|
To find out if evolution is true or not read the first verse of the bible. Gen 1:1 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Ugh.. I wanna neutral column.
Guess what time it is? ANALOGY TIME!!! Yay!!!
OK, here we go. I have a theory that a watermelon is blue inside, but when you cut it it bleeds and
turns red. Now, my hypothesis may or may not be true... Does anyone have any way of proving or
disproving me?
Now, apply the same to the evolutionary hypothesis... No one can prove nor disprove it, but I tend
to lean towards creationism, because there is one Book (The Bible) that says it isn't true... But I
think most people wouldn't accept that. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
If humans evolved from apes, but to get there we had the Neanderthal to bridge the gap and if
survival of the fittest is really a true and solid thing to believe in, then why have Neanderthals
become extinct? Surely apes should've died out first considering they are the weaker species? |
| |
dan  24 Jul 2008 21:33
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Even Darwin changed his mind on this subject in the end. I wonder if eventually saw the Great
Creator's hand in everything? |
| |
joe9  10 Jul 2008 18:42
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
If evolution were true, why did it stop? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
There are many scientists that give strong points for evolution. Well there there's not enough proof
out there that we just poped outta the sky . And plus look at wisdom teeth in the next 4-10 yeas
people wont have them because we don't need them evolution is growing to this day. We will evolve
into greater species one day. (oh shoot i meant theis to be against. And if your asking why I'm
complaining about this will I'm finishing typing its because its already posed and I'm editing it :)
) |
| |
Pure  16 May 2008 06:17
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Any one here who is a sports fan knows that all records will continue to be broken. This is due to
the constant and changing evolution of athletes conditioning and the equipment they use. That is a
very simple way of explaining continual evolution. But as a christian i must ask why when the story
of adam and eve and the snake in the garden, is brought up,,,the beginning of man....why is the
theory of the pre-adamite world not discussed? God said to adam and eve to go forth and replenish
the earth. How can one refill something unless it has been emptied. I cannot replenish the water in
a glass unless there was water to begin with but is now gone or has been emptied. The minerals in
the soil that a farmer cultivates cannot be replenished until the minerals there are first used up.
Maybe that is a discussion for another debate. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
We learn we don't evolve we are just are affect by the evils in the world as soon as Adam and eve
were thrown out of the garden of Eden |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
There is a space missing in the chart of evolution so it is possible that evolution is wrong |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
The theory of evolution posits a process of self-transformation from simple life forms to more
complex life forms, which has never been observed or duplicated in a laboratory.Professor of Botany
at the University of Lund in Sweden, stated: "My attempts to demonstrate Evolution by an experiment
carried on for more than 40 years have completely failed. At least, I should hardly be accused of
having started from a preconceived antievolutionary standpoint." In respect to the creation versus
evolution controversy, the fossil record does not support the theory of evolution and is one of the
flaws in theory of evolution.Currently, there are over one hundred million identified and cataloged
fossils in the world's museums.[63] If the theory of evolution was valid, then there should be
"transitional forms" in the fossil record reflecting the intermediate life forms. Another term for
these "transitional forms" is "missing links".Darwin himself admitted that his theory required the
existence of "transitional forms." Darwin wrote: "So that the number of intermediate and
transitional links, between all living and extinct species, must have been inconceivably great. But
assuredly, if this theory be true, such have lived upon the earth.""[Darwin] was embarrassed by the
fossil record because it didn't look the way he predicted it would .... Well, we are now about 120
years after Darwin, and knowledge of the fossil record has been greatly expanded. We now have a
quarter of a million fossil species but the situation hasn't changed much. ... [W]e have even fewer
examples of evolutionary transition than we had in Darwin's time." - David M. Raup, Given the fact
of evolution, one would expect the fossils to document a gradual steady change from one ancestral
form to the descendants. But this is not what the paleontologist finds. Instead, he or she finds
gaps in just about every phyletic series. New types often appear quite suddenly, and their immediate
ancestors are absent in the geological strata. The discovery of unbroken series of species changing
gradually into descending species is very rare. Indeed the fossil record is one of discontinuities,
seemingly documenting jumps (saltations) from one type of organism to a different type. This raises
a puzzling question: Why does the fossil record fail to reflect the gradual change one would expect
from evolution?"Fossil evidence of human evolutionary history is fragmentary and open to various
interpretations. Fossil evidence of chimpanzee evolution is absent altogether". Henry Gee.Since
World War II a majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the theory of evolution which
employs methodological naturalism have been atheists.The theory of evolution is a naturalistic
theory of the history of life on earth And the definition of theory is a guess or conjecture that
has not been tested.
Seems like you need to do more research for you try to make ppl believe something that hasn't even
been proven. |
| |
|
| |
| | | |