 |
|
|
|
| Children Should Not Get Immunized |
| There is too much danger because of higher risk of asthma, allergies, ADD and autism. Govt. Only promotes this because of Pharmaceutical interests. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We need them so we don't get sick. I hate needles but i know we need them |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Of course they should be immunised against all dangerous and infectious diseases that we can...
All of the research that "shows" that jabs are linked to autism has since been discredited by the
government and the scientific community. The initial study on the mmr jab was based on a study on
only 12 people and the jabs formulated were not the official ones used and also would never be
allowed for use anyway because of some of the chemicals in it were known to cause autism. The doctor
who formulated these results was also payed by a family a sum of £50,000 ($100, 000) to summon
evidence for their court case. The amount payed would give the scientist split motives one not being
for the advance of science.
In conclusion jabs for immunisation are perfectly safe and have been certified by the government to
be safe and they would not spend the money investing in immunisation if the effects of the diseases
were not extremely damaging. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Without immunisations many people would die at a young age. Think of other time periods - many more
people died because their immune system was not good enough to fight off some diseases. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Everyone should be immunized. That includes children. Protecting children from deadly diseases is
important, even if it can cause problems. |
| |
 Mark  30 Apr 2008 21:18
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Yes,we need to take care of our bodies. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
This is madness! Is there any scientific proof that vaccinations or immunisations cause Autism,
Asthma? No there isn't! Just a doctors report years ago that was proved wrong! People die of
diseases when their young if it wasn't for immunisation! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Immunity is required not only for children but also to adults. But some diseases are there for which
we should get our children immunized at a very infant age because certain diseases are there which
if affects the children then they may not get recovery very soon and they may had to suffer
lifelong. Though our body is built up in such a form that there remains to be a generally immunity
in it but they can not resist our body from all diseases. Also this immunity and resistance power
varies from person to person. So it is a must for any children to get immunized at a very young age.
We can see every year Government plays a vital role to make every body understand to have their
babies immunized from reliable Government clinics and hospitals. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I believe that all children should be immunized. This should be a law. If parents do not immunize
their children, then they could be subjected to a number of dangerous and deadly illnesses. If a
child does get sick because of a lack of an immunization, then this could be a form of child abuse.
Parents have the responsibility to immunize their children.
Today's world is very dirty. One can get deathly ill very easy. Even something as simple as the flu
can be deadly. If these illnesses can be prevented, why not prevent them? For me, immunizations are
a necessity for living a long, healthy life. My son has all of his immunizations updated and
therefore, I do not worry about him catching any of those dangerous and deadly diseases. I sleep
better at night knowing he is safe from these illnesses |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
All children should be immunised except mine.
There are small but definite risks for any individual who has any foreign matter injected into them.
However, there are large and definite benefits from having the whole population immunised. It
prevents the spread of diseases and saves huge costs in curing the preventable sick.
Its like washing your hands after using a public toilet. You are unlikely to come to any harm from
your own body and more likely to catch something from the taps. But everybody else is at risk from
your dirty paws, spreading germs on door knobs, eating or serving utensils, supermarket trolley
handles etc. So its safest for you if you don't to wash your hands and everybody else washes
theirs.
However this selfish attitude does not bring about the greatest good to the greatest number which
should be the aim of any civilised society.
So unfortunately compulsory immunisation for all is the only fair approach and very sorry for the
one in a million who suffers collateral damage. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
This seems to me to be totally non-sensical. Unless you have a real medical reason why you should
not be immunised, then it seems that you are simply failing to protect children from dangerous
illnesses and disease.
The fear about potential links between immunisation and other medical problems has never been firmly
proven. Instead, there is much scare mongering which convinces parents to foolishly place their
children in danger for fear of worse accidental illness.
Immunisation is about saving lives and not about pharmaceutical interests. Could they use it
unethically? Yes, of course they could. Does it seem like useless scare mongering to you? Well, it
does to me.
This type of scare mongering confuses parents and railroads them into making uninformed or should I
say misinformed choices. Without any proof, this can be playing with the lives of children.
This type of delusional nonsense causes lots of publicity and anti-pharm/chem feeling but
essentially creates hype for the nay-sayers.
As yet, there is no firm evidence for the links, no evidence that is rock solid, so until it's rock
solid, could you please keep immunising your children so that they don't end up with some dreadful
disease because trust me, if your child gets sick, it will be doctors and drugs that save them, not
empty scare mongering rhetoric. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 For and Against Recent Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sign In
