|
It is a self-evident truth. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
It's a person to me. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Definitely. I have sonogram pictures to prove it. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
A fetus is a living person. Life begins at conception. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Yes.
The womb is built to extricate the contents=birth. Separate entity.
The contents=Baby, has a totally separate blood-stream from Mother. Is it's own person.
With the Rights of an Own Person. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I agree with everyone on this side.... People have abortions for many reasons.. And I'm not gonna
list them all but 1 main reason is that they feel they wnt be able to cope.. And more and more
teenagers are have abortion..with today's ever growing technology and knowledge of science babies
can survive if really premature so yes it is murder in a way... The answer is NOT abortion.. The
answer is CONTRACEPTION! Who agrees? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I concure with everyone on this side |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I very firmly agree! No one has the right to take a human life. Human life is a cell mass at
first, doesn't make it less than human. A fetus is a word. The word describes the stage in which
the human is at, at a specific time in it's development. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
If it weren't a person, it wouldn't be growing. I'm not sorry to burst your bubbles. Abortion is
literal torture on a helpless being. That is sick beyond words. |
| |
 Mark  30 Apr 2008 00:33
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
A fetus, eight months old is a person, as far as I am concerned. Two days before giving birth, a
woman can still get a doctor to kill her soon-to-be baby without being prosecuted by law !
But the BIG question is : Exactly when does a fetus becomes a human being ?
In his father's testicles ? After five months in her mother"s womb ? Whenever his "premature baby"
status makes him/her viable ?
I don't know.... |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Right! If a woman doesn't want an unexpected pregnancy she shouldn't get laid at least without a
condom. Abortion should be illegal just like any other law that's not legal. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
A fetus is obviously a person of future and thus it should not be aborted in any case. Abortion is
the heartless method by which a fetus gets terminated while staying in the womb. What I feel
strongly that anybody in this world should not have the right to take a life although it would not
be born till date. I feel that a fetus is a nothing but a life and a life is always precious and why
should one kill it just only for some baseless reason? A fetus possesses as much right to live life
as a normal human being. Therefore this abortion should be banned because it is nothing but as
similar to murder. A fetus must be judged as a person of future because it is originally the unknown
individuality of coming days. Treating fetus a person would lead to the banning of abortion. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Yes, and abortion is killing that person! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Thank you for saying that! |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I agree.
It's murder.
Yes, it's still growing, it may not be fully functional, and it still relies on its mother, but so
does a one year old baby. Should mothers have the right to kill their own one year old baby just
because there may be complications, problems, or struggles with it? No! It is the same with an
unborn child.
It may be a fetus, but it is still a child. Period. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
VISIT www.Abort73.com - enough said. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
I totally agree that a foetus is a person. It may not be a full grown baby, but it is still life. As
soon as sperm fertilises an egg it is life. No ifs, no buts, that's fact because it is a cell, and
cells are life. I think that instead of abortion, women who don't want their children could give
them up for adoption. The only problem with this would be that they could form an emotional
attachment during the 9 months and not want to give up their baby anymore, which obviously could
cause problems. I don't think though that we should take away a woman's right to abort their baby -
what if they died themselves because pregnancy is too risky for them, or what if they had no other
choice for some reason or other? I think this is a very touchy subject and I have always been in the
middle with deciding whether or not abortion is right. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
In theory this is right but in the eyes of the law the situation is different so I'll agree with you
as you've stated your argument.
This is such a difficult issue. Yes that small fetus is a developing person and with scanning
techniques we know so much more about how a baby develops before birth, this has made the arguments
for abortion more difficult.
Having agreed with you I do think that there has to be some framework that protects women under some
circumstances.
If a women would die in pregnancy or childbirth then this opens up a new debate.
There was a case not so long ago where one baby had to be aborted to save a twin and this must have
been a terrible choice for those involved as I remember it was against the religious beliefs of the
parents. However once the surviving child was born they changed their view somewhat when they
realised that if the choice hadn't been made for them they would have lost both their children.
I agree that we have to give a lot of thought to the rights of these unborn children and this will
always be a very emotive debate. |
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
Scientifically speaking, a fetus is not a human being yet; it's just a big ball of cells. And the
fetus is not separated from the mother. Where the heck did you get that from? Haven't you ever
heard of a placenta, or the fact that an embryo has to attach to the mother's uterus to live, thus
NOT being separated? Since a fetus is part of the mother's body it is her decision to have an
abortion, and since her decision is based on her own beliefs, its constitutionally wrong to argue
with her. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Even if the feotus were a person, abortion should still be legal as it is it's mother's body, and
the mother has rights over her own body. You cannot possibly intend to give a feotus rights if it is
unborn and unable to comprehend what a right is at all, let alone the right to life. And speaking of
rights, what right do we have to judge any mother who wants an abortion? |
| |
|
| |
| | |
