» Home » Society
British Citizens Should Be Lawfully Allowed To Carry Blades.
For self protection
 muin13  12 Mar 2008 23:53
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
You might as well forget about British citizens being able to carry anything in their own defense. You are politically correct government will not allow it. Law abiding citizens want to protect themselves from the growing criminal threat in the UK, but it will not happen. Have fun mate. Hope you are enjoying the constant change in your country towards the worst. It is happening in America too. You are not alone.
 
 athling  17 Aug 2008 16:06
 1 Comment
 
 I'm going back to France, the worst thing about France is its full of French people.lol
by  muin13
 18 Aug 2008 01:04
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Any legislation to arbitrarily ban a weapon because a few use it improperly only punishes those who have neither the means nor the motivation to use said weapon in a malicious way. Plenty of people from all walks of life in many different countries carry or own weapons. If more weapons = more crime, there would be anarchy worldwide right? Why isn't there? Because most people ARE responsible, and follow that general rule of thumb when you own a weapon, which is, don't even take it out unless you absolutely need to. People who commit crimes with knives or guns care not how many laws and rules you pass against their tools, they get them anyway, usually from illegal sources which negates any subsequent laws you might pass.
 
 cstrand31  21 Apr 2008 07:36
 Add a Comment
 
 
I agree. The right to self-defense is the most basic of all human rights. Everyone should be allowed to carry weapons, whether it be knives or guns.

It's utterly wrong that the mere carrying of a weapon should be criminalities. Crimes should have victims. Where exactly is the victim in the supposed crime of carrying a knife? There is none. If the knife is used improperly, of course that is a crime in itself and should be punished.

A system of retributive justice does nothing for the person who is mugged by four people. Carrying a weapon would have given the victim at least a chance at self-defense.
 
 Hidell  13 Mar 2008 01:27
 4 Comments
 
 the one who gets stabbed is the victim. We are having a bit of a knife culture going on here, kids are carrying knives and stabbing has increased it's pretty easy to see why. Plainly if they didn't have a knife there would be no stabbing.
by  StBalders
 13 Mar 2008 01:35
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
This is a crazy ass debate but i agree. Lol.
 
 nelson12  13 Mar 2008 00:03
 Add a Comment
 
That would definitely raise the crime rate, you can't fight blade with a blade anyway, both people would get injured or killed. I doubt there are many people in the world responsible enough to carry a knife, let alone in Britain, where the majority of youth lack morals.
If you want to protect yourself, don't get involved in gangs or become a chav, or making your mouth go.
I would not feel safe in society any longer knowing everyone I see is carrying a blade, especially when their are drunks or drug abusers on the streets, and even mentally ill people can misuse weapons. The mere thought of everyone carrying a blade is barbaric.
 
 MaYbCaKe  03 Nov 2008 18:28
 Add a Comment
 
 
Whoever wrote this is seriously lacking in grey cells! For self-protection, do you know why many stabbings happen? Because stupid people are carrying knifes for protection! Most places especially London are unsafe walk because of that idea.
 
 Balance_92  17 Aug 2008 15:49
 Add a Comment
 
 
I don't think so. In fact it would raise the crime rate. Along with this, people would feel insecure knowing that some of them are carrying some sort of weapons.

I think there should be betterment in law and order rather than giving people a chance to have shot at the criminals themselves.
 
 haroon4u  21 Apr 2008 05:57
 Add a Comment
 
 
Just like with guns, if you want more knives around expect more knife-related crime.
 
 Shizenk  15 Mar 2008 21:21
 Add a Comment
 
 
There is absolutely no conclusive evidence to suggest that countries or other jurisdictions that allow citizens to carry weapons for self-defence have lower crime rates than those states that prohibit this practice. In fact, the number of violent crimes throughout much of the United States remains higher than in most European countries, despite the fact that gun ownership is fairly common.

I would not feel safe knowing that people I bump into on the street or on public transport have guns and knives on their person. Alcoholism, drug use and, in fact, the stresses of every day life cloud judgement and even law-abiding citizens may once make a poor decision--out of circumstances partly beyond their control--and may decide to use their weapon.

We live in a civil society. Yes, there are unfortunately crimes, but by choosing to live in a democracy, we agree to give up certain rights (such as carrying weapons) in the understanding that public authorities will offer us protection. In the vast majority of cases, this system functions quite well.
 
 mackenzie  14 Mar 2008 11:31
 1 Comment
 
 Really? Can you cite one instance where RESPONSIBLE gun or knife owners created more crime? because that's really the only people that weapon legislation applies to, law abiding citizens. KENNESAW, Ga passed a law requiring that a firearm be kept in every household. guess what? crime actually went down. the mere fact that any one of the houses in the town at any moment might be in possession of a weapon was enough of a deterrent for criminals. weapons are an equalizer, if a criminal thinks you aren't armed he has the advantage. conversely if you are armed and the criminals know that people take full advantage of their right to protect themselves, you are less likely to be threatened or worse assaulted with a weapon.
by  cstrand31
 21 Apr 2008 07:47
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Protection from what? Another idiot with a knife?
No way, StBalders is right.
 
 Jahwobble  13 Mar 2008 18:51
 Add a Comment
 
 
Not a chance. The only outcome of that would be that they are used more often.
 
 StBalders  13 Mar 2008 00:11
 Add a Comment
 
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
People Should Not Stay In Hotels
It's A Man's World
Most (out Of Order) Chavs Should Be Sent To Special Schools.
There Are Not Enough Religions In The World To Go Around
Openly Biased Newspapers Are Better Than Those Which Aspire To Political Objectivity
American Students Are Less Intelligent Than Others From Different Countries Around The World
Political Correctness Has Gone Too Far!
More Money Is Needed For Space Exploration
Children (-18) Only Disrespect "adults" Who Disrespect Them
People Should Get Over It When Someone Comments On Their Debate
New Debates
How Many Of You Would Actually Fight For Our Country If You Had The Chance?
What Is Pain?
One Of The Best Things You Can Do For Yourself And Loved Ones Is To Set Goals For The Coming Year. Studies...
Apocalypse, 2012, IMMINENT
Life Isn't About What Happens To You It's How "you Choose To React To What Happens.
Life's Worst Experiences Can Teach You The Most About Life.
World Government Is Inevitable.
All Dogs Should Be Allowed In Stores
A Great Documentary On The Subject Of Horror And The Topic Of Censorship Is "Celluloid Horror".
Porn Industry Now Asking For A Bailout!