» Home » Cars & Transport
Bicyclists Should Not Ride On Two Lane Roads (without Shoulders) During Rush Hour.
This is simply stupid. It is a death wish to ride on a shoulder-less two lane road during peak traffic times.
 vexed  21 Feb 2008 18:16
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
I agree. It is very difficult to cycle with out shoulders as your arms are not attached and you have little control over the steering of the vehicle.
 
 Leo110  20 Oct 2011 08:40
 1 Comment
 
 Unicyclists shouldn't be allowed either, even though there are no handle bars, what if they fall off? If they have no shoulders (or therefore arms) they could become severely damaged, I mean would the tax-payer had to fund the repair of this person?
by  Leo110
 20 Oct 2011 08:42
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Yeah its a really bad idea because it just worsenes the congestion because people have to slow down and sometimes also have to change lane.
 
 calum-r  17 May 2008 12:08
 Add a Comment
 
 
Of course, if the lane widths are too narrow and the speed limit too high for it to be considered safe for cyclists, they should be directed off the carriageway.

But, if possible, off road cycle routes should be provided where cyclists are restricted from cycling on the carriageway.
 
 JRCBailey  26 Feb 2008 22:00
 Add a Comment
 
 
Yes. They are in extreme danger.
 
 green15  21 Feb 2008 19:10
 Add a Comment
 
I'm a cyclist and i will use the road still. Its law for drivers to give way to cyclists.
 
 clarkdavid  03 Apr 2009 12:29
 2 Comments
 
 Unfortunately, most drivers are too stupid to understand that cars are not more important than people.
by  K9
 23 May 2009 13:04
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I am a cyclist, and try to avoid riding at those times, but there is no reason I should. I have the right to ride wherever the law allows, and cars are too greedy of the road. I can't tell you how many fat people in cars get so angry when a bike is near them. It just aggravates me, if we want to ride our bikes there is nothing stopping us.
 
 dtv3000  11 Jun 2008 22:00
 Add a Comment
 
 
Wrong. The problem is too many cars, not how fast they go.

The righthand lane should be closed to cars and used only by cyclists and scooters Let the cars suffer with gridlock in a single lane.

 
 K9  20 Apr 2008 18:50
 Add a Comment
 
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Holden Beats Ford
I Wanna Be A Top Debater (:
1967 GT 500 Is Faster And Way Cooler Than An 2009 Mustang
Are You For Tailgating Or Against It
Why Should Public Transport Fees Go Up?
It Is Better To Back In Than To Pull In When Parking A Car.
Should Leftovers Be Given To Charity?
We Should Make A Cars That Run On Water
No Car Insurance Or Illegal Aliens , Car Insurance Should Concern Us More
Being A Vegetarian Is Not Good For Your Heath.
New Debates
CPAC Scrambles To Control Damage After Attendees Wave Russian Flags During Trump Speech
"Priebus Request To FBI Violated Norms, If Not Rules".
Mr. Trump Continues His Attacks On His Own Government’s Law Enforcement And Intelligence Agencies....
Fairies Don't Exist.
Abortion Procedures Are Messed-Up.
Wikileaks Is Morally "Wrong".
Bitcoin Is The Future Of Money.
Through A Modern Perspective Satan Isn't That Bad.
It's Okay To Wear Sneakers Without Socks.
McCain: Trump’s Attacks On Press Are 'how Dictators Get Started'.