|
Well, duh. How else are we going to take over the world; with "freedom and liberty"? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2144933190875239407
"Fabled Enemies" by Jason Bermas
This video is very well done and on point. Freelance journalism at its best. Please watch it and
be informed. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Of course it was a conspiracy, and as many theories lead us to believe it was because of oil, some
may say it was to oust the Taliban threat in Afghanistan which, by the way, was put there by America
after they supplied them with weapons to fight the Russians. If you watch the images and videos for
the 9/11 attacks you can see that explosions happened on floors below the initial impact, when it
was falling it fell as if it had been collapsed, kind of like a block of tower flats would. Yes many
would argue that because of movies and people ever growing pallets of knowledge, you could say that
they are just far fetched fiction myths. But if it was a conspiracy why then if you look at the
videos In almost every clip you'll see little puffs of dust spurting out from the sides of the
towers. There are two competing explanations for these puffs of dust: 1) the force of the collapsing
upper floors raised the air pressure in the lower ones so dramatically that it actually blew out the
windows. And 2) the towers did not collapse from the impact of two Boeing 767s and the ensuing
fires. They were destroyed in a planned, controlled demolition. The dust puffs you see on film are
the detonations of explosives planted there before the attacks. Wasn't there another plane not the
Pentagon flight but one that crashed into a field near Shanksville in rural Somerset County,
Pennsylvania, if it crashed where were all the bodies non where ever found and if you notice out of
all of the crashes this is covered the least, well in England at least, why? I think that the 9/11
was a conspiracy but what can we do, but sit at our computers and type in our thoughts? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Whom the Us People Supported... |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
The US administration is holding a smoking gun and standing over a corpse. Its efforts to stop a
thorough enquiry leave room for only one conclusion.
If 9/11 was a murder trial, the US Government a black male and the Twin Towers a white male then
just about everyone in the US would be screaming for the death penalty. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Inside job, all the way. Just search the 'net for 911 truth... |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Absolutely. 9/11 was an inside job. There are thousands of pieces of evidence to support this
supposition. If it wasn't why won't the government release pictures of the plane that "hit" the
Pentagon. Anyone that believes the 'official' story cannot think for themselves, has no critical
thinking skills, and is a lemming. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Yeah, I know Bush had intelligence about the planned suicide bombings before it happened. It could
have at least been prevented if it wasn't devised by the U.S. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
I do agree that the goverment had a role in the 9/11 terrorists attacks but i do not believe the
government fell through and performed the attack. I believe that we did help plan the attack and
even helped Al Queda with the attacks. There is just too many evidence that supports the we had a
hand in the attacks. Don't we find it a coincidence that we cant find osama bin laden. I mean really
we are the united states of America. If we really wanted to find someone, we would find them.
Hussein. Castro. List goes on.
The pentagon was the site with the most suspicion in the govt. Having something to do with
the attacks. Disappearance of plane, surveillance cameras, etc.....
Its just plain and simple too much evidence to prove that the U.S. Govt. Played a role in the
9/11 attacks. We need oil to run our country. An every day the supply of oil decreases and our
sources of oil depend on the middle eastern countries. Us being the nice nation we are would not
attack a country in order for an oil supply of our own but if we had a reason to attack a country we
could overtake a country, and then have a new oil supply that would help support the economy of the
united states.
I'm a strong supporter of our government and our nation but we never will know the truth behind
a lot of things. JFK. Area 51. The list goes on....what is the truth? |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
I don't think the government planned and carried out the "attacks" on the WTC, however, i believe
strongly that they opened all the doors and turned a blind eye to what was going to happen. I find
it curious that we are able to find a passport from one of the hijackers, even though it had to fly
out of his bag, pass through an inferno of jet fuel, and fall innocently on the sidewalk below. Yet
they couldn't find either of the 5 ton engines off of the plane that struck the pentagon or the
plane that went down in shanksville. And what do you know, right after it all happened we go to war
with Iraq, when the guy THEY accused for the attacks is still at large!! Its called false flag
terrorism. If you say it isn't possible, lest we forget the USS Maine as pretext for the
Spanish-American war, or the Reichstag fire, or how about Operation Northwoods, which was never
executed, but was planned to be used to start a war with cuba. The list could go on and on. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Come on, watch the videos, view the facts and I'm sure you will see that it did involve the
Government
The way the towers collapsed was unnatural, They were built to collapse in a certain way.
No way were they to fall flat in such a short time.
Also, where was Bush when all this was going on? He was in a classroom reading to kids - and when
told what had happened - What did he do? ... Continued to read in the class room.
Is it a coincidence the only place all the undercover secrets are kept was blown up too?
And now what happens, America can go out to war...Is it because of what happened on 9/11?
Or was it a way to get the US Army out there to attack and get oil supplies?!
You tell me... |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
The evidence for a so-called "inside job" appears fairly numerous, and alarming- the documentary
film "Loose Change", available on Google Video, offers an interesting take on what really
happened, highlighting the various doubts and indiscrepancies, and I do recommend you take the time
to watch it.
There appear to be far too many coincidences, and with the 9/11 Commission not being very effective,
there are many questions to be answered; for example, the apparent reluctance of the Government
and CIA to release actual clear footage of the plane that hit the Pentagon, despite there being
various recordings made on different cameras around the area.
For the twin towers and pentagon to have been targeted as part of an inside job is a truly
horrifying thought, and would require some sort of stretch of the imagination.
However, what can be said is that 9/11 provided George Bush and his administration the perfect
opportunity for the invasion of Afghanistan, and the whole "war on terror"; indeed, there are
several pieces of evidence to suggest that leading up to 9/11, there was knowledge of an imminent
attack, possibly even on September 11th itself, almost as if the Bush administration perhaps did
not directly cause it, but merely sat back and let it happen.
Of course, the truth could be that there was no inside job, or attempt to "sit back and let" the
terrorists do what they did.
What is clear is that there are too many questions, which those both for and against the conspiracy,
and its intricate details, have argued over. The 9/11 Commission was the medium through which all
could be laid at rest, but much was left unanswered. George Bush and Dick Cheney at first refused to
be questioned at all, and only did so due to the pressure upon them; even though they did, in the
end, testify, they did so together - Bush refused to be questioned individually.
"sudupa" also makes some valid statements, which I myself have also come across in my research.
What can be said is that 9/11 was the event that gave the Bush administration the authority and
go-ahead to invade Afghanistan, effectively beginning the "war on terror".
Unfortunately, despite the numerous questions surrounding 9/11, it's almost certain that we, the
public, will never know the truth of what really happened... |
| |
jsh4  14 Feb 2008 20:15
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
As I come to know some facts by watching the existence of some documents that the U.S. Government
was fully aware of the 9/11 attack. These documents were founded by Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, Paul
Wolfowitz and some others who are from the Bush administration system. This document was for a
project for a New American Century and there they called for a “New Pearl Harbor”. There only
intention was to get the American people to hold up a worldwide armed domination policy. Apart from
this, a lot of esteemed American newspapers reported that some of those “Hijackers” were given
their grounding US military bases in the year of 1990s. And the 9/11 commission was a complete
hypocrisy to the general people as Bush himself cut off its funds and sent his right hand man Philip
Zelikow to take charge and shape the conclusion in his favor. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
I have only this:
Www.zeitgeist.com
I hope you take the time to view this film. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
There are too many funny coincidences |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Here let me re-word myself because apparently people sit around on here for hours looking to start
drama on the Internet because they are bored, and pathetic. Anyways, YEAH I THINK IT WAS A
CONSPIRACY, JUST LIKE MANY OTHERS!
Does it look like I care?
By the way check your law, it's called liable when it's in written form, and since George W. Is a
public figure, it's dismissible in court. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Unfortunately, I believe you are right. The evidence is there. For example, there was a Project for
a New American Century document that called for a "new Pearl Harbour" to get the American people to
support a policy of global military domination. The think tank which issued this document was
founded by Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, Paul Wolfowitz and others from the Bush administration.
Several prestigious American newspapers also reported that some of the "hijackers" were being
trained at US military bases in the 1990s. The BBC has even reported that seven of the supposed
hijackers are still alive. The former foreign minister of Pakistan says he was told by the Americans
in July 2001 that they would invade Afghanistan that year before the snows came in.
If you look at the history of the 9/11 commission, it only backs up the suggestion of a conspiracy.
First, it's clear that Bush tried to prevent the commission from coming into existence. When
congressional pressure eventually forced him to agree, he starved it of funds and sent in one of his
own loyalists, Philip Zelikow, to take charge of the inquiry and shape its conclusions. The former
chairman and vice-chairman of the commission are on record as saying that they felt they were
deliberately lied to by agencies such as the CIA. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
Yes, I agree that it was a conspiracy by the US government to attack Afghanistan. The plan was to
make an army base and to occupy the oil reserves in Afghanistan. It is said that facts speak louder
than words and now the whole world knows that it was a pre-planned scheme by the US government.
This act was even protested against and disliked by the Americans. This action of the US government
and UNO was all against the laws of humanity. I am surprised that the most developed country in the
world can go so far for its benefits which can’t be justified. |
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
I believe this and think US government used this as a very good excuse to attack Iraq because they
can easily get support from the whole nation, and win simpathy from other countries. |
| |
|
| |
| | | |