|
It is wrong
and for you people that want to believe that you came from a monkey you're on your own you freak |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
The theory of evolution contradicts the Bible and I am so for the Bible. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It is about 40,000,000,000 to one that it is right! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I don't believe that monkies can evolve to humans, and that dinosaurs can evolve to birds. It's been
many, many years since then, perhaps even millions years, and we humans still share the same
physical attribute.
And yes, if you truly believe that we evolved from monkies, thanks for locking them up in cages at
the zoo.
However, all things are necessary to know, is what I believe. It's worth knowing what evolution is
about. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
The theory of evolution is the persistent progressional change of all life forms in which small
variances from one generation to the next unconsciously conspire to evolve itself to better suit the
conditions presented to the species.
Thus, all species are in a transitional state that never rests into perpetuity. That being said it
should be odd that ANY fossils of the same species would be alike in manner within the vast fossil
record considering how infrequent a perspective fossil would find itself the beneficiary of the
unlikely matter of events that takes a such snapshot in time. But the contrary is true in as much
that all species within the fossil record appear suddenly without previous representation and just
as suddenly disappear void of any transitional manifestations or advantageous improvements that
evolution relies upon.
Scientists can only point to two representative fossils and draw an unscientific unproven conclusion
that one evolved into the other. In fact there are innumerable examples of this. But, the one
thing that doesn't exist in all of creation and the vast fossil record *IS THE FOSSIL IN BETWEEN
THOSE TWO*!!!! Likenesses or similarities between species doesnt suggest evolution but instead
suggests a common creator using likewise body structures and bio systems. Commonalities in design
are the product of a common designer. Thus, when one finds two similar examples of an animal it is
meaningless. The only thing that gives evolution credible legs to stand on is a succession of
fossils that demonstrate an evolutionary timeline. NOTHING like this exists in the least in the
fossil record. Of all of the millions of species not one single example can be shown of multiple
succeding fossils.
Scientist stick to the world of unfamiliar and vague species to hang their hat on in the evolution
lie. Why? Because its easier to make a sales pitch using scientific vernacular and long extinct
reptiles and shellfish than it is to work in the realm of the understandable and familiar. In short,
there are no "almost" elephants. No "almost giraffes". For evolution to be true one should find
innumerable giraffes of varying stages of evolution. It should be rare that two are the same. Yet
all are the same. There are no exceptions. Period. Again, the scientists ply their trade
utilizing the vague and plausible and unfamiliar species to hoodwink everyone.
The only thing that can be gleaned from the fossil record are implied or coincidental similarities
that fall radically short of a hundred million year progression of successively improved archetypes
within the same species line. If evolution were valid the entire fossil record would consist of
almost entirely different and varied subsequent species over the eons. Exactly the opposite is
true, and that is the entire fossil record is static and unvaried. The fact is, you can go out and
dig up some saber tooth tiger bones and they will be exactly like all those dug up before. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I agree god created everything and everybody |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
You know what i don't think it makes sense either. I know the neanderthals were our ancestors, and
somehow they evolved and so.......became smarter and less stronger than they were. It doesn't make
sense. It's like a micro species came out of water, had butt sex with a bug, and that thing had butt
sex with a monkey, and that had even more butt sex with a monkey and that became a neanderthal and
that neanderthal somehow became a human being like us....i dunno |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Science did it for the lulz |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Amen breteren |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I believe that humans can mentally evolve, but not physically. Like for instance, half a dozen words
used in common speech today were swear words back in the '60's. Also new ideas and new thoughts are
springing up every day. That's why I think humans are getting smarter, not physically changing. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Yes.
Because, "In the beginning God created heaven and earth. The earth was without form and void, and
darkness was upon the face of the deep. And God said, 'Let there be light', and there was light."
(Genesis 1:1) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
God created the earth in six days according to Genesis. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No, i don't believe in evolution. Evolution dis-credits the intelligent Creator in favor of blind
chance. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It is proven that it was just a random idea that Darwin had when he was in a boat at an island. He
was just writing his thoughts in his journal. I just wonder how it became such a big thing as it is
now? It all sounds stupid to me |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Look I will put this as simply as I can. God created this World period. Evolution is a fairy tale.
Now if you want to believe in evolution that's fine with me, but remember the bible says" it is
appointed onto man once to die and then the judgement" so if you want to believe in evolution you
better be prepared to tell God he is wrong someday. I truly feel sorry for evolutionist. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I don't have enough faith to believe in evolution. Believing that we came from a rock just seems
crazy to me. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
The chances that one cell evolved into another cell is HIGHLY unlikely. As one scientist puts it:
"The probability that one cell evolves into another has the same probability of a tornado sweeping
through a junk yard and forming a 747 from scrap metal."
Also, most scientists agree that the Earth was formed 4.7 billion years ago. The time it would take
for a trilobite (one of the most simplests forms of life) to evolve into a Human Being would take
trillions of years. Not 4.7 billion. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Evolution, and creation, like archaeology, and crime scene investigation are deductive sciences.
They posit a theory, and then search for the proofs. The problem arrives when they find answers that
don't tell them what they want to hear. Both sides of this question are guilty of wrongly
interpreting evidence, or of rejecting a priori, evidence that is applicable to the question,
because it doesn't work within the limits of their theory.
In deductive sciences, the way to find which theory is the most plausible, or probable (because the
only way to be 100% sure is to be able to return back in time to when it actually happened and to
observe it.), is to compile the evidence for both sides, and see which side applies properly the
most amount of evidence, from all of the domains of science and philosophy.
One problem that comes into the picture is that when we debate this problem, our presuppositions
often take control, and we refuse to listen to the arguments of the other side.
I found it interesting to recently find out that in North America, there is a very small community
of Astrophysicists (Carl Sagan was a part of this community), and the majority of the community
believe that God created the universe (evidently Carl Sagan was not part of this majority). This
fact is interesting because these scientists deal with the stars, and especially with what evidence
our universe gives us of it's beginning. Astrophysicists are unanimous that the universe began with
a "bang". Philosophers will tell us that every thing that has a beginning must have a creator.
Aristotle speaks of the unmoved mover. (Someone might ask the rather unphilosophical question, "well
if everything that exists needs a cause, who caused God?" I will answer right now, that neither I,
nor the philosopher who first realised this ever said that "everything that exists needs a cause",
but everything that has a beginning, in other words, everything that is finite. God, by definition
is infinite, which means that he had no beginning. But, that's another debate.) Therefore,
philosophically speaking, if the universe had a beginning, it therefore had a cause. If you want to
know more, read aristotle on the different types of causes.
Time is short, so, I'll just finish with a simple observation. If evolution is true, then the
universe is eternal. However, science has shown us that the universe cannot be eternal (2nd law of
thermodynamics). Scientests have tried to get around this fact by positing a theory where the
universe is in constant fluctuation. An interesting theory, but inconsistent with the 2nd law of
thermodynamics. When all the usable energy is used up, we will not have energy for another "bounce."
Whatever the case, I must go, these are some of the reasons why I think that evolution is wrong.
However, I haven't read all the books yet, I'm currently working through Richard Dawkins, "the blind
watchmaker," which is so far, quite interesting. Until next time. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Evolution is a religion. Evolution is the faith of atheism because it replaces God with man. When
you've conned yourself into believing that some kind of ancient slime morphed into progressively
complex and directional life forms, you are in the realm of faith, not science.
The religion of evolution has its own doctrines, traditions, lifestyle, and culture. Social
Darwinism is the logical extension of the theory of evolution, which manifests itself in many
different philosophies and religions. Examples of these are:
* The "do your own thing" philosophy.
* The "survival of the fittest, and I am the fittest" mentality.
* The "rugged individual" type of capitalism (like Ayn Rand).
* New Age movement.
* Marxism.
* Socialism.
* Racism.
* Nazism.
Hitler worshiped and was worshiped |
| |
 v00v  05 Sep 2008 03:24
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
To find out if evolution is true or not read the first verse of the bible. Gen 1:1 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Ugh.. I wanna neutral column.
Guess what time it is? ANALOGY TIME!!! Yay!!!
OK, here we go. I have a theory that a watermelon is blue inside, but when you cut it it bleeds and
turns red. Now, my hypothesis may or may not be true... Does anyone have any way of proving or
disproving me?
Now, apply the same to the evolutionary hypothesis... No one can prove nor disprove it, but I tend
to lean towards creationism, because there is one Book (The Bible) that says it isn't true... But I
think most people wouldn't accept that. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
If humans evolved from apes, but to get there we had the Neanderthal to bridge the gap and if
survival of the fittest is really a true and solid thing to believe in, then why have Neanderthals
become extinct? Surely apes should've died out first considering they are the weaker species? |
| |
 dan 24 Jul 2008 21:33
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Even Darwin changed his mind on this subject in the end. I wonder if eventually saw the Great
Creator's hand in everything? |
| |
 joe9 10 Jul 2008 18:42
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
If evolution were true, why did it stop? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
There are many scientists that give strong points for evolution. Well there there's not enough proof
out there that we just poped outta the sky . And plus look at wisdom teeth in the next 4-10 yeas
people wont have them because we don't need them evolution is growing to this day. We will evolve
into greater species one day. (oh shoot i meant theis to be against. And if your asking why I'm
complaining about this will I'm finishing typing its because its already posed and I'm editing it :)
) |
| |
 Pure 16 May 2008 06:17
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Any one here who is a sports fan knows that all records will continue to be broken. This is due to
the constant and changing evolution of athletes conditioning and the equipment they use. That is a
very simple way of explaining continual evolution. But as a christian i must ask why when the story
of adam and eve and the snake in the garden, is brought up,,,the beginning of man....why is the
theory of the pre-adamite world not discussed? God said to adam and eve to go forth and replenish
the earth. How can one refill something unless it has been emptied. I cannot replenish the water in
a glass unless there was water to begin with but is now gone or has been emptied. The minerals in
the soil that a farmer cultivates cannot be replenished until the minerals there are first used up.
Maybe that is a discussion for another debate. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
We learn we don't evolve we are just are affect by the evils in the world as soon as Adam and eve
were thrown out of the garden of Eden |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
There is a space missing in the chart of evolution so it is possible that evolution is wrong |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
The theory of evolution posits a process of self-transformation from simple life forms to more
complex life forms, which has never been observed or duplicated in a laboratory.Professor of Botany
at the University of Lund in Sweden, stated: "My attempts to demonstrate Evolution by an experiment
carried on for more than 40 years have completely failed. At least, I should hardly be accused of
having started from a preconceived antievolutionary standpoint." In respect to the creation versus
evolution controversy, the fossil record does not support the theory of evolution and is one of the
flaws in theory of evolution.Currently, there are over one hundred million identified and cataloged
fossils in the world's museums.[63] If the theory of evolution was valid, then there should be
"transitional forms" in the fossil record reflecting the intermediate life forms. Another term for
these "transitional forms" is "missing links".Darwin himself admitted that his theory required the
existence of "transitional forms." Darwin wrote: "So that the number of intermediate and
transitional links, between all living and extinct species, must have been inconceivably great. But
assuredly, if this theory be true, such have lived upon the earth.""[Darwin] was embarrassed by the
fossil record because it didn't look the way he predicted it would .... Well, we are now about 120
years after Darwin, and knowledge of the fossil record has been greatly expanded. We now have a
quarter of a million fossil species but the situation hasn't changed much. ... [W]e have even fewer
examples of evolutionary transition than we had in Darwin's time." - David M. Raup, Given the fact
of evolution, one would expect the fossils to document a gradual steady change from one ancestral
form to the descendants. But this is not what the paleontologist finds. Instead, he or she finds
gaps in just about every phyletic series. New types often appear quite suddenly, and their immediate
ancestors are absent in the geological strata. The discovery of unbroken series of species changing
gradually into descending species is very rare. Indeed the fossil record is one of discontinuities,
seemingly documenting jumps (saltations) from one type of organism to a different type. This raises
a puzzling question: Why does the fossil record fail to reflect the gradual change one would expect
from evolution?"Fossil evidence of human evolutionary history is fragmentary and open to various
interpretations. Fossil evidence of chimpanzee evolution is absent altogether". Henry Gee.Since
World War II a majority of the most prominent and vocal defenders of the theory of evolution which
employs methodological naturalism have been atheists.The theory of evolution is a naturalistic
theory of the history of life on earth And the definition of theory is a guess or conjecture that
has not been tested.
Seems like you need to do more research for you try to make ppl believe something that hasn't even
been proven. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
If we evolved from monkeys, why are there still monkeys today?
Did they decide not to evolve?
Did their conversation go like this?:
"hey, fred, what are you doing tonight?"
"oh, i think i'll evolve! What are you doing?"
"well, tara said that she won't love me if i evolve, so i'm not going to."
"man, just for a girl? Just think, you could have disposable thumbs!"
"nah, i love her too much to let her go, even if it means that i can't have disposable thumbs."
"ok, it's your choice!"
-conversation written by:courtney aka:i'm_trumpet |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No b/c us coming from freaking monkeys!? That's just dumb! What did the monkeys fall out of the
trees then just magically learn how to talk? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Its simple. God created the earth and everything in it. Obviously the people who believe this
ridiculous theory are the monkeys they supposedly evolved from! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Evolution is wrong! If we evolved from monkeys then why is the monkey population booming why are
there still monkeys? |
| |
 MM92 18 Apr 2008 01:36
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Evolution is wrong.
I am a Christian, and I believe that we were made by the Lord God, and was made in His own image. I
certainly do not believe that my great-great-great-great-great-great-great-great grandfather was a
monkey and we are now man. NO! And that oh my family was a monkey 3 billion years ago, or mine was a
fish! NO. We were made my God the creator.
Now, there are some birds today that do evolve but not into humans or different creatures. They
evolve because where they live the weather changes drastically and they grow and lose parts
depending on the weather.
But yes I think evolution is wrong when it comes to we humans evolved from monkeys. God created
everything and every living creature. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Based solely on your debate you are wrong. There is much evidence of evolution such as fossils,
carbon dating, and skeletal remains. So as to the debate the number of votes is not relevant as by
your own premise you are wrong because there is evidence. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I applaud the creationists for their tenacity but through evolution they will die out
the world is still flat though , isn't it ??????? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Evolution is a science meaning it has evidence to back up it's claims. It is a possible explanation
of how things came to be. It will never be 100% right nor will it be 100% wrong. Unlike your "god"
who has no proof what so ever of even existing. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Wow, I can't believe I never commented on this debate. I can't see evolution being wrong unless one
were to say that nature was wrong. It seems more appropriate to say that evolution is not factual;
it is a well received and agreed upon theory of how we came to be, but I wouldn't see evolution as
wrong...quite the opposite really. I hope that humans continue to evolve to give us a chance to
better ourselves, both physically and mentally. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
If evolution dose not happen give me the real reason on what happens!
And don't give me any god stuff am totally unreligious and don't think any of that stuff is
possibul. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
The argument about evolution form the god squad side is always the same, but why is it that your
camp continues to fail to look at the length of time it takes for species to adapt to their new
surroundings. If you can't prove something to the last quark in the opinion of the god-ies, and
most of all in their life times then it most be wrong. Get real, the need for adaptation to
environment leads to evolution bible thumpers it's the natural order of the world. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Sigh... Randy orton, batista, triple h, ric flair... Evolution. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
There is LOTS of evidence of evolution.
The idea that some big man with a beard created the Earth, the moon, the sun etc., and then what,
did he just put dinosaur fossils in the groud for a laugh? So he could enjoy watching us be
confused? If yes then he's a twisted old man! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
There definitely is a such thing as evolution and I'm sure there are hundreds of scientists in
heaven cursing your name for thinking that they cant prove evolution happened. Not only does it
happen over long periods of time, you see that it happens in our own timeframe too, as humans have
gotten taller over the years, based on the theory that those who are short are more unlikely to
reproduce
I think that, on a larger note, that things should be taken much more seriously about this.
Evolution can definitely be proven through the fossil and ice record, but the ignorance here is
astounding. Even though we know it exists, there are far too many here, and elsewhere that can't
agree on a scientific principal. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Humans did not evolve from monkeys. Humans are more closely related to modern apes than to monkeys,
but we didn't evolve from apes, either. Humans share a common ancestor with modern African apes,
like gorillas and chimpanzees. Scientists believe this common ancestor existed
5 to 8 million years ago. Shortly thereafter, the species diverged into two separate lineages. One
of these lineages ultimately evolved into gorillas and chimps, and the other evolved into early
human ancestors called hominids.
Homo Sapiens (Humans) genetically are still about 98% chimpanzee. Different species branched off and
evolved differently according to the conditions around them. We either adapt or become extinct. In a
way, one could say that humans are just one of the monkey-type species that still exist today
It was a different kind of monkey that turned into men and they are extinct now. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Although the evolution theory hasn't explained every little thing yet, it's still the most rational
theory out there. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Humans are changing in both ways. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Oh and what would you put in it's place creationism? Uhhh, NO! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
The easiest way for people to understand evolution is to first know that the larger the species, the
slower the adaptation (evolution) happens. Therefore the simplest way to explain it is with
germs/bacteria and the immune system. You get chickenpox, for example...You (your body) gets sick
until your immune system fights it off. The white blood cells then ADAPT to recognize that
particular invader and you will (in almost all cases) NEVER get sick from chickenpox again.
A similar example is MRSA (superbugs). They have adapted to become resistant to most anti-biotics.
Anti-biotics have been used for decades. This is not even a generation in human terms. However to
bacteria, represents literally THOUSANDS of generations. EVOLUTION was a slow process in the
lifespan of a bacteria (hours to days of life), but relatively quick in our lifespan. If you have
ever had chickenpox, yet deny the existence of evolution, then just haven't been living with you
eyes open. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
There is A LOT of evidence that points toward evolution. Or else it wouldn't be so highly regarded
by scientists everywhere. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
How can you prove that evolution is wrong. Evolution is happening all the time, although it takes
about millions of years. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
WTF i know this comment isn't about evolution even thought it is definately correct, it is about the
silly people who have voted for it and have put idiotic comments why they think it is wrong. Its
very scary people still think that there is a god and he created everything in 6 days for one a day
is said to be from morning to night from the earth spinning around on its axis therefore how did god
create everything in 6 days as days wouldn't of existed when god was suppose to create everything
plus days are completely different on each planet this shows that a simple person had written this
its just a major flaw that shows religion is wrong because it shows that it was made by a bunch of
people who knew nothing everything that is said about a so called god is wrong as it was written by
a HUMAN being it is a rubbish theory to how everything began.
. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It is physically impossible that humans magically sprang up from the dirt and started to inherit the
earth, so that only leaves evolution. But the Bible never says how God created humans, so it very
well could be that evolution is God's doing, just like the Big Bang Theory. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Seriously? I cant believe were still having debates over this topic! It only makes logical sense
that we have evolved! Where else do you think we came from? You think that god just decided to
create us all one day? I don't think so! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
"There is no scientist can give strong evidence to support evolution"
Oh except that tricky evidence part. I know it takes effort to look for evidence - but that doesn't
mean we should give up and go home. How about the evidence of the fossil record - fossil after
fossil in a line showing the progression of evolution from one stage to the next. Or maybe the
correlation between this evidence and the evidence of genetics - how we can use both genetics and
the fossil record to draw a tree-diagram of any part of the animal kingdom, going back millennia,
and both methods will match. How we can accurately date two skeletons of pre-humans, one with a
larger head than the other, and know for certain that the one with the larger brain came after the
smaller brained pre-human.
So yes you're right there is no evidence - evolution really is the most ridiculous load of nonsense. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Evolution isn't wrong, even the Vatican says that you can believe in it and still be Catholic. The
time line maybe a little skewed though. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
You have to be kidding. There is plenty of evidence. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
There is slight proof in the Smithsonian. A fish that has features resembling other animals. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
We can observe microorganisms involved in our lifetime. That is why antibiotics don't work after a
while because the non resistant organisms die out and the resistant ones remain and have adapted to
the new climate which is what evolution is. We can also see evolution in plants and animals to an
extent within our lifetime where the organisms with the most suitable characteristics survive.
I'm not sure that overzealous religious people understand evolution, I only have a GCSE in biology
for this level of understanding. Evolution in fact has almost nothing to do with God as it does
nothing to disprove the existence of God (does not explain how things were created) but just
contradicts certain interpretations of religion
Evolution just seems like the most rational argument as, if God created everything as it were, how
come we have observed changes happen and that are happening? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Evolution doesn't exist. If people came from monkeys, gorillas, then they wouldn't be here now.
All gorillas would have evolved. It's also blasphemous to say evolution did exist. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
This is always a false dlemma.
There's no reason that there couldn't be a divine hand "guiding" evolution. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
All those for should arrange to meet and have their own private BIG BANG.For the more enlightened
voters one of the clearest examples of evolution can be seen with some of the cruel results from
pedigree dog breeding.Indeed this is devolution which results in strong breeds such as bulldogs
reduced to wheezing wrecks within 3 generations or so. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
How can we say that evolution is wrong? We may not have 100% proof of the line of evolution but
neither do we have proof that God exists. Some people may say that proof is in the bible but that
at the end of the day it is only a book. There are thousands of books out there that state the
existence of evolution. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Evolution is pretty much proven, the only reasonmany people still call it a theory is because the
people who have studied it are often more open-minded and therefore are unwilling to say I KNOW IT
IS CORRECT, they instead say "I believe this is the most logical explanation for the variety of
lifeforms we have"
I am assuming the only people who don't agree with the evolution theory (excluding those who either
don't understand it/have not heard of it/don't care) only disagree because their religion states the
earth and all thing was created by their god/allah/hours etc etc.
I would love...LOVE...to debate with a christian or religious person about this, as long as they
don't us their holy literature as absolute proof. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
There is overwhelming physical and observable evidence of the gradual process of evolution. I would
like to see some of this evidence for when people try to prove that God is fact. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
For those who do not believe in evolution, I must say that I am impressed at their ignorance. Proof?
How about the millions of years of geological evidence found throughout the globe? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
