» Home » Miscellaneous
Bystanders Of A Crime Should Be Prosecuted.
I think they should because they were there when the crime happened. They could have done something. For example, one child was abused by her parents and died. Neighbours had been there numerous times when the child was physically abused but they did not say anything or report to anyone.
 ayudel  09 Jun 2010 03:05
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
I agree with the idea, but I think it would be very difficult to prove a bystander guilty in many circumstances.
 
 proby96  06 Dec 2010 20:24
 Add a Comment
 
They dint do anything agansit the ten commants or our laws.
 
 trexfire  21 Mar 2012 19:57
 Add a Comment
 
 
So you want to require people to intervene or face jail, talk about the government controlling our lives.
 
 shogduke  11 Jun 2010 03:27
 Add a Comment
 
 
I disagree, it just sounds unfair.
 
 Balance_92  10 Jun 2010 12:31
 Add a Comment
 
 
But why should people who haven't committed a crime be prosecuted? That isn't justice.
And what about if the bystander did something, it would put them or their family at risk? It's not fair for the to be prosecuted because they wouldn't help someone else.
Also, when it comes to crimes such as drug dealing, many people are simply too scared to report or do anything about it as many of the criminals are known to be violent. Even when in prison, they can have connections.
 
 MaYbCaKe  10 Jun 2010 12:11
 Add a Comment
 
 
In France it is the law - you can be prosecuted for not interfering
 
 damselfly  09 Jun 2010 14:03
 1 Comment
 
 I find this very interesting. Thanks for the information. ;)
by  ayudel
 10 Jun 2010 05:25
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
It is a very interesting assertion. I don't think prosecution is in order. However, in the example you sighted, in the medical field, if child abuse is suspected, it is a crime not to report it.
The most important aspect of your statement is the fact of how robust our moral thoughts and sensibilities really are. Many moral minimalist will argue that any action is OK as long as what you are doing doesn't hurt another. Here you are arguing that even by NOT doing something you are making an immoral act and should even be prosecuted for NOT acting. Even though I agree with the basic moral rightness of your thinking, I still do not believe one should be prosecuted for not acting, but am a bit on the fence, because of so many other examples of where NONaction is so very immoral. Such as standing by and watching a one year old crawl into the middle of a busy freeway and just standing by and doing nothing, etc.
 
 charlee  09 Jun 2010 13:43
 Add a Comment
 
 
I agree we have a moral responsibility to each other. I agree we should help each other in times of need, that's why I believe in Foreign Aid, and UN Peacekeepers, and charities. But this takes that moral responsibility and turns it into a crushing legal duty which I believe is way too far. The Neighbours did not have a legal duty of care to that child, and while they were perhaps morally obligated to help it, saying they should be prosecuted for not doing so is ridiculous since their duty of care falls far short of it.

Besides, how do you define bystander? Are you going to prosecute everyone who sees an armed robbery and doesn't step into the fray? Police advise people to avoid intervening in violent crime because of the vast risks. Just what level of risk are we now required to take on under your system?

EDIT: Also, your system de-heroises people. I like honouring those who put themselves at risk to help others. By making it a legal requirement you are suggesting their actions required no bravery and everyone not only should but will do it in the future.
 
 Quincel  09 Jun 2010 09:43
 2 Comments
 
 Well said.
by  Grenache
 09 Jun 2010 09:55
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
No Because they havn'y done anything wrong
 
 Drakus  09 Jun 2010 08:18
 1 Comment
 
 You have syphilis.
by  proby96
 06 Dec 2010 18:06
Comment
  
Comment
  
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
People Who Are Losing An Argument, Most Regularly Will Attack You Personally
Negroes Have Been Manipulated For 60 Years
Typing "ha, Ha, Ha" Or "tee, Hee Hee" Instead Of Putting The Conventional "lol" Feels Stupidish.
Background Checks For Gun Purchases Are A Waste Of Time
I Own And Recommend The Hornady Progressive Press With Case Feeder
This New "god" Debater Should Be Kicked Off Forandagainst.com
If You See The Ocean Suddenly Recede, You Should Run Away.
The Most Judgemental People Are Those Who Believe In God And Attend Church
Anger Is Negatively Addictive.
Animals Should Not Be Killed For Fun
New Debates
Get A Safe Drive With Driver On Hire Services In Pune.
Which Is The Best Company To Hire Private Driver In Pune?
Find A Dentist & Book An Appointment In Kalyan | Dentee
The Best Fissure Surgeon In Mumbai | ClinTech
Find Best Treatment For Guttate Psoriasis
High Voltage Divider By Udeyraj Electricals Private Limited
Top Executive Search Firms In India | Prompt Personnel
Get Rid Of Gynecomastia At Gynecomastia Cure
Atma - An Accelerator For Education NGOs In Mumbai, India
The Importance Of Landlord Insurance