|
Circumcision is the best thing you can do. |
| |
 Mark  29 May 2008 18:36
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
It is only mentally disturbed who still believe "circumcision", or Male Genital Mutilation as
it's properly called, either having apotemnophilia for wanting it done to themselves, or
acrotomophilia for wanting it done to others. If you're so into cutting off parts of your
body that appear naturally, why not cut off your hands while you're at it? It makes as much
sense.
En.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apotemnophilia
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acrotomophilia
As for the idea that it's "healthier", it's a load of BS, lies and myths that only the ignorant
believe; foreskins occur naturally for a reason. There are only three causes for this barbarity to
continue to be inflicted on children:
1) Tradition, about as good a reason as "honour killings" in islamic countries
2) Religious drivel, which has no justification whatsoever
3) Doctors make money from it, charging the parents money for sexually mutilating children, often
without the parents' permission
If I ever have a son and the doctor tries to cut off the skin of his penis head, I guarantee I will
cut the skin off the doctor's cranial head. And since those Doctor Mengeles tie down the babies and
cut off their skin without any anaesthetic as the infants are screaming in pain, I would make sure
the doctor was tied down and awake to feel every knife cut. |
| |
 K9 20 Sep 2008 12:58
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
What is right for some isn't right for everyone. We aren't even all made the same. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It’s healthier and cleaner? So is washing your genitals. And I’d like to see statistics about
how circumcision is a product of a better relationship. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Why? Please provide some evidence |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Yea, and when they come to have kids that's going to be a huge problem. And any way that's taking
their right away. It should be a choice whether to have it done or not. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
One of the weirder things left over from ancient religious belief. The purpose of circumcision is to
lessen sexual pleasure. Absolutely bizarre that people would choose to perform this painful and
deprivating procedure to infants they should love. I have two big, strong, uncircumcised sons and I
wish them all the sexual pleasure nature intended them to have. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Why should babies be subjected to cosmetic surgery at such a young age when there are just as many
reasons against Circumcision as there are for it?
As for you saying "Men also have better relations once they have been snipped."
Where did you get that from?
That coupled with the following I ask...Why should it be necessary?
More information is available here:
Http://www.mothersagainstcirc.org/med-argu.htm
http://www.canadiancrc.com/Circumcision_Genital_Mutilation_Male-Female_Children.aspx
http://www.circumcision.org/index.htm
I honestly believe that it comes down to personal choice and is a decision that should not be taken
lightly considering it has been shown to not be medically necessary. I do not agree that all males
should go through this without a justifiable reason. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Not sure how far i should go on this with specific details. I am, he isn't. I need some
lubricatory assistance (made up word) to keep things in good working order (helps avoid
irritations), he doesn't.
But the hood looks odd. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No thanks. I am happy with my polo neck.
What reason have you got for saying men have better relations after the snip? I am at a loss to
think of how the two are connected (pun intented). |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
