» Home » Pets
Animals Should Be Set Free
Some people eat dogs and cats and KILL THEM... Yo dude that's really wrong.
 sonic  25 Apr 2008 01:29
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
Yes on the 101 or the 405 during rush hour.
 
 keepmindok  25 Aug 2008 10:06
 Add a Comment
 
 
Animals SHOULD be set free! Free them!
 
 pandc35  06 Jun 2008 23:54
 Add a Comment
 
 
So you want to set animals free? Put them into our world? So that would mean that they would need rights, and they would have to be included under human laws, if said animals were to live in our world. This statement is clear, either they come to our rules, or we go to theirs, the choice is obvious.
So now animals are free, they have rights, and our protected and prosecuted under our laws, so what would happen to animals that eat their young? Attack other animals? Or people? Defecate in public? Fornicate in public?
So now all the animals are in big animals prison, and someone asks "why did we set them free in the first place?
"O well that because animals should be free, and we as humans will have to deal with being attacked and living a world fully of defecating, fornicating, wild animals"
"A huh, well that makes sense"
 
 Truth  10 Dec 2008 03:22
 Add a Comment
 
 
Cats and dogs are only seen as different because of cultural norms. Beyond that, as Cephus says. There is no difference.
 
 bishop  30 Apr 2008 18:05
 Add a Comment
 
 
I agree with TyWhyHiTy. It's their religion and beliefs. I know where you are common from and it is wrong but it's just the way those ppl are.
 
 celva_olva  27 Apr 2008 18:34
 Add a Comment
 
 
What's wrong is the way that they kill them.
They torture them.
In china, they beat and drag dogs in the middle of the street, then they choke them. Then, they skin them. And, finally, they go off to the market place.
 
 im_trumpet  25 Apr 2008 12:56
 1 Comment
 
 i forgive you
by  sonic
 01 May 2008 15:17
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Why is it wrong? What makes dogs and cats and different than cows and pigs? It's only cultural differences that we consider one group of animals pets and another food. In other countries, they have cows and pigs as pets and dogs and cats as food.

It's only cultural ignorance that has you demanding your way is somehow inherently superior to theirs.
 
 Cephus  25 Apr 2008 07:09
 Add a Comment
 
 
And we eat cows, chickens, and fish. Other countries and religions would disagree on this and look at it in disgust like we look at eating dogs. However, dogs are just another form of animal we've been given to eat. Yes, they're fun to have as pets, but they are just as equal as being meal food as any other animal. The same goes for all other pets.

And setting them free after years of putting them on a schedule where they're protected and fed would greatly drop the number of these animals very quickly.
 
 TyWhyHiTy  25 Apr 2008 02:21
 Add a Comment
 
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
An Animal Friend Can't Be Better Than A "good" Human Friend.
Puppy Mills Should Be Shut Down
Dogs Should Be Aloud In Owners Apartment.
Animal Testing Is Morally Wrong.
It Is Hypocritical For Some People To Protest Hate Or Agitate Action For Michael Vick 's Treatment Of...
More Should Be Done About Dangerous Dogs
Peta Are As Bunch Of Hypocritical Mindless Lying Thugs
BRUNO Is The Greatest Dog Name Ever
They Should Make All Pets 100-200 Dollars Each
Animal Testing Should Only Be On Rats
New Debates
Your Computer Occurred In Nature.
Drugs Should Be Legal.
There Are No Gays In Iran
Some People Said Love Is Wicked, How Far It Is Rue
Religious Believers Should Be Subject To A Special Tax, The Proceeds Of Which Could Be Used To Compensate...
The Three Greatest Lies, Evolution, Atheism, And The Cheque Is In The Mail
The Advertisement: ''God Doesn't Exist Enjoy Yourself !'' Shouldn't Be Plastered On The Side Of London...
S Club 7 Is Garbage Forever!
The World Is One Big Lie!
Real Madrid Has Got A Lot Of Potential Players