|
|
 |
|
Yes it is but it can help save our lives!! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
How is it morally correct to allow a human to suffer to protect an animal? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Most humans are innocent and don't deserve to suffer either.
Seriously, nowadays researchers are treating their animals very well because if an animal is in
pain, it will alter the results of the experiments and render them useless. If the death of an
animal saves a human, it's worth it. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
If it benefits humans, then the ends justify the means. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
I'm kind of on the fence about this one, but in the interest of self-preservation i have to agree
with johnshier. Medical testing is pretty much necessary right now. But testing them for make-up and
other cosmetics is just stupid. Although i don't think they skin them whilst they are still alive
johnshier. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
I refuse to use something that hasn't been tested on animals. Better them than humans, and that is
ultimately what my morals are based on.
I care about a cure for cancer, a cure for HIV, and cures for all sorts of things.
There are all sorts of dumb tests that I don`t care about, ex. Make-up, but I believe that animal
testing the same as eating animals.
Testing them for make-up is kind of like skinning them alive to make fur, useless but some dumb
bitches think it`s worth it. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|