» Home » Food & Drink
Eating Contest Should Be Banned
Over eating is not healthy and should not be advocated. Just recently, a 34 year old man died from cake-eating contest.
 uberlovely  25 Feb 2008 13:24
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
Especially hard boiled eggs...;-)
 
 keepmindok  04 Sep 2008 03:55
 Add a Comment
 
 
It should be banned because of obesity and starving people are out in this world....
Eating contests are a disgrace... It is not entertainment at all.....
I think It should be banned....
 
 xtaz4evax  07 May 2008 10:07
 Add a Comment
 
 
Eating contests are the most stupid use of food in the world today, especially with millions of underfed children everywhere, even in rich countries.
You can DIE if you overeat to win a prize, or for a two-minute stint on TV...
 
 Garamond  29 Apr 2008 14:34
 Add a Comment
 
 
Definitely. With starving people in this world, we can't profess to being so helpful and caring when we're still wasting food in such a stupid manner.
 
 veggiefry  21 Apr 2008 14:32
 Add a Comment
 
 
It is a complete waste of food, and really it's just disgusting, not entertaining at all.
 
 gogo303ng  17 Apr 2008 10:02
 Add a Comment
 
 
It encourages people to eat more to the extreme of becoming obese..
 
 melisiwa  11 Mar 2008 01:37
 Add a Comment
 
 
They cause people to over eat- It is bad for your digestive system.
 
 huntcowboy  07 Mar 2008 03:52
 Add a Comment
 
 
I agree. They should ban all food eating contests. What is the purpose of it? If you think about it, it is just a bunch of nonsense. It is nasty and it is dangerous. Nothing is grosser that watching some overweight person cram food into their mouth. It is also healthy because the people do not take the time to chew up the food properly and they could damage their esophagus or stomach. For example, there are some Japanese people who think that eating many hotdogs is fun. It is sick. I do not see the fun in eating to make yourself sick. Therefore, I strongly believe that all food eating contests should definitely be banned all around the world.
 
 Professor  26 Feb 2008 23:51
 2 Comments
 
 Just because you don't understand the purpose of something doesn't mean it should be banned. I don't understand french, but I don't want it banned. Just don't watch.... how difficult would that really be?
by  openurmind
 01 Mar 2008 23:00
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Yes they should. Like Mackenzie said, food shouldn't be wasted when there are people who are in need of it. It is a pointless activity, which has tragically cost this 34 year old man his life. It is a shame that he was unaware of the dangers of consuming large quantities of food.

There is no point in holding and participating in dangerous competitions such as these. Anyone who considers holding such an event, such as people who may use it for a fundraising event, should think about the dangers that it could bring and focus on something more sensible.
 
 louise23  25 Feb 2008 19:45
 Add a Comment
 
 
Eating contests should certainly be banned. What occurred to 34 year old Adam Deeley of Birmingham is tragic and should serve as a stark warning to people who would consider taking part in eating contests, as well as to organizers of these events. I think that simple common sense would suggest that eating so much food and in such a short period of time is unhealthy and potentially fatal. Not only are you likely to get ill from eating so much, but there is also a risk of choking. This is true of cakes, but also of hot dog eating contests, which are very popular in some parts of the world.

There is another reason why eating contests should be banned and this one has less to do with health and more to do with ethics. Millions of people around the world live under the shadow of starvation. As such, it seems really excessive and even immoral for wealthier societies to waste food in this manner, when others would be so happy to receive it, simply for survival.
 
 mackenzie  25 Feb 2008 14:35
 Add a Comment
 
 
Just dont join them if you think their bad its not like they're manditory... I personally like them because i love food
 
 coolioz15  15 Dec 2009 13:00
 Add a Comment
 
 
There should be a contest to see who can eat the most uberlovely
 
 ur_wrong  09 Jun 2008 04:20
 Add a Comment
 
 
Bigger people are going to eat whether you want them to or not...they choose when they eat and what they eat..no one else...so eating contests shouldnt be banned because its someones choice just like if you choose NOT to participate
 
 zero1again  26 Mar 2008 23:53
 Add a Comment
 
 
First of all its entertainment and entertainment is to be enjoyed not criticized and furthermore not that many eating contests really go on!
 
 ambercol  03 Mar 2008 15:33
 Add a Comment
 
 
It is one's own responsibility to regulate how much he or she eats. Furthermore, all competitors and only them claim responsibility for their eating, and it is their decision whether or not they want to partake in the competition and/or eat lots.
 
 chilipadi  03 Mar 2008 03:54
 Add a Comment
 
 
Who would enforce such a ban? Are you suggesting the federal government should regulate the food intake of individuals? There is no other entity that could uphold a ban on eating contests and this falls well outside of the constitutional authority of the U.S..... So far.
 
 openurmind  01 Mar 2008 22:58
 Add a Comment
 
 
Eating contests don't need to be banned there at your own risk
 
 vgking13  28 Feb 2008 18:11
 Add a Comment
 
 
Eating contests make people feel pleasure because they make them full. Also, eating contests make people feel good when they win. Even if they lose,, they still ate a lot, so they feel very comfortable and happy.
 
 Serin  28 Feb 2008 02:22
 Add a Comment
 
 
This should be left up to the individual. People make decisions all the time about bad habits. And there are plenty of contests that involve what's bad for us. Too much alcohol, for instance. But people can think for themselves, and it should be the hope that they'll make good choices.
 
 Chell  27 Feb 2008 17:57
 Add a Comment
 
 
I just think there should be a weight limit.
You must be 60 pounds, at least five and a half feet tall, over the age of 18 and have no home.
 
 jaredp  26 Feb 2008 22:28
 Add a Comment
 
 
It's not really clear he died from the cake-eating contest. He died from choking on his food. People choke on their food and die all the time. It just so happened that this person did it during a cake-eating contest.

Your argument about the frivolity of using food for contests could just as well be spun in different ways. For example, if you are arguing that it is wrong for us to indulge ourselves in non-survival related activities while others are struggling to survive, you could just as well say that no one should experience any kind of entertainment such as watching films or playing computer games. Rather, they should save the money instead and send it to Africa.

Also, as mothers often say to their children when they are reluctant to eat all their food, just think of those starving people in Africa who don't have enough food. The act of consuming food rather than letting it be wasted is actually a kind of spiritual homage to the starving hordes of Africa. In the case of this cake-eating contest, the food was left over at the end of a party. So, if it had not been consumed, it would have been wasted. Surely you don't seriously believe the cakes would have been wrapped up and sent to Africa, remaining fresh enough to be eaten till they arrived? Perhaps the dead man was mindful of what his mother told him when he was a child and wanted to eat up all the food in homage to the starving.

Eating vast quantities of food in a short space of time may even be beneficial for health. Dietitians sometimes talk of the "starvation gene" - a metabolic process that kicks in once a person experiences extreme hunger, causing the body to use energy more efficiently. This process continues long after the hunger has been satisfied. It can make it very difficult for some people to lose weight because their body is permanently running in starvation mode, using energy ultra-efficiently. It's possible that eating vast quantities of food quickly will have the opposite effect, causing the body's metabolism to speed up and energy to be burned more quickly. If activated, this process would help a person remain slim and healthy throughout their life.
 
 Hidell  26 Feb 2008 00:08
 1 Comment
 
 Very interesting arguement although I can't agree with you
by  uberlovely
 26 Feb 2008 11:50
Comment
  
Comment
  
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
All Genders Are Equal.
Pina Colada Is Far More Preferable To Beer.
There Should Be More Recipes Available For Vegans.
Too Much Ice-Cream Is Bad For You
Home-Made Pumpkin Pies Are Better Than Store-Bought Pies
The US Is The Fattest Country In The World
Adults Should Be Allowed To Eat Off The Kids Menu
Chips Are Better Than Chocolate
Foreign Beer Is Better Than Domestic Beer.
McDonalds Is Good
New Debates
People Who Haven't Watched The Movie, Read The Book, Or Heard The Song Shouldn't Criticize The Movie,...
Government Healthcare Good Or Bad
Is Hydrogen Poroxide A Good Ingredien For Experiments Like Elephant Toothpaste.
MacDonalds Should Be Banned
Porche 911 Turbo Is A Noticable Car On The Streets.
If You Meet An Alien It Will Suck Out Your Brains.
Chicken Is Nice
That My Brother Doesn't Have A Dick
That Modern Technology Is A Plague On Human Relationships
Technology Is Tearing Us A Criminal