|
Abortions should be banned because those were your decisions. You can't just take a life so yours
won't become better. Your decisions our actions your consequences all a baby needs is love from its
mother, someone's life shouldn't end because you decided to have sex. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Nobody deserves to be made but then not having a chance at life. The kid could have been the next
Bill Gates or Michael Jordan. If you're going to get pregnant and have a child, just send them to a
foster home instead of taking their life. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Yes. Abortion is absolutely murder.
We all agree that it is wrong and murder to kill for example a 3 month old baby (at least all of us
taht are sane). Why is it wrong? Because that baby is a human. Most people have no problem with
killing a 3 month old bug, but think killing a human is wrong.
There are 2 ways to go about this issue: Scientifically and philisophically
Scientifically, at the moment of conception, that cell is human. It is also Whole, Distinct, and
Living--scientific fact.
Philisophically, The only differences between the unborn baby and a newborn baby are: [1] Size, [2]
Level of Development, [3] Environment, and [4] Degree of Dependence.
1. Size: A newborn baby is usually bigger than an unborn baby. It is wrong to kill an newborn baby
(we all agree on that). We don't kill short people or tall people just because of their size; it is
wrong. Therefore, that is not a valid reason for abortion.
2. Level of Developement: A newborn baby is usually more developed than an unborn baby. Think of
your life on a timeline
in Womb 5yrs 30yrs 70yrs
Say you are 30yrs old. You are the same person as when you were 10yrs. Your cells are different,
but you are the same person. You will be the same person when you are 70 (assuming you live till
then) your cells are different, but you are the same person. You were the same person when you were
5yrs. Your cells were different, but you are the same person. When you were in your mothers womb,
you were the same person. Your cell(s) were different, but you were still you. Level of Developement
does not change who the person is. They are still the same person. A person's level of developement
does not change who they are so a person' level of developement does not justify abortion.
3. Environment: A baby out of the womb cannot be killed, but a baby in the womb can be, Why? I dont
know. Say you were bron in California, but moved to North Carolina. Just because you moved
environments doesn't change your value. It is not suddenly fine to kill you because you moved. Why
is it that way for babies? Environment does not change the baby or its worth. So, Environment is not
a valid reason for abortion.
4. Degree of Dependence: The unborn baby is totally dependent on his/her mother. Say you have an 11
yr. Old daughter who is becoming independent. She can cook and take care of herself; however, she is
diagnosed with type 1 diabetese and needs 3+ shots of insulin a day and has to check her blood sugar
7+ times a day. She becomes very dependent on her parents again. Does that make it okay to kill her?
NO! Of course not! But for some strange, unknown reason it is okay to do that with babies. Degree of
dependency is not a valid excuse for abortion.
Some people may say, "What about cases of rape?!"
Rape is a special case that should be dealt with differently. Of abortions in the U.S. Rape+incest
make up less than 2% of abortions. However, say you dont have an abortion, and every time you look
at your daughter who is here because you were raped, you think about that moment. The worst moment
of your life! Would you say that it is okay to kill that toddler, no. Than why would you kill that
innocent baby?
Some people who are against animal testing are for abortion. Talk about defending the helpless. An
animal can at least howl, bite and fight. An unborn baby can do nothing but squirm around. Why don't
we defend them? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
We understand if a woman was raped being as if it was by a stranger, someone she knew, a family
member.... There is a life within her, they did not ask to be here not saying she wanted to get
pregnant but any of the aboved named people, she have other options outside of abortions. What if
your mom was raped but instead of aborting you she kept you because u was a GIFT from god. If a
woman do not want to keep a baby she can always GIVE IT UP FOR ADOPTION.... I THINK THIS GENERATION
NEEDS TO GET IT TOGETHER BECAUSE THE THINGS THAT IS ALLOWD TO HAPPEN IS NOT
RIGHT.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Yes it should be! EXCEPT for rape victims? Maybe? Idk its still a life ud be killng |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I just think it should. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Agreed. We have a modern-day holocaust and society turns their head, just like Germany in WWII. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
So first of all, Abortion is a form of murder and demeans the value of human life.Anyway abortions
would increase if it were made illegal, leading to increased risk of young women dying or becoming
sterile.It should nanned for several reasons like :1)Abortion eliminates legal rights of the unborn
child.2)Abortion exposes women to various health risks and the danger of losing fertility.If it will
be baned or ligalazied futurre mother would think about it carefully and would'nt face to problems
with their health .3)Abortion is against doctors' Hippocratic Oath.Also we can see that nowadays a
lot of domcotrs can do every thing for money, even it may run a risk of human life |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Abortion should be banned, of course. Most of women do it because they think that they could not
feed children because of poverty. But it's not true, if God gives you such kind of mercy, you should
accept it, even it is very hard. If God gives you a baby, it means that He also will give you
livelihood. It is wisdom!
But, of course, if pregnance and childbirth are dangerous for woman's life and there is no any
chance to change the situation, it is better to make an abortion in order to save the life of woman. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
All abortion shouldn't be banned. However in most cases I think it should. Only if the mother is in
server mental or physical distress, and this is stated by a medical professional, then the child
should be aborted. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Life is sacred. The moment a baby is conceived it is a living, precious human being with a future.
Calling them fetuses and making scientific rationalizations about how they can't feel pain and other
such clinical arguments dehumanizes them and makes it possible for people to justify abortion to
themselves. The reality is that they are a small, growing, real human being. Being inside the womb
does not determine their humanity. Who are you to say that one minute it is a fetus and abortion is
fine, and the next moment it's born and to kill it would be murder? Killing for convenience is not
an option. Renaming things doesn't change what they truly are. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Abortion decreases infant morality and lessens the price of life, abortion is the same as murder so
why dont those mothers who abort their child go to jail?!?!?! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Abortion is killing a life, an obviously alive life, separate from the mother. A fetus has nerves,
and can feel pain. Also, just because a baby is young, doesn't mean it is OK to kill it. A fetus
is a human in the stages of development, like a toddler or adolescent. It has no say in what
happens, so we shouldn't decide for it and just kill it. It is innocent life. |
| |
 AJKA  13 Nov 2012 22:27
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
By aborting an embryo, you can accidentally kill the potential genius. For instance : Among 1000
aborted there are 4 or 5 are talented who can change our word dramatically. Maybe they are the only
one who can invent the time machine or the perpetual motion machine or some kind of other devices
that we are not able even to imagine!
Also if Thomas Edison , Bill Gates,brother Wrights and other famous inventors were aborted, we
wouldn't live on the same conveniences life! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Abortion is murder. Nothing more and nothing less. It's taking away a child's chances to live, to be
themselves when the time come. Just because the fetus is not a "human" yet, does not mean it isn't
murder. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Abortion IS MURDER!!! To say that a fetus isn't a human is INSANE!! Doctors have taken x-rays of
pregnant mothers and WITHIN THE FIRST TRIMESTER you can already see the babies features forming and
his heart begins to beat within that time. Numerous studies have been done on this. No one should
ever dought it again now. For those of you who think it's ok to kill a being inside the womb think
of it this way.... It is the same thing as if you birthed the baby and then you just took a knife
and slit his/her throat. That's a little more graphic, but it's the same thing. You just don't
want to think about it because you like having "choice" that violates another HUMAN BEING's life!! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Abortion is pure murder the government should arrest abortion doctors and women who get them |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It should be because the concept of abortion is basically killing a child. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Nobody here would support abortion If you could hear your grandmother in tears pleading for her
daughter to cancel the scheduled abortion. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Yes it should be banned but even if it is it will always still be happening |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I agree it is murder
http://www.youtube.com/user/lodicyd?feature=guide |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I think it shuld b banned cuz its wrong to kill a person. Thise babies r people not choices. How
wuld u like it if ur mom aborted u?? Wat about those babies who will never c the world all becuz
their mom wuz cruel enough to kill her own child. If u dont want the baby just PUT IT UP FOR
ADOPTION!! Gosh, r the peopl in this society stupid?!? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Abortion is wrong. As a Christian, I believe God created humans to be different from other animals.
One of the Ten Commandments is "thou shalt not kill", and Jeremiah 1:5 says "Before you were in the
womb, I knew you, before you were born I set you apart." Therefore, when killing a foetus, you are
killing a human being. People who are "pro-choice" will not call it a baby, they will call it a
fetus to dehumanize it. According to "pro-choice" stances, a person a second before being born is a
"fetus", but a person a second after being born is a human. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
How is it right to kill a living thing? Some people have one if they are told the child is going to
be disabled which is wrong and lazy. If you was told your child could never walk again would you
kill it? No well its the same thing ass killing the child before its born because to be able to see
the child is disabled it must be at a late stage in the pregnancy. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Noone has the right to destroy a life! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Because of humman rights |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Yes, it is a immoral act that destroys life for one's selfish acts and for convenience. It is MURDER
whether anyone wants to admit it or not.
All medical doctors have their own opinion on the matter for this is mostly a debate on morals.
Medically it was "ok" to many doctors to remove part of a person's brain for "function" at mental
hospitals from the 1970's and under, including also using shock therapy. Why does this matter,
because you want to quote doctors but I could also quote from doctors that will negate what your
doctors are saying. This a debate on morals....do "YOU" think it is right..yes you do..now convince
me a reason why supporting it is good.
-Here I will refute many statements pro-choicers make
1. "IT'S A WOMAN'S RIIGHT TO MAKE THIS DECISION. ABORTION IS A CIVIL ISSUE"-average pro-choicer
-All of our RIGHTS ARE LIMITED by the extent to which we infringe on the rights of others. My right
to swing my arm end when my fist reaches your nose. Freedom of speech does not grant the right to
false advertising or libel. A woman does have the right to choose whether or not to invite or risk
pregnancy by participating in sexual activity, but does not have the right to decide whether another
person should live or die.
2. "But it's just a blob of tissue. It's obviously not a person with rights! It's only a potential
person"-average pro-choicer
-The fact that life begins at conception is a fact of Biology. However, we all have a mental image
of what a "person" is supposed to look like, based on the mature people we have seen. Preborns do
not match that image. But one might also have a mental image of a "tree" as something large and well
developed, which does not match newly planted, 'stick' trees. But 'stick' trees really are trees,
just young and undeveloped. Similarly, preborns really are people, just young and undeveloped.
-Preborns are not "potential people" but people with potential. The word potential has two different
meanings. A lottery ticket and a check are both mere pieces of paper with the potential for being
exchanged for a large sum of money. But while the lottery ticket has only a "possibility" for such
an exchange, and is worth little, the check has the "capability" of that exchange and has the same
value as the cash itself. Eggs and sperm are like lottery tickets with the possibility of joining
with one another to form a new person, but a preborn human is like the check-possessing the same
value as the adult he or she will eventually grow to becom, later in the continuum of his or her
life.
3. "The supreme court has said that abortion is a fundamental right in our country"
-The supreme court has been wrong before. The dred scott decision in 1857 said that slaves were
property and could never be citizens, and that the federal government had no right to prohibit
slavery in the territories. Pre-born children are not the property of their parents, but separate,
"human" individuals. Many legal experts criticize Roe v. Wade as a bad decision-based on the
so-called right to privacy somehow vaguely "found" in either the 14th or the 9th amendment-but never
explicitly mentioned anywhere in the constitution.
4. "The child has no rights until birth, when it becomes independent of the mother."
-Newborns are still completely dependent on other for care, as are many handicapped individuals.
Dependency does not take away the fact that the individual is a person with rights. Infants in later
pregnancy can in fact, be helped to survive outside the womb, but abortion is still legal up through
the entire nine months of pregnancy.
-While birth is a major milestone in development, the process of emerging from the womb does not
change the essential nature of the child. Does it make sense that the child has no rights one day
before birth, but suddenly acquires rights the next day when they are born? What about two days? A
week? A month? There is no significant transformation in the nature of the child at any point after
conception itself. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I believe so as well. Abortion is taking an innocent life away and can be compared to systematic
murder. The only time abortion should ever be an option is when the baby poses a life threatening
medical threat towards the mother bearing the baby. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It's not the baby's fault the parents weren't safe. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Abortion should definitely be banned for a number of reason's. Here in the UK there was uproar &
outrage that some people from some countries were using abortion to select gender particularly that
of girls, yet apparently is fine to get rid of a baby if you dont know the sex, pro abortionist just
make themselves sound stupid when they say things like that.
Also here in the UK, despite numerous ways to prevent pregnancy & more information available than
ever before, over 200,000 abortions happen each year,up from 175,000 the year before.
Also there are 2 main reason's they call the unborn baby a foetus, firstly it's so it doesnt
interfear with a Doctor's theocratic oath to save lives & not take them, & secondly so the women
having it doesnt feel so bad as calling it a foetus takes away some of its humanity.
Also why is it the pro choice people are quoting pro choice for the women but not for the farther
or the unborn baby, how hypercritical is that.
Also all you pro choice people, next time you watch the news or read an article about child abuse
& how the abuser should pay badly for what they have done, dont bother as your a hypercrit with no
freedom of speech to say that as your in favour of baby killing.
Also as someone else said, the only freedom abortion has given women is to be just or more
promiscuous as men supposedly were
hence a massive increase in more upwanted prenancy's, & more sexualy transmitted diseases than ever
before, well done moralless society,what an achievement, you must be so proud.
I would say one more thing, the bible shows what God thinks about abortion in an illustration of 2
men fighting in a room with a pregnant women, if the women was hurt but the baby was fine they had
to pay compensation, however if the baby dies, both men were to be put to death.
So all pro choice people should prey God dosnt exist as if he does then your all screwed.
One message to Antares, most of your argument lies on the bases of you saying the early stages of a
babies development is a mass of cells. Problem is dude all life is a mass of cells including you & I
so whats the difference, other than they havent yet been born yet.
One last point why do all the person's who keep stating it's a personal choice keep completly
dismissing the farthers or the unborn babies choice, I wonder if in case of the women it's to hide
their personal guilt & in the male's supporters case, to get rid of an unwanted problem due to
cheating on their partner, or the other biggy "I'm not ready to be a dad yet, I'm young I still
wanna have my fun".The problem with that attitude is sex has become like playing a video game or
watching a movie, something you do for a bit of fun without worrying about the consequences. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Teens who get pregnant & seem to see the term abortion as a solution to everything. A mindset of
such where pregnancy is totally fine because a solution is provided. And soon that solution becomes
a commodity people will misuse. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Yes!
It's practically murder !
You're killing a little baby.
If you didn't want it, then use a condom or birth control !
And plus, that child could become famous, could change the world, and if you murder the baby, it
will never have a chance to live or see the world. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
You created a child, do not kill it, Abbortion is basically murder, i dont think anyone would like
to have been aborted.
If you didnt want the baby, you should have used a condom in the first place people! |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
I think you also need to take into consideration why the woman wants an abortion. For example: If
you were a victim of a rape or you're 15 and won't be able to care for the child. I can assure you
when a woman has an abortion the baby doesn't care (it isn't developed enough to know what's going
on). In the majority of cases when a woman gets an abortion she is doing the baby a favor, and if
not, so what, the baby doesn't care. (Oh and btw, I'd be fine if we discouraged abortion much more
if we made birth control much more readily available) |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Abortion is the choice of a woman since it is her body. If she has a 99% risk of dying while giving
birth then she should have the right to abort the baby. Although it would be hard think about it
would you want your kid to take his or hers first steps without you and have another person ti call
mommy. Also abortion can be an advantage to the un-born baby sometimes such as the situation of the
baby having very severe medical conditions. No one would want their kid to be born and live a
suffer in life. However I do not support abortion if it is "oh , oops ". People should own up to
their mistakes and take care of their child in that case or if they are too young or have financial
difficulties adopt their kid out to a loving family that they trust. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
A baby is nothing more than a parasite. Some want to keep it and some don't. If its not your body
you have no right to say what someone can or can not do. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
You cannot value a POTENTIAL life over an actual life - if the mother was endangered, there would be
no justice in allowing her to have the baby, which could essentially kill both the mother and child. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
And if they were raped? Or they are a young teen? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
What about all the billions of combinations of lives that are possible for every egg a woman doesn't
fertilize with every sperm of every male on the planet? That is a HUGE number of lives that will
never ever ever exist because you did not get pregnant in the first place. What is one more
combination? One egg plus one sperm? Why does that person deserve to live when all the others don't? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Of course not. Each person is free and can do whatever they want. For instance the girl was raped
and so it turned out that she became pregnant what should she do in such situation? Or doctor said
that the baby is not normal, so what's the reason to bring this poor child to this world? Abortion
can't be banned. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
How about if the woman is raped, her life is on the line, she's a teen who is pregnant, or her baby
isn't going to make it anyway, what about those?
I say banning abortion is wrong because in those cases where it is best to have an abortion the
woman will NOT be allowed to decide to get that abortion and chances are will be denied. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It's up to the woman since it is her body. However I am against it once the fetus has developed the
ability to feel pain. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I think 7 billion people is plenty |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I would be died then |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Women have the right to decide what they do with their bodies, especially when their bodies are
being used as incubators to supply housing and nutrients. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Stop pretending to be "pro-life", because what you really are is anti-choice. A study by Dr Stuart
Derbyshire of the University of Birmingham has shown that foetuses cannot feel pain as it "requires
mental development that only occurs outside the womb" (more
information:http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/health/4905892.stm). This directly contradicts false claims
made by anti-choice activists that foetuses can respond to stimuli from 20 weeks. Who do you trust:
A recognised medical doctor or a slurry of evangelical loudmouths? It's the woman's body, let her
choose!
Is abortion really "always evil" as you say? What if the mother has been raped, and what about if
the mouth's life is in danger, such as in the case of an ectopic pregnancy? For those unaware of
this, an ectopic pregnancy is one in which the baby gorws outside the utrine cavity.It is
potentially life-threatening to the mother due to the risk of haemorrhage and occurs in up to 1% of
pregnancies. Isn't the life of a living person more important than that of an embryonic one?
Furthur information:http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2010/en#/O00 |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It should be up to the women what she chooses to do to her body in this case. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
A fetus isn't alive, so it's not murder. Killing cells isn't murder, otherwise ejaculation would be
genocide, and I don't see many "pro-life" people campaigning to stop male masturbation.
Learn some science people, it's depressing to think people actually believe the religious bullshit. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Uh, no. Who wants to keep the child of someone who raped them? A crazy person at that. Sure it is
life, but it is not such a good idea to keep that baby, as it is a constant reminder that you were
raped. What if teens were having sex with their boyfriends, got pregnant, and baby-day hopped up and
said "Time to go!" I think that if women want to get abortions than they can and they should. I only
disagree with getting an abortion because you hate kids. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Says the man who ate chicken wings for dinner last night. Nice try, buddy, but if you don't have a
vagina and you're not pregnant you can't make the decisions. |
| |
 Atha 21 Aug 2012 00:59
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I'm a religous person but I have to say that what about if a woman got raped by a stranger or
something, it's her body, she has the right to choose if she wants to keep the child, she didn't ask
to become pregnant did she? She has her own life to live e.g. College, job, relationship, family.
You can't ruin a person's life by getting them pregnant or by saying "no don't abort it that's
inhumane", If she wants to go on with the pregnancy it's her choice, if she doesn't it's because she
dosen't have the time or resources for the child and the fact that it was unplanned. I would say if
an abortion is necessary, do it early on. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Something could be wrong with the baby, like it's deadly sick and can;t be rescued |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Should not be banned but doesnt mean its justified.
Its a choice. Everyone deserves to have a choice.
I mean, if someone cant afford to have a kid and then gets pregnant, better for the kid to be
aborted if they are gonna suffer a lot. But then thats also a choice. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
A fetus is about as alive as a tree |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
What is wrong with destroying a few parasitic cells?
Modern western democracies are founded upon the ideals of liberty - and you propose to take away the
rights and freedoms of the mother, in favour of the *possibility* of a child? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Well, i feel that it is the woman's choice... |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I don't agree. Expecting mothers could be totally unfit for motherhood. They could be too young (14,
15, 16?), and usually I would say that they should have the baby, but only if they had support. If
they don't have support from other people they are NOT ready to be a parent.
They could be faced with a HUGE, life-altering decision. There are tests to show whether your
babies will have problems, and some families can not afford to care for a baby with, say, autism or
down's. Some families can't cope with the emotional damage and stress that's bound to come along
with it at some points.
Therefore, I do not agree. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No abortion doesn't kill life, it gets rid of a bunch of cell from the woman's uterus. |
| |
raya 16 Jun 2012 14:49
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
What if you cant afford to have the baby and raise it? And you dont want the baby going into the
foster care system to be victemized? What if you have a history of mental illness and could kill
your own baby anyway a few wks after its born or you have a history of diseases in your family that
almost guarantee you pass one to your baby and you got pregnant by accident and dont want the baby
to suffer all its life? So many factors to this. If its banned everywhere then women will not only
kill the fetus but themselves performing abortions on themselves and each other in order to prevent
a possible miserable life for themselves and the babies. 15% or more of all conceptions are
naturally aborted from womens bodies and usually you dont ever know your pregnant. Your body does
it all the time own its own and you dont usually fight for that baby! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
What if i get pregnant?! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I believe under exceptional circumstances such as rape, incest and the risk of the mother's life
abortion should be an option. We need balance between the two extremes and banning abortion outright
would cause more grief than is necessary. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I believe it should be up to the individual to decide, depending on what they believe in. You
shouldn't force your beliefs on someone else who doesn't believe them. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Only in cases of rape, incest, or where the mother or child may not survive the pregnancy. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Abortion shouldn't be banned! I know that you say people are lots of families are willing to adopt
but obviously that's not a very valid reason considering how many kids AREN'T adopted. Also you
PROBABLY don't have a child yourself so you don't know how hard it would be to give up a child. Ask
one of your parents if they would have been able to give you up. Plus what if like a drug addict
got pregnant, its better she get an abortion then put her child through a life of misery. And
children born to teenagers have a way higher chance of becoming a teen parent themselves and/or
having a life of crime. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
If it wasn't legal women would go to drastic measuers to relieve themselfs of there "burden".
Besides its purley s persons personal choice and something they will have to live with |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Abortion should not be banned. It is a personal choice of the woman considering it. You say "Any
life is innocent." What does that mean? ANY life? So was Hitler innocent? Osama Bin Laden as
well?
Killing cannot be avoided unfortunately. We must kill to eat. Even if you don't eat meat, all plants
are life as well, therefore you are taking their life by eating them.
There does come a stage in pregnancy where abortion is no longer a suitable option, but that stage
is quite late. Within the first few months of the pregnancy, the child is not developed enough to
withstand life on its own. It is a parasite that must thrive off of its mother. If it is an unwanted
parasite, then the mother should have the option of ridding herself of it before it is fully
developed.
Stop forcing your morals on others. Abortion isn't murder. Many people who are most likely far more
educated than you will agree. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Since you said it so absolute, I'm on this side. In cases of rape, incest, and if the life of the
mother and/or baby are at risk, it's ok. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
The baby won't even know. "ignorance is bliss". Also, it is a perfect chance for those cunts to make
something out of their lives. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
