 |
|
|
|
| Blasphemy Should Still Be An Offence, Even On A Web-site Like This! |
| I think blasphemy is the offence of speaking or written matter relating to ''God, Jesus Christ, the Bible, or the Book of Common Prayer,'' intended to wound the feelings of humankind or excite contempt and hatred against the church by law established, or to promote immorality. There is far too much of it on this site! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The blasphemy law protects God's people from the nasty vindictive wounds of poor lost souls intent
on inflicting their vicious, wicked deceitful cruel tongues on the high moral standards practiced by
all who adhere to God's good graces. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Obviously all those voting on the Against side are scheming, two-faced, right-wing, egotistical,
self-preserving, blasphemous Machiavellian, intransigent, deceitful, hypocritical, debaters, with a
blatant sheer disregard for the law. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Absolutely. It would make me very sad to think I wasn't offending anyone with my blasphemy. I put a
lot of work into it. I deserve my satisfaction. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
READ CAREFULLY: By definition blasphemy absolutely is an offence. The act of disagereeing with God
and religion is in fact blasphemy or heresy or whatever you want to call it. BUT, being an offence
is NOT the same thing as being illegal or being censorable. Lots of blasphemy is committed on this
site. NONE of that blasphemy warrants being censored. It's a debate site, if you don't want a fair
and open debate then don't play in this sandbox. Go have your religious debate in a religious chat
room instead.
But yes, blasphemy is an offence, users on this site who are offended have every right to say they
are offended, and indeed some of the blasphemy is committed maliciously and with extreme bias
against all things and people religious. They have a right to say those things, you have a right to
express your offence by it. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It is a offence against a God, and the Holy Father, the a Pope, too! It is a crime, where is a
justice in this a world? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
They use to stone them in my day, now they want to change the law so they can get stoned. There has
been a huge moral decline since these wastrels have been allowed to run riot with their evil viper
tongues! Prosecute them I say, they are guilty as charged! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
There are many blasphemous debaters on this site, ALL ARE EXTREMELY GUILTY OF EXPRESSING BLASPHEMY! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
There is far too much evil being portrayed on this site, with an impious purpose to derogate from
the divine majesty, and to alienate the minds of others from the love and reverence of ''God.''
There are far too many debaters purposely using words concerning ''God,'' calculated and designed to
impair and destroy the reverence, respect, and confidence due to ''Him,'' as the intelligent
creator, governor, and judge of the world. These debaters in their willful and malicious attempt to
lessen the human reverence of ''God,'' by denying ''His'' existence, or ''His'' attributes as an
intelligent creator, governor, and judge of all, in such a way as to prevent human kind having
confidence in ''God,'' as such, is willful blasphemy. Blasphemy statutes still exist in many states,
and should be enforced to prevent the moral decline in the USA, and the UK, and other countries,
too! |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
There is one main flaw with this ever becoming law. There are ppl who do not believe in God and
those ppl are not committing blasphemy as they do not believe there is anyone to blaspheme. As for
ppl promoting immorality who decides what is immoral for one persons idea on the subject do not
agree with all ppl. Lastly if there was a law to protect you from hearing what you consider
blasphemy then a law would also have to be passed for those who do not believe in God so that you
can't talk about God because it would be blasphemy to those who do not believe. So if you want a law
banning blasphemy you would lose the right to talk about God at all. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I am afraid no one has the right to never be offended. For Christ's sake. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
What you need to realise is that not everyone believes in christianity :S |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Blasphemy should be a requirement. Then at least if you have cursed God, you have the right to
pontificate about His existence. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I might be wrong, but I'm reading this as a suggestion to ban blasphemy. Free Speech anyone? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Fine, but blasphemy also applies to every other supposed god out there, therefore every church on
the planet, in putting one god above another, is guilty of blasphemy.
Let's close all the churches and outlaw religion. Oh wait, that's blasphemy too! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Is this a Christian site? I'm just askin'. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I think it is a free speech issue--we don't want government controlling our thoughts. I'm sure the
same folks who want to protect free speech and adamantly opposed to censorship of the right to
blasphemy would also be strong supporters of one's right to speak in condemnation of homosexuality
or abortion or any other moral issue. I would hate to think that the devout adherents of free
speech (myself included) would tolerate such a double standard. Or is "hate speech" reserved only
for censorship of the moral issues that are dear to them? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I enjoy destroying God's power with my little finger. He is a weak, stupid leader. What are you
going to do now? What is your "plan" for dealing with me? You don't have one short of killing me,
way to go, another token from the religious masses |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
The church has so much contempt and hatred for everyone else, yet they expect everyone to adhere to
their codes and traditions. It's truly naive.
Satan says hi. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Who, then will be the blaspheme police? What if the blaspheme police agree with something that is
said which could be construed as blasphemy by some dirt worshipping heathen? How's this for a
concept...before you make ridiculous questions....think it through to its logical conclusion,, have
a suggestion available for practical implementation.....and work forward from that point. Obviously,
as you are blinded by your own beleif system to even an infantile system of logic.....we find
ourselves here |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Religions falsely claim that their "gods" are sooooo great that they can create the Earth and an
entire universe, yet their "gods" are so emotionally insecure that making jokes about them threatens
their existence?
No. It's the religious who are insecure because their fairy tales are being challenged, not their
"gods". Blasphemy is a victimless crime because there are no "gods" to be offended. There
are no "gods", period.
Edit:
Even if there were "gods" (which there aren't), that such "gods" are more
egotistical and childish than a five year old should tell you something. If a "god" is all-knowing
and all-seeing, then should have a maturity level that surpasses any human, yet the mythical "god"
displays the most juvenile of behaviours.
Also, and of course, Slag avoided the key issue of there being no "gods" proven to exist while
falsely claiming I'm avoiding the issue. And I though christians/muslims/jews weren't allowed to
"bear false witness" as the old testicles says. |
| |
 K9  11 Nov 2009 20:25
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Of course it shouldn't be an offence, it's absolutely ridiculous to suggest such a thing. We live in
a democracy and to suppress this kind of free speech is undemocratic and dangerous. And plus why
should people who don't believe in god be punished, they don't believe in your bible or your god
person in the sky so why should the law punish them. This would be kind of like punishing people who
don't believe, I'm sure the Catholic Church would just love that. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Anyone who thinks blasphemy should be an offence doesn't deserve to live in a democracy. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Christianity tends to kill people that don't agree. What you see as blasphemy is not in the eyes of
non-christians. Law should be formulated to protect human rights like the freedom of speech and just
because you don't like something doesn't give you the right to legislate against it |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 For and Against Recent Activity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sign In
