» Home » Politics
"Change We Can Believe In" Is A Pathetic Phrase.
I like Obama since he seems to be a cool guy, though I don't know him. The point is that I don't like his phrase. It's not only cheesy- it's too broad. Virtually any politician could use it and it would fit...except Bush.
 Stranger  30 May 2008 19:58
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
It is just an empty phrase such as much of the campaign promises most politicians indulge in and fail to follow-through on when elected into office....
Obama is just another politician....why the surprise?
Politics is a dirty business and not known for honesty and integrity expressed in deeds.
He is no better nor any worse than the others though.
 
 AssetParis  03 Mar 2009 03:03
 Add a Comment
 
 
NObama needs to get a new phrase. Especially now that he has Biden.

Cheny is to Bush as Biden is to NObama

same old rhetoric from the dems.
 
 created  20 Sep 2008 04:36
 Add a Comment
 
 
I'm afraid to find out which direction of change this wonderful country would take if someone who sat under an antiamerican preacher for 20 yrs and his wife is just now proud to be an American. ???? I'm very proud to live in the greatest country in the world no matter what happens.
 
 codeman  31 May 2008 00:41
 1 Comment
 
 If I was an American, I'd be ashamed of what my country had become. However, its obvious now everyone has to appear ultra-patriotic or else incur the disdain of the masses. So what if she was once not proud to be American? No suprise, to be honest.
by  Carl
 01 Jun 2008 13:17
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
In my state we just had an election for governor with a candidate very similar to Obama, in fact they are very good friends. This guy's phrase was "YES WE CAN!" He never really said yes we can what...but he and his hordes of people would mindlessly chant "YES WE CAN!". He never made any specific plans or even promises other than there would be change.

He was elected in a landslide, and has been at the job for about a year. There is no change at all. Nothing has changed except he wants casinos (i never really understood how casinos are a liberal core value).

In the end we have an empty suit doing nothing, and his approval rating is in the dumps. It will be 4 years of nothingness.
 
 innomen  31 May 2008 00:03
 6 Comments
 
 That's not what will happen if a racist gets into office Inn... He'll want us all to pay reparations, probably have Jesse Jackson in there (the great EXTORTIONER) and who knows what, maybe the 40 acres and a mule... ha ha
by  stever
 31 May 2008 01:08
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Change... In our democracy? Our government may be corrupt, but it is by far one of the best in the world.

Obama is not fit to run in my opinion. He has very little experience, and this is very evident. When a supporter of Mr. Obama was asked about his accomplishments in the 'O Reilly Factor, he went blank... And as follows:

Supporter (Texas, D): "Uh, well, see, I really don't think that that matter, because he is a great guy-"
O'Reilly: "Of course it matters!"
Supporter: " Um... You see, well, I cannot name any, but he has the potential."

- foxnews.com

Another thing is he gets stumped frequently by questions, as he is not familiar with a large amount of the issues, as demonstrated in this recording:
Http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N7gYufs2A1A
 
 XieXie  30 May 2008 21:46
 3 Comments
 
 Fox news is also pathetic. I think that the midwest is quite Republican. We are affected by our environment.

And...I'm a bit pathetic for using the word so much.
by  Stranger
 30 May 2008 22:41
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I agree cuz on one of his interviews this is what happened:
Obama: I want to bring change!
Reporter: What kind of change?
Obama: Change!
 
 celva_olva  30 May 2008 21:20
 2 Comments
 
 Really? And what followed? Did the reporter fail to say "you did not specify"?
by  Stranger
 30 May 2008 21:29
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Obama's entire campaign has been mawkish and cheesy, including the elusive "change" mantra, Oprah's inspirational messages, the mesmerized, chanting followers and the truly absurd belief that this Democratic candidate can be everything to everyone, and unite people of all ideological backgrounds.

The sort of adoration that people openly demonstrated for Obama and the complete lack of critical thinking skills shown by journalists and pundits who looked on in awe is more becoming of a pseudo-democratic, underdeveloped country, like Belarus or Uzbekistan. One would assume that a country like the US, which has a tradition of democracy, would shy away from personality cults, yet this is precisely what has been built up around Obama. Barack's "bitter" remarks and his pastor's crazed sermons may have frightened off some independent and undecided voters from supporting him, but all of this did little to dampen the inexplicable and cultish enthusiasm felt by his supporters.
 
 mackenzie  30 May 2008 20:38
 6 Comments
 
 Don't write off the US quite yet, there is also a huge conservative following in the US. And conservatives tend to be more educated and less gullible. Your just not seeing them during the primaries.
by  stever
 30 May 2008 20:44
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
They all do it. Somewhere back in time it came to be...the US population does not want details, it wants broad statements like that. I guess it reminds them of being in a sports arena, I don't know.
 
 momof3  30 May 2008 20:19
 Add a Comment
 
 
Not to mention, that when Obama uses it, he makes it out as the only way to have change is to vote for him.......... Or you're a racist.
 
 stever  30 May 2008 20:07
 Add a Comment
 
It's not a very resonant phrase, for sure, but it makes a serious point. Change is obviously in the air after the disastrous Bush years so all candidates are marketing themselves as the candidates for change. Yet Hillary and McCain ape Bush in many of their policy positions, including in those areas where Bush's performance might be judged worst of all : The foreign policy sphere, and the practice of demagogic fear-mongering, hyping up irrational and unjustified fears about foreign threats and allowing those fears to shape many aspects of government policy.
 
 Hidell  31 May 2008 02:54
 Add a Comment
 
 
Actually, he's not using it any more because Hillary started using it too. But the thing is, Obama means it. All politicians use slogans and this is far far better than "Just say no", "Tippecanoe and Tyler too", or "43 58 or bust!".
 
 OzzieMan  30 May 2008 21:31
 1 Comment
 
 Comparing bad to worse.
by  Stranger
 30 May 2008 22:39
Comment
  
Comment
  
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Women Could Take Over The Government In The US If They Really Wanted To
No 'Bail Out'- We Pay, 'Bail Out'- Our Kids Pay. I Say No Bailout.
MSNBC Is Biased Against Hillery Clinton
It Is Time To Close Loop Holes And Make The Rich Pay Their Fair Share In Tax.
Obama Is Better Than Clinton
Just As The Banks And Supermarkets, Will Be, It's Time For The BBC To Be Broken Up.
War, In General, Is Necessary And Important
The Godbot Got Herself Killed
Sarah Palin Won't Make A Good V.P.
The Best President American's Could Have Is....Themselves.
New Debates
Is Hydrogen Poroxide A Good Ingredien For Experiments Like Elephant Toothpaste.
MacDonalds Should Be Banned
Porche 911 Turbo Is A Noticable Car On The Streets.
If You Meet An Alien It Will Suck Out Your Brains.
Chicken Is Nice
That My Brother Doesn't Have A Dick
That Modern Technology Is A Plague On Human Relationships
Technology Is Tearing Us A Criminal
Technology Is Tearing Us A Part
Diet Coke And Mentos Is One Of The Best Experiments.