» Home » Politics
A Meat Eating Leader Is Worse Than Someone That Once Smoked Pot.
No science, no facts but true,
 Brake  08 Sep 2008 19:04
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
Your absolutely right. Someone who only smoked pot once, most likely had very little damage done to their bodies. Long term use , would be quite different.
Now a heavy meat eater, usually doesn't normally know that meat decomposes into pus in the intestines and releases all the toxins that the animal consumed. Not counting the hormones and and other chemicals people have given to these animals during their lives........mad cow...
Actually there is good science to the debate, but the media doesn't like to print it, it's bad for advertising dollars.
 
 paladen  08 Sep 2008 20:53
 5 Comments
 
 PALADEN? I took you for a clear thinker. What is this mess?

Mad cow? Exactly how many people have died from that destroyer of mankind Mad Mow disease?

Hormones and chemicals? Are their no chemicals placed on the veggies and fruits we eat?
by  Bugman
 08 Sep 2008 21:25
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Let me get this right. I have to choose between a pothead and a female? Badum cheee
 
 Specter87  24 Oct 2008 01:21
 Add a Comment
 
 
Ha,ha,ha,ha,ha
"Meat eating leader"
ha ha
 
 Stranger  01 Oct 2008 17:36
 Add a Comment
 
 
Eating meat has nothing to do with running a country, and just because Obama toked doesn't make him incompetent or stupid. He speaks a lot clearer and doesn't stutter like Mccain or Bush does that's for sure. The fact that Obama admits he smoked weed is a good sign.
 
 Carlton  29 Sep 2008 02:39
 Add a Comment
 
 
There's ABSOLUTELY NOTHING WRONG with eating meat and it CERTAINLY doesn't mean someone isn't qualified to lead a nation.
 
 ur_wrong  22 Sep 2008 23:25
 Add a Comment
 
 
No we don't want a pot head at the top of his tree running a country.
 
 keepmindok  09 Sep 2008 15:20
 Add a Comment
 
 
All things on the face of the earth are natural. Chemicals are natural. I have yet to see someone wave a magic wand and produce something. After the fall of Adam & Eve, God gave us animals for food and clothing. Maybe vegetables have brains, after all, they are living.
 
 pusspuss  09 Sep 2008 04:02
 Add a Comment
 
 
I'm against it, and I say that..Mostly because I'm neutral. I believe both things are natural and should not cause alarm. For instance, it's in our NATURE, our basic INSTINCT to be an omnivore. To eat meat AND plants. We shouldn't go against something so integral to our bodies that we have shifted features best for it.

And about the pot, I think Marijuana has too much of a negative connotation on it. Sure, you can become obsessed with it, but as for affecting your morals..No, I don't personally believe that. Just because somebody has tried pot does NOT make that person a bad one. Besides, we put much worse substances in our bodies -- Just think about it.
 
 Jaz  09 Sep 2008 01:00
 Add a Comment
 
 
Actually, medically, both can be good for you. I'm not sure what your basing your argument off of....
 
 Snowcone  08 Sep 2008 21:55
 Add a Comment
 
 
Dookie shorts!

Silly comment? Just as silly as the statement. I had to keep the comment equal to the statement.
 
 athling  08 Sep 2008 21:34
 2 Comments
 
 I like that phrase "dookie shorts". May I use it?
by  Bugman
 08 Sep 2008 21:41
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Not really. What would be worse is a warmongering psychopath, although that doesn’t seem to have been much of a drawback for Bush.
 
 Jahwobble  08 Sep 2008 21:32
 2 Comments
 
 Well, you certainly offered an engaging, well though out point to the debate. I like your unique use of facts and the thinking-man's approach you took to the whole matter.
by  Bugman
 08 Sep 2008 21:38
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Wow, what a peculiar comparison. I say false based on the biological fact the human race are omnivorous and eating meat is genuinely part of our legitimate diet, however, smoking ANYTHING (cigarette, pot, whatever) is not necessary for us biologically. So the meat eater is not doing anything worse THAN OFFENDING YOU PERSONALLY, whereas the pot smoker is actually VIOLATING THE LAWS OF SOCIETY.
 
 Grenache  08 Sep 2008 21:17
 3 Comments
 
 How is it violating the laws of society just because it does not conform to biology. More like violating the laws of nature, but even that is a tedious statement.

I agree a very peculiar comparison.
by  Kirsty08
 08 Sep 2008 21:49
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Well I'll give you some credit you were right when you stated "No Facts". Were you even thinking when you wrote this?
 
 Longhorn  08 Sep 2008 20:43
 Add a Comment
 
 
Eating meat gives menstruating females heme-iron, so it is a good thing, from that perspective. Healthier than iron-supplements, like ferrous-sulfate tablets.

Pot smoking is in youtube.com you should have a look at that. It is a video that is funny, but tells a story about drugs, and the tests they have made about what these substances do:

The youtube video is entitled: "Crackspider".

The web-structure was changed on pot, the spider built a hammock instead of a web.
People who smoke pot are lazy and fall through their hammock.
 
 Scorpion  08 Sep 2008 19:45
 2 Comments
 
 er......you do realize that that video is a joke right? its not an actual experiment. the spider didn't really build a hammock
by  blathnaid
 08 Sep 2008 21:13
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
NO. I can't see any consistency between your narrow minded proposal and the charismatic qualities one must obtain to demonstrate worthy leadership skills. The many who eat meat vastly out number the many who don't. Familiarize yourself with the real world, and stop making silly miss-judgments based on your own biased opinion. In the real world there is a food chain, organisms consume others, its a vicious cycle that continues only to pro long life on our planet.

I am also baffled on your reasoning for comparing pot and eating meat. The only factors consistent between the two are the simple facts proving, that doing them don't bring dishonesty, corruption, and any other immoral missdeeds that a narrow minded person would believe.
 
 verum  08 Sep 2008 19:38
 2 Comments
 
 The real world a growing battlefield of hate and wrongful leadership.
by  Brake
 08 Sep 2008 21:51
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Really thanks for that never knew though aliens brought such things from space. Never said anything about common labourers eating meat, or by that matter fish because that's a meat as well! So how would it make them a hypocrite.
 
 Brake  08 Sep 2008 19:19
 1 Comment
 
 I did not really understand the reply. Sincerely. I will repond To what I think your intention was.

"Common labourers"? Gee that sounds kind of elitist. It's ok for the the average man but not the president? What kind of nonsense is that?

I liked the sarcasm in the first line of your response though. Pretty funny.
by  Bugman
 08 Sep 2008 19:37
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Do you not realize the silliness of your remark? "no science, no facts, but true"? It therefore cannot be "true', only opinion. By the way, do you have ANYTHING made from leather. Shoes, belt, wallet? If you have anything made from the hides of animals, you are a hypocrite. There of course the "fish" also. If you eat the "meat" of fish...

Many animals eat meat. Are they terrible brutes also?

Silliness.
 
 Bugman  08 Sep 2008 19:13
 Add a Comment
 
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity