» Home » Sports
Athletic Competitions Should Be Discontinued
Athletics is a joke now. We all know that the athletes are junkies, using drugs and chemicals to boost their performances. How many high profile medal winners have been exposed in the last few years? And it's not just a minority, or even a majority of athletes who do this. They all do it. All use drugs or chemicals to enhance their performances. Some use substances which are banned; some use substances which haven't been banned yet. Who cares about who the best drug-user is? Athletic sport has been utterly ruined and should now be discontinued.
 Hidell  25 Mar 2008 14:48
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
It's not just the rigged competition, it's the environmental and economic waste. Think of how many times pro sports teams fly, at least forty trips per year, or the costs of moving vast amounts of equipment and people around the world. How about massive expenses in technology for microscopic gains (e.g. F1 cars cost $50m or more and can run a lap 4% faster than Champ Cars that cost $1m). Even sports that look "environmentally friendly" like cycling and skiing use exorbitant amounts of resources and cause excessive amounts of pollution and waste.
 
 K9  26 Apr 2008 08:45
 Add a Comment
 
 
There have been so many high profile gold-medal winning athletes exposed as illegal drug users now that I feel the spectacle of athletics competition has been utterly devalued. When we watch the Olympics this summer, speculating about which athlete is a junkie will provide just as much entertainment value as watching the events themselves.

New performance-enhancing substances are constantly being synthesized in laboratories. The regulatory authorities cannot keep up. Athletes use some of the newly innovated drugs, get away with it for a few years and then are exposed further down the line. People like Florence Griffiths-Joyner and Marion Jones were strongly suspected at the peak of their fame of being drug abusers, yet they continued to reap the glory and the cash that came with it for a long time.

It's better, in my opinion, that athletics competition should simply be brought to an end. It has become so pervasively corrupt that is no longer salvageable. The only real alternative is to legalise the use of performance-enhancing substances. At least that way we would know that everyone is competing on even terms. Many of these substances have unfortunate side-effects on health, though, so it's not a very good example to set for young people.
 
 Hidell  27 Mar 2008 03:07
 Add a Comment
 
Sports are good for people. If the pros choose to use drugs that's their problem, not the sport itself.
 
 ur_wrong  25 Aug 2008 01:46
 Add a Comment
 
 
It is one of the most ancient competitions still running in modern society and i think that that is a very broad accusation you made that isn't true, not all athletes are users and the majority of them work very hard to get to where they are!!
 
 F18Aviator  02 Apr 2008 14:38
 Add a Comment
 
 
Oh my god, "Athletic Competitions Should Be Discontinued" Are you kidding me every Athletic is very competitive in every way. That's one of the main reason a Athletic becomes and Athletic.
 
 Okay  27 Mar 2008 02:12
 Add a Comment
 
 
What is your proof? You say that "we all know" that athletes are all junkies but by telling me what I think you are not debating at all.

I know what the debate is on and I voted not to ban athletic competitions. By asking you for proof I was questioning the rationale behind your assertion - if you said that we should ban athletics because it's boring I might have tended to agree but you brought up the "all athletes are junkies" reason to support your argument?
 
 JulieR  25 Mar 2008 20:23
 1 Comment
 
 The debate is over whether athletic competitions should be scrapped, not whether athletes are drug users. Anyone who's been paying attention knows that they are. Whenever they are caught out, they say things like "Oh I was using some drugs, but not a banned one", "Oh I used that banned drug but only before it was banned". It's clear that all high-level athletes ingest substances they hope will improve their performance. There are many substances out there that the regulations don't even refer to.
by  Hidell
 25 Mar 2008 21:13
Comment
  
Comment
  
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Wales To Win Grandslam - Down To New Coach ?
Cheerleading Is A Sport!!!
Men And Women Should Join Together For A Football League
Boys Should Not Be Able To Play Netball If Girls Aren't Allowed To Play Football
Pats Cheerleader A Homewrecker
Tom Brady Is A Loser
Mark Cueto's Try Against South Africa Was A Try
Roger Clemens Use Steroids
Is Wales Going To Win The 6 Nations?
Dallas Cowboys Overall The Best Team In The NFL
New Debates
There Are No Gays In Iran
Religious Believers Should Be Subject To A Special Tax, The Proceeds Of Which Could Be Used To Compensate...
The Three Greatest Lies, Evolution, Atheism, And The Cheque Is In The Mail
The Advertisement: ''God Doesn't Exist Enjoy Yourself !'' Shouldn't Be Plastered On The Side Of London...
S Club 7 Is Garbage Forever!
The World Is One Big Lie!
Real Madrid Has Got A Lot Of Potential Players
Hockey Is Better Than Ice Hockey.
Michael Savage's Opinions Are Sometimes Very Agreeable
Republicans Are As Responsible For Big Government As Anyone Else.