|
My question would be, why is there a need for abortion with all the birth control that is available?
Please don't tell me birth control doesn't always work. There is a very small percentage of time
that it does not work. That being said, I have heard so many women say "I got pregnant on the
pill." All I can say is Bull. If that many people used the pill and still got pregnant then they
would have taken it off the market years ago. It's a simple matter of irresponsibility. If
people would be responsible (men and women) there would be very little need for abortion. By the
way, I too believe it is murder. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Correct, it is also why it is the dilema for the mother and will ultimately be her conscious choice
and decision. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
The depressing part of the entire abortion issue is that, the pro choice people will support the
killing of any person that is deemed unwanted by a law, regardless of age. History is a great
teacher, a teacher that most pay no attention to. |
| |
 v00v  18 Aug 2009 02:06
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Hey, I have a question everyone...
Are eggs in chickens like abortion. Eggs that don't hatch and are commercialized for man to eat, or
is that too early since the fetus hasn't developed in the egg yet?
So baby fetus in a woman is a matter of time.
There are two ways to argue the fetus thing.
Time is consequential on this being evil or not. Or It is right 100% of the time or wrong 100% of
the time like a black or white issue.
Which is it? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Even though I'm Pro-Choice I do indeed agree it comes down to a woman choosing to kill the fetus
inside her.
* * * * *
I just want to add something I've stated in these debates in the past which is even if we concede
the argument that abortion is killing a fetus that does NOT in itself prove abortion wrong. There
are plenty of scenarios where society judges killing to be justifiable given a certain set of
circumstances. To me a woman's right to choose what to do with her body up until the fetus is born
as a baby is one of those justifiable times. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Unless you're not retarded.
A woman's choice to abort a fetus is the choice to abort a fetus. Now if I was to say a woman's
choice to abort a fetus is the choice to abort a landing on an aircraft carrier...I would be
retarded.
Bring it on rookie.
I might as well just start posting on this side. I'll be enjoying myself on this side for quite
awhile. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
No matter how you word the viewpoint of this debate, it still won’t make sense. The fact of the
matter is, according to the law, a fetus is not considered to be a “human being”, “child”,
“baby”, or any other synonym of the sort. So, technically speaking, abortion is not any form of
illegal act at all, especially not murder. To say otherwise is to create a very illogical and
unreasonable definition of “murder”. Not to mention you're completely misrepresenting the law
when you claim abortion to be murder. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Once again I say that you cannot define abortion as murder. At the time of abortion all it is, is a
termination of a group of cells, parasitic cells at that. They aren't human, living yes but not
human. If you are against these sort of cells being destroyed why aren't you against cancer cells or
dangerous bacteria being destroyed? By your logic it is a living thing and therefore has a right to
life. Destroying cancer cells is killing as well isn't it. Am I wrong? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
The status of a fetus has become a controversial issue. The subjectivity involved in such a
declaration is significantly lesser than of what we can possibly conceive as objective facts. Humans
are separate individuals by definition. The fact that fetuses reside in one’s body eliminates any
possibility which could deem them as human beings. Their emotionless characteristics, absents of
social identity, inability to be aware of their existence, lacking physical properties, and their
total dependency on a woman's body creates the consideration of them being human beings innately
ridicules. So we know that a fetus resides within a woman. We know that it has a complete absents of
social individualism; this is not debatable, the ability to have any sensation of emotion
indisputably is acquired beyond the moments of birth. A fetus is totally dependent on the body of
another, although we certainly can classify it as an entity of life, we must not forget what
constitutes a living organism. An earth worm is alive. Now let’s hypothetically give fetuses a
right to life. This right would include the use of another person’s body. How could this right
automatically claim superiority over a woman’s right to choose? If a fetus has a right to choose
their right for death should inherently be similar in significance. A child who is brought into a
world where affection and sustainability are unattainable would likely willingly cease their
existence. One with a capability of independent existence could accede to have a right to life, but
this is not the situation for a fetus. A fetuses’ continuation requires the sanction of an
individual, there blatant independency infringes on the rights of others to persist; it seems like a
parasitic circumstance. Remember equality is given at birth. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I have two children and I would never harm a hair on thier precious heads, but if I think about a
woman aborting a fetus, it just does not seem the same to me. A fetus is not a child. It is a
fetus. It doesn't matter what my personal beliefs are or whether or not I personally would abort a
pregnancy. There are children who are born and who are murdered by thier parents. Look at that
poor little Anthony child. Would it not have been better for her to have been aborted than to have
her own mother kill her in cold blood? How horrific would it be to have the person you trust most
in the world attack you and kill you? The fear and hurt must be worse than dying for those children
born to parents who hurt and/or kill them. No child should be an unwanted "thing" that stands in
the way of their parents' good times. Children should be a joy. A fetus is a fetus. I'm not cold
or mercinary. I love kids. I just see the potential for more back alley abortions that go on with
no regulations contributing to a rise in late term abortions. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
You have to define "living" before you can define "killing". |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Admit it you just hate the idea of a woman getting laid and not having to suffer some dire
consequence. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
