» Home » Miscellaneous
Ascribing To A Religion Without Reading About Others Is Like Being Taught 2+2=5.
Without a understanding of mathematics 2+2 could very well equal five if that is what you are taught your whole life. Religion in this way is no different, if you are taught something to be true without weighing the body of knowledge that exists you can come to an incorrect conclusion. Catholics may believe 2+2=6 Hindu's may believe 2+2=7 Muslims may believe 2+2=8 They all have an answer to the problem but none is invariably correct.
 openurmind  07 Mar 2008 19:55
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
Maybe if you are really creative about math, maybe 2=2 DOES equal 5.

;-)
;-)
 
 Mystery  17 Dec 2008 03:08
 Add a Comment
 
 
This is how i always explain religion, lol. So true.
 
 iLoveJesus  06 Sep 2008 07:57
 Add a Comment
 
 
I think your analogy is a good one, though I don't believe the is a 2+2=4 on the earth right now..... If there was then Jesus wouldn't have need to come and the fighting started already in the new testiment....Budda was asked if he was the massiah, and he said (no, I'm just a man, who is wide awake)
 
 stever  21 May 2008 09:50
 Add a Comment
 
 
Agree,
so many religions are so similar anyway.
 
 martlamb  21 May 2008 09:42
 Add a Comment
 
 
I agree. If you are going to commit your life to something, you should seriously study all the other ways first. It opens your mind to new ways of thinking, and who knows, you might even get a different religion than you intended.
 
 Skave  16 May 2008 18:32
 Add a Comment
 
 
Agree, a child is a sponge when it comes to information and Religion is the type of information that a child would soak right up if subjected to it over and over again. Richard Dawkins said that Religion is like a virus, and comparing a child's level of gullibility to a weak immune system, a child would be highly susceptible to infection.

With regard to the numbers, they are just symbols! You could switch 4 and 6 and tell a child that's that, and they would grow up ignorant. But I'm sure if you told a child; 'if you have 2 rubber ducks, then take another 2 rubber ducks, you have 5 rubber ducks', it wouldn't be long before the child would recognise that it doesn't add up. Unless, of course, you made the symbol for four rubber ducks, 5!
 
 JRCBailey  08 Mar 2008 21:52
 5 Comments
 
 very interesting dawkins quote ,thank you for your contribution.
by  openurmind
 17 Mar 2008 16:45
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I think you won. No on disagrees.
 
 Jahwobble  08 Mar 2008 21:27
 2 Comments
 
 it's funny all of the religious debates have high numbers and strong opinions.
by  openurmind
 08 Mar 2008 22:07
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Wow no takers huh?
 
 openurmind  08 Mar 2008 21:25
 3 Comments
 
 A great debate topic but the 2+2=5 analogy threw me.
by  fusezhun
 08 Mar 2008 22:09
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
This story is true or at least it could be true...wink wink....i made it up OK....

I went to buy a car the other day. The salesman told me that the car would do 300mph(kmh). Used no gasoline, only water. Used no oil, only grape jelly. The exhaust was pure water, better than out of your tap. Drove by itself so i can sleep on my way to work. And, i could get it all for $399/month. I didn't buy the car.

The next day, i went to another salesman. He said this car gets 20 mpg. Uses very little oil. Exhaust is within the legal limits. And you can get it all for $399 per month. I bought the car.

In this case i had to go to 2 dealers. What if i had gone to the second one first? Would i have gone to 2?

Your response will be.... If you had gone to 3 you might have got it for $299/month!

I would then say... I was not looking for the best price. I was looking for the best car.

Your response...how do you know its the best car?

My response... Because i didn't feel the need to search anymore.
 
 created  17 Dec 2008 03:06
 2 Comments
 
 You will not know if it is the best car without looking and comparing it to all others; laziness or lack of inquisitiveness are not good reasons to choose anything.
by  openurmind
 21 Dec 2008 18:26
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I do not understand what you are trying to say. But i am almost positive you are wrong. This may seem contradictory much like in the example you gave. My certainty that you are wrong is the 5 while your certainty that you are absolutely right is the 2+2 but.... No wait... Still just a bad analogy.
I mean my head is really aching to understand. [people who don't read about other religions can't really know if theirs is right or not] is equal to [2+2=5]. Ok i get it now.... What your saying is simple but in fact the ways in which it is flatout wrong is SSOOOO confusing. But yea i still disagree.
 
 characters  17 Mar 2008 05:00
 3 Comments
 
 People often disagree with things they do not understand, that is the whole point I was making my analogy and you have further cemented my stance.
by  openurmind
 17 Mar 2008 16:44
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Without any true undeniable evidence for either views, who's to say what is right and wrong to teach. I totally disagree with forcing any belief in your child's face or anyone's for that matter. Religion, if anything, has many great moral lessons for people to learn at an early age. I agree that some go overboard. People should be given the opportunity to learn how to respect, love and understand others. There is nothing wrong with teaching your kids about your religion and beliefs, as long as you don't shelter them from others beliefs. And as long as they can go out into the world without bias and hate towards those who don't share the same beliefs. I think that people who don't ascribe to religion are also teaching their children to disagree with it without allowing them to draw their own conclusions. The last Christian children's Sunday school I attended handed out license plates that said ub4me. An hour long sermon about teaching children to respect and love other's because of their differences. An example of 2+2=4 in my opinion.
 
 roxanne  16 Mar 2008 20:44
 3 Comments
 
 Moral lesson can just as easily be taught without the use of religion as aesop's fables and others have done. If none can be proven then why disseminate untruths?
by  openurmind
 17 Mar 2008 16:48
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Illegal Immigration Is Wrong
Kids Should Be Allowed To Use "mary Jane" Under Parents Supervision
Women Like A Man Wearing Nylon Panties
If Your Comment Is Rejected Or Changed By Moderators, You Should Be Told Why
Peace Is A Dream, It Will Never Happen In Today's World
Gas Prices Keep Rising Because Of Fossil Fuel Needs Becoming Greater.
Girls Slumber Parties Are Funnier Than Boys
People Are Stupid
Hee Haw Was The Best Show Ever Broadcasted On Television.
Your Life Is Either A Good Example, A Lesson What Not To DO Or Not Worth Living
New Debates
Porn Industry Now Asking For A Bailout!
It Is OK For Every Lady To Have A Different Body Shape
Kung Fu Is The Best Martial Art In The World
Study In A Good University Is Too Expensive
Zola Was A Very Good Writer
Israel's Attitude Is Right Nowadays
Money Is The Cause Of Wars All Over The World
Facebook Is A Waste Of Time
Learning English Is Enjoyable
The Arabic People Have More Money