|
It always is. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Not usually. It is usually the other way around. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Not usually. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Read the book, if there is one, it is always better. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
The first is usually better. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No way. To my mind about 2/3 of sequels fall short of the original. Granted there are some good
sequels, Aliens was much more exciting than Alien, but too often they're a let down. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I disagree! The first movie is always better when compared to it's sequels! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
No way!!!!!!! Take die hard for example, the first was the best and they went downhill from then. Or
indiana jones, the new one sucks!!! I like the classics. Terminator and predator,
the first ones were excellent. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
18 Nov 2008 19:12
Sign In
For and Against Recent Activity
