|
|
 |
|
The first "chickens" had to be born as mutations from a slightly different beast that came before
it. The egg mutated and a chicken came out of it. So the egg came first.
To say the chicken came first would mean somehow a hatched animal started as something else and then
mutated while adult to become the first chicken, and mutations later in life are almost aways fatal
so it's highly unlikely it happened that way. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It takes a chicken to make an egg an egg to make a chicken and a numpty to ask the question. The
chicken might wonder where the egg came from, granting chickens with the power of thought, but the
egg wouldn't know, think or care. Do we produce more chickens or eggs? We produce eggs to make
chickens and chickens to make eggs. It's an endless cycle of madness I tell ya. The egg came first,
Christ knows where it came from, but without it, there would be no chickens, and then where would
the farming industry be? All sheep n cows. The ducks are left out here, and the gooses, the chickens
steal all the light, that's the big question. Why do we believe the world revolves around chickens?
Because without the chickens there would be no eggs. My God, I tripped over the abyss with that one.
I'm gonna shut all my curtains and moonwalk naked round my house now. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Like every other comment below, evolution takes place through reproduction, a dinosaur does not
shrink, its baby is born smaller and/ or with feathers... |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Something that was almost but not quite a chicken laid an egg with enough of a genetic shift to
qualify it as a chicken egg. Therefore the egg came before the chicken. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Well thinking on terms of evolution the egg had to have come first. For a creature to evolve it has
to give off offspring that is unless "original" chickens didn't lay eggs and had life birth, highly
unlikely considering that they evolved from fish which layed eggs. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I think primordial ooze came way before either. That debate has no answer. It's a dead end. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Chickens evolved slowly over time making the question meaningless, unless you don't accept evolution
that is in which case it would be the chicken since god supposedly created all the animals at 'the
beginning'. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I'm against it! |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
13 Jul 2008 20:01
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
