|
|
 |
|
Hm, interesting thought. We have no idea what the heck is going on in their tiny brains...but of
course, if they were superior to us, then they probably would have taken over the world by now. So
no, they aren't. Nice try though. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Ants don't enjoy consciousness, we do. Ants simply act out the same activities driven by instinct
alone whereas we are capable of abstract thought. In the event of a sudden, significant
environmental change, we are far more capable of adapting and surviving whereas they are not. We are
by far the most psychologically superior. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I do not think they are, but I do think that they could be a candidate for dominate species. Them
and Squirrels, Octopuses, and perhaps monkeys. Maybe monkeys. I doubt it though. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I think it's safe to say that whilst dolphins may threaten us in intelligence, ants don't. Ants show
no signs of use of tools, or most other signs of intelligence. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
On scale maybe but you aren't taking in the fact of size and intelligence level. Ants work together
to complete a task but cannot create powerful weapons, aka nukes guns anything that can really
destroy many people but only require a few to use. Proportionally to size though ants work together
better then humans. Humans are also very independent so if one is mentally destroyed it doesn't mean
they all are. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
They're smart, but let's think: Which species has made nuclear weapons, computers, the telephone,
and the lightbulb? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Psychologically our minds and brains are far superior. I was about to agree because I thought you
meant physiologically. That wouldn't meant their bodies are more fit for survival and they have
evolved better to be better in their environments. I think. Which they pwn us at |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
23 May 2008 03:08
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
