» Home » Pets
Animal Testing Is Sick And WRONG!!!!
I think that you should not test animal because it defaces there pride and sometimes it may kill the animals and make up is one of the worst things for animal testing
 princess  12 Feb 2008 21:19
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
Yeah, I agree it is sick for cosmetics and other household products, but NOT for health benefits.
 
 Starburst  11 Dec 2008 05:51
 Add a Comment
 
 
I totally agree animals have rights just as much as humans and they should be treated like humans, you don't see humans getting tested on now do you
 
 lollipops  17 Nov 2008 09:47
 Add a Comment
 
 
They should find other ways instead of using animals
 
 naz  19 Oct 2008 17:30
 Add a Comment
 
 
ANIMAL TESTING IS WRONG! We don't need to test on anything! It is disgusting and horrible and we just gonna have to put up with a few deaths! We are equal to all animals! If we were stripped of our guns and knifes and put in to nature we would die because we are almost the lowest on the food chain! Animals for years have been serving on their own!
 
 fingers15  14 Sep 2008 14:22
 2 Comments
 
 Technically, it isn't just a few deaths that we are "just gonna have to put up with", it's easy for you to say is you are not vunerable to getting athsma attacks, aids, diabetic fits, allergic reactions, sistic vibrosis or other life threatening conditions. With out animal testing 60% - 70% of us would be dead. Nice huh?

Plus, stripped of guns and knives, we still have brains, brains which make new ones, which is why we have them in the first place. Even so, we could kill animals without guns and knives...
by  Hermione82
 14 Sep 2008 20:25
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Animal testing is so bad would you like it if someone cut you open and test thing on you that can even kill you.
 
 Jo_Jazz  11 Sep 2008 09:38
 1 Comment
 
 Well, experiments are more like operations, it isn't as simple as Cutting open and testing something on an animal. For an experiment in which vivisection must be used, the animal is under a general aneasthetic and cannot feel anything.
by  Hermione82
 14 Sep 2008 20:30
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Animal testing is absolutely disgusting.
We don't test on ourselves; so why should we test on animals?
They have the same rights as we do.
 
 ShoutItOut  13 Jun 2008 11:42
 1 Comment
 
 Actually, we DO test on ourselves, just organisations like PETA aren't as interested in that.
by  Hermione82
 14 Sep 2008 20:36
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Cosmetics yes, medicine, NO
 
 martlamb  22 May 2008 21:58
 1 Comment
 
 Me too, but most animal tests are with medicine.
by  Hermione82
 14 Sep 2008 20:44
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
No doubt about it, it's wrong & cruel.
I can't believe people test stuff on animals and can manage to live with themselves everyday, it's sick.
 
 MetalXGrl  08 May 2008 15:42
 1 Comment
 
 But it'd also be sick to say to the parents of a dying baby that their new-born must die to save a lab-rat.
by  Hermione82
 16 Sep 2008 22:39
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
It is most definetly wrong! I believe that if anyone is going to test it, it should be a volunteer. Obviously, animals can't volunteer, as we don't understand them. Therefore, no animals should be tested on. It's as simple as that.
 
 lavatis  08 May 2008 14:03
 1 Comment
 
 People do voluteer, just not enough of them. So animals NEED to be tested on - and to keep it fair to them they are given high quality food, healthcare and housing in return.
by  Hermione82
 16 Sep 2008 22:41
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
It is one of the horrible things that we do as humans.

If you are against this debate, you all should be ashamed of yourselves.
 
 im_trumpet  25 Apr 2008 13:09
 2 Comments
 
 And here we have what i talked about in my post.
by  maugatar
 01 Jul 2008 22:58
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
It's so bad. Animals are being taken advantage of just because they don't have a voice to speak out and say 'hey, i don't wanna be treated like this. I'm off' i know this place where they rescued animals and when their better or w.e people can adopt them and look after them so they get a good chance in life. I think animal testing is a wasting life. People say 'sure but animals die soon anyway' it's still wrong. To test cosmetics like lipstick, they feed an animal sticks of it to see how many before they die. To test shampoo they hold their eyes open and drop concentrated shampoo in their eyes.

Although, it has come to saving people's lives. I suppose this subject depends on whether you look at the big picture or small one. Big picture- you save people. Small picture- lots of animals are being tortured and slaughtered.
 
 kitten  13 Apr 2008 19:47
 1 Comment
 
 who would you rather have them test cosmetics on? people?
by  the_atom
 31 Jul 2008 02:06
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Yes it is
 
 drakula  26 Feb 2008 23:22
 1 Comment
 
 and yet you've called yourself drakula
by  Hermione82
 16 Sep 2008 22:48
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I 100% agree with this. SHAC support animal rights. And i think more people should be aware of what happens in places like HLC where they test on animals.

They are not just tested on, they are wrongfully mistreated, cut up, used and left to die - dogs, monkeys, rabbits etc used for their work, put through pain, misery, not ever getting the chance to see daylight

stuffed in a cage a lone waiting to die after being used in a foul way for things such as perfumes disgusts me.
Imagine yourself as one of those harmless animals.

What they go through and the state they are left in is disturbing.
Something needs to be done about this. It is not right. Nor is it in any way humane
 
 L-S-E  19 Feb 2008 14:25
 Add a Comment
 
 
Animal testing is WRONG
how would you like been in a lab and having different things tested on you ? No animal should have to go through tests to make sure things are ok for humans
 
 mel2612  19 Feb 2008 13:53
 Add a Comment
 
 
I don't think testing on animals is right, they can't tell us no. It's sick and disgusting! Besides the reactions animals may have could be different, then the reactions we may have. Humans have the ability to say no, so we should test on humans. I would totally try out skin cream, or a new brownie mix or whatever, to save a few animals. It's just horrible.
 
 baconbust  14 Feb 2008 14:20
 1 Comment
 
 Enough people are being tortured and dying in grisly ways. don't make it main stream.
by  the_atom
 31 Jul 2008 02:10
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
It is wrong and you should all know it
 
 princess  12 Feb 2008 21:22
 1 Comment
 
 That's not a rational position. That's a logical fallacy. *WHY* is it wrong? Appealing to emotion is a sure sign you have no real argument.
by  Cephus
 13 Feb 2008 00:08
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Technically, it isn't just a few deaths that we are "just gonna have to put up with", it's easy for you to say is you are not vulnerable to getting asthma attacks, aids, diabetic fits, allergic reactions, sistic vibrosis or other life threatening conditions. With out animal testing 60% - 70% of us would be dead. Nice huh?
 
 Hermione82  14 Sep 2008 20:23
 Add a Comment
 
 
Not finding cures is sick and wrong.

Unless it becomes a World Health Organization rule not to produce vaccines and medicines tested or derived from animals, then it will continue, and if it didn't then it will be survival of the fittest.
 
 keepmindok  14 Sep 2008 16:26
 Add a Comment
 
 
If you don't like animal testing, i assume you've never taken any kind of medicine as they are all tested on animals. Cosmetic testing on animals i agree is sick, but pharmaceutical testing is vital. The sad fact is that a minority of people against animal testing are fanaticly bullies who use lies and intimidation to force people to accept their beliefs and that's just pathetic.
 
 maugatar  01 Jul 2008 22:57
 Add a Comment
 
 
If we can't test on animals what do we test on?
 
 Mark  22 May 2008 21:49
 Add a Comment
 
 
So I guess humans is your second option?
 
 moreno  22 May 2008 21:46