|
I do believe the media is biased, but not universally in the same direction. Every media outlet has
it's own little spin. It depends what your watching, reading, or listening to.
I don't know much about this political situation, sorry. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Yes the media is biased. So biased in fact that whatever bias you want can be found with little
effort. As for everything you said besides the debate title, well, you should try not to be so
biased. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
I disagree on a technicality - Bias media is reasonable, expected, and encouraged. I want my media
to express their bias. This will bring more truth to the process.
I believe your actual beef is with Media that claims to be impartial when they in fact express their
bias in subtle and not-so-subtle ways.
Case in point - Rush Limbaugh is clearly bias and he tells you so. Dan Rather was bias but he
claimed to be impartial. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Palin is much more qualified than Obama is - to run a sweet shop. That this clueless sow is taken
seriously as a candidate for the most important job in the world, and not just laughed off the
stage, is a standing indictment of the quality of American democracy. It's the blind leading the
blind, dumb and dumber. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
You are yet another in a long line if idiot FUX News watchers who doesn't have a clue as to what
real news is nor a spine to sign up or shut up about your war.
Charlie Gibson of ABCDisney? "Left wing"? He threw more softballs at Palin than George Putz
usually gets, and she couldn't handle them. And Gibson deliberately avoided any mention or hard
questions about creationism in schools, the bridge to nowhere and the rampant corruption in the
Alaska RePubicHair party. |
| |
 K9  13 Sep 2008 20:30
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
