|
Yes, but I wouldn't go as far as to call the naysayers imbeciles.. They're merely misinformed, in
denial or skeptic... |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
And you'd be right. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Water is dry. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
When concerns about global warming first started to circulate, the retard right in America, fed, of
course, by the propaganda of the oil companies who stood to lose from the growth of environmental
consciousness, concocted their first propaganda strategy : There was no global warming. It was a
total myth.
After a number of years in which you had ridiculous statistical barriers being broken, with things
like 95% of the hottest years ever recorded being in the last 2 or 3 decades, when measurements have
been made since the 1860s, this strategy became untenable. So they evolved a new propaganda
strategy. This one was that, yes, global warming was occurring, but it was not being caused by
humans. This, too, is a bizarre fringe view well outside the mainstream of scientific consensus.
What is hilarious, though, but at the same time tragic, is to see these lumbering America retards
still following the first propaganda strategy : That global warming isn't occurring at all. They
obviously didn't get the memo about how the strategy has changed.
How deep down dumb does a person have to be to believe that global warming isn't occurring at all?
To ignore the masses of statistical evidence that point to a warming trend? One example of a vast
number :
Http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article3045976.ece
You have to be caveman dumb to believe there is no global warming. You have to be so dumb that you
have basically devolved from being a homo sapiens and gone back to being a Cro-Magnon.
What turns it from funny to tragic is that these imbeciles affect everyone else. They are pouring
our entire civilisation down the tubes of history with their stupidity. They are murdering your
grand-children and great-grandchildren just as surely as if they were cutting their throats in the
crib. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I'm agreeing with this debate's heading due to a technicality. Global Warming is occurring. That’s
a given. However, the “dangers” and “threats” of Global Warming as of now are highly
debatable. The scientific evidence has produced no outcome to which we can draw certainty from. To
assume that Global Warming is as bad as the media and environmentalists say it is to also assume
they’re honest and not simply out to make a buck. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Global Warming to my knowledge is definetly occurring as we speak. I figure that its causes are not
only high carbon emissions but also the natural cycle of our planet. There are plenty of facts that
support global warming, i'm not going to state any of them, but if you search them you will find
them. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
While there is evidence that the planet is warming, there isn't any evidence to suggest that it's
not a natural occurrence. We know that the sun is warming the planet more today than it did in the
past and that ambient temperatures are up because of it.
Unfortunately, you get too many braindead liberals running around screaming "THE SKY IS FALLING!"
when it's unclear whether man has any responsibility for what's happening, nor any way of changing
it even if we were. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Funny I heard that the scientist said the earth is in a circular orbit of the sun, which it does
every so often and that keeps us closer and warmer, until the earth goes back to it's normal
eliptical orbit. Now if that's true, then this is just a phase and not global warming at all. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Not true. There is actually an equal amount of evidence that counters global warming. For instance,
why would the North Pole be melting (it is) and the South Pole not be melting (it isn't) if there
was global warming. Personally, I believe that global warming exists, but I don't believe you an
imbecil if you deny global warming. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Anyone who denies global cooling has their head in the fridge. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Well said! I like your thorough reasoning backed up by facts! Your reasoned, balanced approach would
do any person proud. I especially like your use of that undeniable logic- "Imbecile". How can anyone
overcome that? Your careful quotation of data is admirable also. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
10 Sep 2008 00:03
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity