» Home » Politics
Children Ages 10-17 Should Be Allowed To Vote!
The children matter. And our future/ the future depends on us. So shouldn't we have a say so in who becomes our president??????
 dokennedy  27 Sep 2008 20:52
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
It could help the abortion issue. Republicans and Democrats could open up orphanages for voting purposes.
 
 justsumguy  29 Sep 2008 02:49
 Add a Comment
 
 
All of a sudden people turn 18 and a light goes on in their head and they say to themselves ``Holy cow, how naive I was as a teenager. I am so glad I waited to do anything dangerous until now because I can clearly comprehend the consequences of my actions and I feel like I can make well informed decision as to who should be elected to office this year.`` ...
 
 JohnShier  28 Sep 2008 10:41
 Add a Comment
 
 
They should
 
 tunainabun  27 Sep 2008 21:17
 Add a Comment
 
The fact that Obama is in office is empirical proof that the voting age needs to be risen not lowered. There are plenty of adults who vote regardless of being dangerously uninformed; allowing children to vote would merely add insult to injury.
 
 dlmiller82  06 Nov 2009 05:11
 4 Comments
 
 Perhaps it isn't a good idea to let people like you vote. But then again that would just be an act of discrimination to the mentally retarded.
by  verum
 06 Nov 2009 05:25
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Kids as young as 10 almost always support the candidate their parents support. This policy would give an unfair advantage to the candidate whose supporters had more children.

The fact of the matter is, 10-year-old just don't understand politics well enough to support a candidate for their own reasons instead of their parents'. I might support lowering the voting age as low as 15 or 14, but definitely not 10.
 
 ur_wrong  24 Oct 2008 23:54
 Add a Comment
 
 
What do they understand? The majority of them do not even care about politics. Even if they do, they do not necessarily contribute to the nation and therefore should have no direct influence upon the governmental issues.
 
 mianastra  30 Sep 2008 04:21
 Add a Comment
 
 
No, most do not have the attention span it would take to learn what the issues are...
 
 lubster  29 Sep 2008 08:48
 Add a Comment
 
 
Could you please tell me what a ten year old would want in a politician?
 
 keepmindok  29 Sep 2008 02:46
 Add a Comment
 
 
To paraphrase the war cry of the American Revolution, Representation without taxation is not fair.

Before you jump all over this, yes, I know that children pay sales taxes and yes, I know that if teenagers work than they may have to file income taxes but as a general rule, teenagers do not make enough money in a year to pay more than the base rate for taxes.

As such, children are not taxed as adults and should not be making decisions for the adults who do pay the bulk of the government's operations. If I had my way, we would go back to the original intent of the Founding Fathers and make it such that only landowners pay taxes and vote. The Founding Fathers never intended the government to require so much money that an income tax on everyone was required. And since children cannot sign contracts until they reach the age of majority, they cannot own land and should not be voting.

However, this does not mean that children's voices cannot be heard. There are lots of political actions that children can take to make themselves ready for the responsibility of voting. Get informed and get involved. Learn about what our government does. Learn the positions of your state and federal representation. Talk to your parents about the issues. Volunteer for a campaign with which you identify.
 
 achmed  28 Sep 2008 13:30
 Add a Comment
 
 
They aren't even allowed to decide when they go to bed at night. Whichever president had more myspace friends would win.
 
 Specter87  28 Sep 2008 04:33
 Add a Comment
 
 
No way! Most children don't even know anything about the candidates, and they just follow what their parents say, which may be biased. They might also fall for peer pressure and just vote for who their friends vote for.
 
 fuzzyball  28 Sep 2008 04:20
 Add a Comment
 
 
What silliness
 
 Cons_Lies  28 Sep 2008 02:24
 Add a Comment
 
 
Froggy is just below the standard age to vote and she's still scared about it. It requires a choice and good political knowledge, one does not vote on someone because their shoes look cool.

Sadly, Froggy knows that's how a lot of teenagers are. The age between 10-17 is a time where they focus on peer pressure, and if all their friends were doing it they'd vote for the one with the best hair. Froggy has a few friends like that.
Another thing, Froggy is just learning the true meaning between democratic, republican, and independent. Who expects a ten year old to know that?

Certainly there are some well informed and intelligent children out there but the majority of them are just kids who would rather vote for their class rep. Froggy knows that she'd much rather keep it that way too.

Sure children are the future, Froggy understands that and uses it as an excuse quite often. However Froggy does understand that the choices of intelligent adults with experiance in a voters consequences would know what to do. When an 18 year old starts to vote it'll put the slightest strain that'll make them wonder if they're making the right choice. The only way to make the right choice is to follow the elections.
Has anyone seen a 10 or 11 year old willingly watch the debates and speechs?

Froggy says to look at modern day teens and what their interests are, it's not politics. So Froggy believes they should be left out of voting until they reach 18.
 
 froggy101  28 Sep 2008 02:09
 Add a Comment
 
 
Even emancipated teens should wait. 18 is a perfect standard. Even to consume alcohol.
 
 AMERICAN1  28 Sep 2008 00:01
 Add a Comment
 
 
Absolutely not. Children do not understand what is going on. They just mirror what their parents and teachers say. Would you allow a ten year old to treat your physical ailments, I think not. I would never entrust the well being of our Country to the hands of children.
 
 pusspuss  27 Sep 2008 22:10
 Add a Comment
 
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
An 'idiot' Does Not Shake Up Washington.
It's Okay For Barack Obama To Be President. He's Not Really A "black" Anyway.
A Lot Of Clinton Supporters Are Just Plain Old Racists
Jesse Ventura Would Make A Good President
Those Three Democrats Who Changed Their Vote On The 'Bail-Out' Plan Once The Saw It Would Not Pass Should...
Any Political Organization Will Instinctually And Inherently Seek To Gain Or Increase Their Power And...
There Are Enough Liberals With Enough Money To Solve Poverty.
We Wouldn't Have Half The Problems We Do If There Weren't So Many Females In Politics.
Obama Shouldn't Pick Up Hillary's Tab
C-SPAN Is The Best Place For Politics
New Debates
We All Have A Fictional Character Which We Secretly Want To Be.
Race Is An Outmoded And Increasingly Ineffective Classification System For The Human Race
Taylor Swifts You Belong With Me Song/video Is Really Good, Happy, Feelgood, Cheesy, Uplifting Song!
This Really Is A Very Good, Very Interesting, Knowledegable Site.
We Need More Meats On Sticks
People Who Do Not Vote For President Should Not Be Able To Critcize Him/ Her
You Should Stop Beating Your Wife
The American Love Affair With Guns Is Britain’s Fault.
People On This Site Seem Too Serious And Don't Seem To Know How To Just Act Assinine. Debate The Rediculous....
An Hung Parliament Would Be A Disaster For Britain.