|
I like Burger King better the King could so kick their silly oversized talking vegatables asses! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I actually rather link BurgerKing. The Whopper, or Jr. Whopper, is an amazing deal for 99c. Can't
beat that with a $5 footlong. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Subways sandwiches actually have more saturated fats in them than a macdonalds meal. It's a true
fact. And if you ask me all of subways sandwiches taste the same. And it costs 1 pound extra to have
your sandwich toatsed now...if you want a hot meal go to burger king instead of paying stupid money
for a sandwich that you could make at home just as well as subway do. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Normally I would say that this comparison isn't valid since you're comparing apples to oranges, and
that you can't really compare burgers to sub sandwiches because either could be best depending on
what you're in the mood for. However, I've never been a fan of Burger King's char-broiled meat - I
like fried meat so much better. So I'll have to disagree and say that Subway is better.
99 cent Whopper Jr... It wasn't that long ago when the full-sized Whoppers were 99 cents. Inflation
sucks. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It depends on which menu items you compare, but in general I consider subway both tastier and
healthier.
Also I'm sick of seeing the cheesey King commercials with the guy in the mask doing creepy things
whether homoerotic or rapping about square butts. At least with subway you only have either
standard commercials or at worst a Jerrod weight loss reference. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
BK is full of shiz in their food. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No it ain't |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No it is not subway tastes better and is better for you |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
How can one possibly compare a sandwich shop to a burger joint? Personally, though, I'd rather eat
at Subway than at Burger King. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Subway owns BK any day. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
21 Apr 2009 00:00
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
