|
|
 |
|
But George Washington is the one who set the precedent for how everything would be handled in the
future, and he voluntarily gave up power both after the war and after his presidency, which shows a
lot of character if you ask me. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Hidell summed it up...he was a bad president and started many of the bad trends that the government
has in place today. And as far as your other choices, there were terrible too...there are all
socialists |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No, he just gets a lot of credit for finally ending slavery, which was a long time in the making. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No I go for R.R. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Lincoln was a tyrant. He didn't care at all about black people. In fact, he wanted to ethnically
cleanse the United States of them by sending them back to Africa or down to Latin America. What's
more, the Southern states had every right to secede. He deserved what he got. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I never met the man, but I hear good things. I just love four-score and seven years ago. Seeing as
how 87 is my number. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No.
He said, "To the victor goes the spoils", and it is true, but he was not a good man.
Robert E. Lee was Lincoln's Better, by far.
And then some.
The Civil War was not really about Slavery: It was actually fought about States Rights. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
09 Oct 2008 02:38
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
