This being made "debate of the day" is proof that designation is not made by any objective critria. This topic has neither the volume of responses compared to the other recent topics nor the value to justify placing it above all others.
It also hints the site owner who holds all the power is probably behind joker avatars like proby96.
It's ridiculous that people like you come to intellectual sites like these simply to troll. Just
because you haven't seen something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. It might simply be a probability
to you, but that doesn't make it any less real. It is rationally more likely for it to exist then
not exist, therefore it can't have the credence of a myth.