|
I am on this side because I agree; however, I do have to point something out.
You say that "America lacks real leadership" and then say that "real leadership can be defined in
your personal opinion". Well, if that is the case, then which is it? How can you say that America
lacks "real" leadership when you leave the definition of "real" leadership out? So can leadership
be defined or not? If it is subjective, then your statement is no good. What do you believe? Does
America lack "real" leadership or not? If it does, then surely it can be defined. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Awwwwww coooome ooonnnnn....You're talking George Bush here.... At least wait till after the next
election. America hasn't had a leader since President Chan...I mean Bush was elected. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No matter how you define "real leadership", bush isn't it. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
14 Oct 2008 22:36
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
