing that has a beginning must have a creator. Aristotle speaks of the unmoved mover. (Someone might ask the rather unphilosophical question, "well if everything that exists needs a cause, who caused God?" I will answer right now, that neither I, nor the philosopher who first realised this ever said that "everything that exists needs a cause", but everything that has a beginning, in other words, everything that is finite. God, by definition is infinite, which means that he had no beginning. But, that's another debate.) Therefore, philosophically speaking, if the universe had a beginning, it therefore had a cause. If you want to know more, read aristotle on the different types of causes.
Time is short, so, I'll just finish with a simple observation. If evolution is true, then the universe is eternal. However, science has shown us that the universe cannot be eternal (2nd law of thermodynamics). Scientests have tried to get around this fact by positing a theory where the universe is in constant fluctuation. An interesting theory, but inconsistent with the 2nd law of thermodynamics. When all the usable energy is used up, we will not have energy for another "bounce." Whatever the case, I must go, these are some of the reasons why I think that evolution is wrong. However, I haven't read all the books yet, I'm currently working through Richard Dawkins, "the blind watchmaker," which is so far, quite interesting. Until next time.
 
 Romains1  07 Sep 2008 22:14
 5 Comments
 
 I agree with everything you said except for one point. The universe and the big bang theory have nothing to do with evolution; they are two completely different sciences. One is astronomy/cosmology the other is biology. Let me ask one question. Have you ever seen any convincing evidence to back up evolution? I haven't read any of Dawkins work yet but I plan too. Right now I'm working on "Evolution: The Triumph of an Idea," by Carl Zimmer, and I'm also reading, "Big Bang: The Origin of the Universe," by Simon Singh. Both are really good, and would recommend them to anyone who is interested.
by  Andromeda
 07 Sep 2008 23:12
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Evolution is a religion. Evolution is the faith of atheism because it replaces God with man. When you've conned yourself into believing that some kind of ancient slime morphed into progressively complex and directional life forms, you are in the realm of faith, not science.
The religion of evolution has its own doctrines, traditions, lifestyle, and culture. Social Darwinism is the logical extension of the theory of evolution, which manifests itself in many different philosophies and religions. Examples of these are:
* The "do your own thing" philosophy.
* The "survival of the fittest, and I am the fittest" mentality.
* The "rugged individual" type of capitalism (like Ayn Rand).
* New Age movement.
* Marxism.
* Socialism.
* Racism.
* Nazism.
Hitler worshiped and was worshiped
 
 v00v  05 Sep 2008 03:24
 10 Comments
 
 You don't know much about evolution, science or even what the definition of religion is do you. For something to be religious it has to do with belief in the existence of at least one of the following: a human soul or spirit, a deity or higher being, or self after the death of one’s body. As far as I know evolution has nothing to do with any of these things. "Ancient slime morphed into progressively complex and directional life forms," I'm not going to respond to that. If you want to ask an intelligent question about evolution you're more than welcome to. Before you deny something are make ludicrous comments about it you should always understand it first. I am glad you didn't say we came from apes.
by  Andromeda
 07 Sep 2008 21:39
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
To find out if evolution is true or not read the first verse of the bible. Gen 1:1
 
 Krahner  18 Aug 2008 04:50
 3 Comments
 
 FROM THE BIBLE'S POINT OF VIEW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
by  Lawyer
 18 Aug 2008 06:08
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Evolution is right because how did we get here fall from the sky no we had to come from somewhere whether it is bacteria or a fish adapted to an enviroment so much that we are here we didnt fall from the sky no matter what argument you put up there is a counter argument
 
 ronix10  23 Feb 2013 22:08
 Add a Comment
 
 
There is plenty of strong evidence that supports evolution. Wether it is undeniable is another story. There is no evidence what so ever for the alternative. So it isn't wrong.We just dont know its 100% right. Although logically, it is.
 
 df0512  26 Dec 2012 13:19
 Add a Comment
 
 
Evolution is just better
 
 Lewz  19 Nov 2012 05:33
 Add a Comment
 
 
The fact that you were even born, is evidence of evolution. Are you superior to you're parents in some stuff? Are you a bit taller, or something alike? Have you got any differ artibutes? If yes, congratulation, you have just proven evolution. If not, to bad, but you have still found reliable proof. Think about it... If there was no evolution, , you would be in no way different from your parents. Like a clone. You'd be as short and have the same lack of intelligence as the ancients. Genetic mutations are evidence, as they indicate c o n v e r s i o n.
 
 prospekt  08 Nov 2012 14:42
 Add a Comment
 
 
It is backed up by many facts and is know it's self a fact. Just give up creationist you have lost. All you can do know is nag.
 
 Kryten4000  22 Sep 2012 06:16
 1 Comment
 
 What facts ?
by  BiblicanB
 29 Sep 2012 18:39
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I do not believe that we came from monkeys, simply because there are still monkeys, but everyone and everything evolves in some way or another. You simply cannot argue with scientific evidence/fact. Just seems strange that you prefer opinion over fact.
 
 mscoxie  22 Aug 2012 23:31
 Add a Comment
 
 
Evolution is an important part in the world as we know it. If there was no evolution there would be know humans
 
 huge_mama  16 Aug 2012 04:19
 Add a Comment
 
 
So what we have done since we were monkeys is wrong? Nope!
 
 jdawg92  10 Jul 2012 09:22
 Add a Comment
 
 
Sorry, but the scientific evidence is overwhelming. But you're perfectly free to believe in talking snakes and forbidden fruit, if you chose.
 
 pollywog  12 Jun 2012 19:21
 Add a Comment
 
 
Evolution is reality and does exist. Whether or not some sort of God intended for evolution to exist is to be left to another debate. I will state, however, that I have proof of evolution and other sciences, but not of God. While it is true that I cannot disprove him, neither can a christian prove him. I can't disprove God any more than a christian can disprove that one of the personalities taken on by a person suffering from Dissociative identity disorder, which has decided to kill 42 innocent people with a wooden cooking spoon while naked is actually god acting through him.
 
 rewndude1  02 May 2012 08:48
 Add a Comment
 
 
Evolution is not wrong actually, it is very simple if you take the time to study it and not "research" it on your creationist forums. Evolution is this, before there was a society that cared about the inhabitants, there were loose hierarchical societies where the inhabitants with the lesser capabilities to survive in that environment would die off, so the ones who had the capabilities that were "superiour" in that environment lived on, and when they mated with other inhabitants that survived because they had "superiour" traits as well, the offspring of these two will have the traits of the parents and since environment varies, it is never constant to which traits are "superiour". But now that we have modern civilization we can care for everyone for the most part and that is a good thing, I detest social Darwinism.
 
 bridfu5150  28 Apr 2012 10:49
 Add a Comment
 
 
Can you imagine looking at a monkey and saying: "Hey, that's my great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great great grandpa"
 
 penguinboy  03 Apr 2012 16:56
 Add a Comment
 
 
Yea well there isnt exactly loads of evidence that god is real, infact there is nothing at all exept from the bible which anyone could have made up, There is evidence of evolution, strong evidence.
 
 floreos  16 Mar 2012 22:07
 Add a Comment
 
 
Evolution is a very strong theory that is widely supported because scientists have, in fact, given VERY STRONG evidence for it. Take a couple science and anthropology classes and get back to me when you're educated.
 
 ria13  19 Feb 2012 23:18
 Add a Comment
 
 
If no scientist has ever produced strong evidence to support Evolution then why do you go to a doctor when you are sick and not to a faith healer? Because medicine is a scientific field and faith healing is a placebo at best. And the whole of biology is based on Evolutionary theory by the way.
 
 punkphuck  26 Jan 2012 18:22
 Add a Comment
 
 
Darwin alone gave plenty of evidence and convinced a large portion of the world, who were previously creationists, that evolution is true. The only ones left have zero understanding of what evolution is and how it works, some of them willfully ignorant, and as a result they make up weak straw-man arguments.
 
 Vel  07 Jan 2012 00:25
 Add a Comment
 
 
Evolution is so true just the fact that it is a theory doesn't change my idea. Gravity is a theory that cannot be proved , so is pythagorean theorem, so is the triangle angle sum theory, they work in every case but cannot be proved because there are infinite combinations
 
 mcnejon0  21 Nov 2011 21:31
 Add a Comment
 
 
There is more evidence of evolution than God existing. It doesn't mean evolution is true.
 
 kalv  14 Nov 2011 23:46
 Add a Comment
 
 
How would U all know Its a Theory get what it means Theory isnt proven yet or proven wrong
 
 rhoking  18 Oct 2011 06:42
 Add a Comment
 
 
I have to say it does exist, because right now we do not have any other rational explanation.
 
 IWillTrump  22 Sep 2011 23:50
 4 Comments
 
 There's a reason why we have creationists...
by  Antares
 07 Nov 2011 04:30
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Sorry for the people who believe in religion, but there are examples of evolution such as the birds in galapagos islands.
 
 goodjay  26 Jul 2011 06:23
 Add a Comment
 
 
Evolution is a fact of this life.
 
 justsumguy  19 Jul 2011 17:03
 19 Comments
 
 "Evolution is a fact of this life."
I agree. Too bad macro-evolution isn't.
by  Stranger
 19 Jul 2011 17:26
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Evolution is not wrong and it was proved by Charles Darwin, founder of the evolution theory.
 
 erickwon35  06 Jul 2011 01:25
 3 Comments
 
 No, a theory isn't a proof.
by  Antares
 06 Jul 2011 01:42
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
35% for? Are you kidding me? When will people get an education?!?
 
 Occultdude  15 Jun 2011 00:38
 2 Comments
 
 One dunce's education is an independent thinker's indoctrination.
by  Stranger
 19 Jul 2011 17:17
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Lol evolution is proven to be right. And yes there like .4 or something between each species. Thats because when they evolve the old strand of dna breaks and over time dissaperers.
 
 jaiden190  03 Jun 2011 07:53
 1 Comment
 
 So where are all those "transitional" fossils. You know, the ones that died off, the half species?
by  Mr_Obvious
 19 Jul 2011 14:48
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Actually they have proved the evolution between horses timeline so you were wrong about that, and anyway they are imcompleted proof of evolution aswell in other organisms and in humans
 
 Chaaaz  19 May 2011 06:25
 1 Comment
 
 A horse is still a horse, a dog is still a dog, it doesn't matter if it's a bull mastiff or a chihuahua, it's still canine.
by  Mr_Obvious
 19 Jul 2011 14:50
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
It holds more proof than any religion
 
 redmaster  28 Mar 2011 09:56
 1 Comment
 
 It has no proof. It would be a fact if it did. Macro-evolution, I mean.
by  Stranger
 05 May 2011 16:28
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Teachers, we really need to do a better job educating the public. Look we have a D on this test question only 65% have chosen the right answer.
 
 Volans  28 Mar 2011 07:53
 2 Comments
 
 Step it up! The indoctrination is not strong enough! MORE DRILLS! REPEAT THE LIE UNTIL THEY BELIEVE IT!
by  Stranger
 05 May 2011 16:26
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I dunno, all the fossils and tools seem to be evidence for me. Besides, if you wanna get technical there is no evidence to support the creationism theory, it is based soley on belief.
 
 hasdass  05 Mar 2011 08:15
 1 Comment
 
 The same evidence is used by both sides. It's just INTERPRETED DIFFERENTLY.
by  Stranger
 05 May 2011 16:27
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Evolution is not wrong and I can prove it. I asked everyone to post their real pictures. Look at Verum he looks like he is still a monkey.
 
 artemis  05 Feb 2011 10:22
 1 Comment
 
 ha ha ha good one, Artemis :-D
by  debategal
 05 Feb 2011 11:17
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Evolution is not a belief. Religion is. Evolution is science. All you extremely religious people just don't want to believe it because it contradicts the bible that was written how many years ago? The bible is not science. Its just an explanation for everything that people don't know before all this real science existed. I'm not trying to insult the bible or anything, but I'm just saying religion shouldn't stop you from accepting the truth.
 
 kaley222  05 Feb 2011 10:20
 8 Comments
 
 evolution is for monkey-boys
by  debategal
 05 Feb 2011 11:59
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Evolution in every way, shape, and form has been qualitatively and quantitatively proven by scientists worldwide.
 
 Zolotros  04 Feb 2011 15:50
 1 Comment
 
 ssssh there are religious folk on this site
by  damselfly
 19 Jul 2011 15:11
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
You're a testicle in my eyes sunshine!
 
 proby96  08 Jan 2011 02:08
 Add a Comment
 
 
What a broad statement. I assume you're home-schooled by a parent who didn't complete college and doesn't believe in algebra, either.

Another broad, unfounded statement.
 
 Lynn  07 Jan 2011 13:06
 7 Comments
 
 I wasn't home-schooled. I was subjected to indoctrination attempts by the establishment in public schools. They tried to get me to believe that all species have a common ancestor, yet the absurd notion is unfalsifiable. And all of you are blind, willingly or unwittingly, of the fact that that makes the "theory" of "evolution" UNSCIENTIFIC.
by  Stranger
 05 May 2011 16:24
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Actually scientists do have a whole lot of proof and evidence that makes it undeniable that evolution and the process of natural selection occured so I'm not sure where you get your facts from that no scientist has any proof. I would also like to see some cold, hard evidence that God exists instead of people just justifying their claims by having a bash at the theory of evolution.

There may be some gaps in our knowledge about it but that doesn't mean we have to use the same old method of using God to just fill the gaps in and make excuses.
 
 Octopus212  07 Jan 2011 12:31
 Add a Comment
 
136 More Responses
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
To Not Belive In Evolution Is To Not Belive In Natural Selection
Interstellar Travel Will Be Possible By The Year 2150.
God Can't Be Omnipotent
Scientology's ZEN Is Quite A Major New Revelation In The "GOD" PHENOMENON
I'm Changing Phylum From Homo Sapien To Hetero Erectus Giganticus
The Big Bangs Rule Out Atheism
Evolution Is True And Creation Is False.
The First Step In Understanding The Universe Is Not Through Physics But Through Neuroscience.
Not Teaching Children The Flaws Of Evolution Is An Embarrassment To Science
The New Advancement About To Be Announced In 3D Nocular Vision Screens Will Make All TV, Monitors, And...
New Debates
Finals And State Tests Put Too Much Pressure On Kids.
Save The World!
Racism Against Australian Aboriginals Should Stop
Different School Uniform!
What Type Is Sylveon (pokemon) Going To Be?
Pokemon Is For Kids
Are You Feeling Happy Right Now?
Europe Should Have An European FBI
Italy Is A Cooler Place Than Spain
It Is Better To Be Formally Unequal And Informally Equal Than To Be Formally Equal And Informally Unequal...