» Home » Politics
9/11 Was A Conspiracy Devised By The US Government.
There Are Those Who Don't Believe The Conclusions Of The 9/11 Commission. They Insist The Attack on the World Trade Center Was A Conspiracy Initiated By The US Government.
 norefturn  07 Dec 2007 12:03
                           (What's this?)  Add to Firefox  RSS
I totally agree
 
 mawgsy  20 Nov 2009 23:45
 Add a Comment
 
 
I am indifferent.

On one side of my mind, I see "Loose Change" and I wonder about why our government hasn't released the simple facts about 9/11. The fact that it happened played in perfectly with Bush's plan to war with Iraq, like his father did before him- and it played into his company's oil wealth, and Cheney's war contractors.

But, I also have some faith in my government. I'm still a little inclined about the conspiracy, though, so I'm going to leave it at that.
 
 joredia93  30 Apr 2009 23:04
 Add a Comment
 
 
Just consider the possibility instead of thinking, "Oh, our government would NEVER do that!" How do you know? Check history.
 
 Dustin0550  11 Apr 2009 02:19
 Add a Comment
 
 
Split second before one of the planes hit the building there was a flash of what appeared to be fire or flames. What was that and why did it appear? Why was F-16's not scrambled immediately upon obtaining news of this attack? Why was there no plane wreckage debris found at the Pentagon if a jumbo jet was involved? Why was there no sign of damage to the Pentagon where the wings should have hit upon impact? Just a near perfect round hole in the building. The wingspan of a 767 stretches way out there but yet no building damage to account for it. Only the round hole that supposedly was from the fuselage impact. No jet engines were found. Way too much mighty strange goings on for me to believe otherwise.
 
 powerleg5  28 Mar 2009 01:45
 Add a Comment
 
 
Hey, why don't you watch lose change and tell me how when a plane crashs into the top of a building, somehow the bottom explodes,perfectly, first??? How in every plane crash ni history the black box that records the travel has been found, but this time????how is it that there's no video of a "plane" crashing into the pentagon????and george boi WAS caring in his fathers foot steps....u hear those pathetic attempts at a convincing speech he had....god, why couldnt that shoe of hit him square between the eyes and knock some sense into him
 
 coelho  17 Mar 2009 17:33
 Add a Comment
 
 
Yes!!!!! It was just like tupac and biggie's shootings
 
 willis94  13 Feb 2009 03:04
 Add a Comment
 
 
Of course they did. How did 2 planes knock down 3 buildings
 
 sub619  21 Jan 2009 21:55
 2 Comments
 
 you absolute idiot did you not know that the planes hit the elevator shaft in the building in other words the buildings core if you break that it is like the spine of a body the whole thing collapses the sheer force of one huge building is enough to destroy two others get some knowledge jokes
by  pooleyric
 18 Mar 2009 13:12
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I don't believe entire departments were in on it...but a small faction definitely... Right after the attacks a gag order was put on the NYFD...not to speak about what they seen or heard..But in the documentary that those two French brothers took... They are openly talking about explosions all throughout the buildings... World Trade Center Building 7 falls without getting hit... In demolision style... And Silverstein the man holding the lease on WTC was being sued 120,000. A month by the port authority for not cleaning up the asbestos... He was loosing many rents to companies moving uptown... Bill Clinton made uptown chiche..... Just the way they
turned 9/11 into targeting Bin Laden and Afghanistan to Iraq...tells you this was the agenda all along...Now whoever benefitted from this are the people who knew....
 
 cdee12120  12 Oct 2008 23:37
 Add a Comment
 
 
Whoa. A conspiracy theory isn't out of the question. I can totally agree with that. Don't doubt anything. The government is really powerful and really sneaky!
 
 imright20  09 Oct 2008 02:38
 Add a Comment
 
 
Well, duh. How else are we going to take over the world; with "freedom and liberty"?
 
 grokit  15 Sep 2008 11:38
 Add a Comment
 
 
Http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2144933190875239407

"Fabled Enemies" by Jason Bermas

This video is very well done and on point. Freelance journalism at its best. Please watch it and be informed.
 
 athling  13 Sep 2008 05:22
 Add a Comment
 
 
Of course it was a conspiracy, and as many theories lead us to believe it was because of oil, some may say it was to oust the Taliban threat in Afghanistan which, by the way, was put there by America after they supplied them with weapons to fight the Russians. If you watch the images and videos for the 9/11 attacks you can see that explosions happened on floors below the initial impact, when it was falling it fell as if it had been collapsed, kind of like a block of tower flats would. Yes many would argue that because of movies and people ever growing pallets of knowledge, you could say that they are just far fetched fiction myths. But if it was a conspiracy why then if you look at the videos In almost every clip you'll see little puffs of dust spurting out from the sides of the towers. There are two competing explanations for these puffs of dust: 1) the force of the collapsing upper floors raised the air pressure in the lower ones so dramatically that it actually blew out the windows. And 2) the towers did not collapse from the impact of two Boeing 767s and the ensuing fires. They were destroyed in a planned, controlled demolition. The dust puffs you see on film are the detonations of explosives planted there before the attacks. Wasn't there another plane not the Pentagon flight but one that crashed into a field near Shanksville in rural Somerset County, Pennsylvania, if it crashed where were all the bodies non where ever found and if you notice out of all of the crashes this is covered the least, well in England at least, why? I think that the 9/11 was a conspiracy but what can we do, but sit at our computers and type in our thoughts?
 
 laphkus99  08 Sep 2008 17:19
 Add a Comment
 
 
Whom the Us People Supported...
 
 Calvin  18 Aug 2008 02:23
 Add a Comment
 
 
The US administration is holding a smoking gun and standing over a corpse. Its efforts to stop a thorough enquiry leave room for only one conclusion.
If 9/11 was a murder trial, the US Government a black male and the Twin Towers a white male then just about everyone in the US would be screaming for the death penalty.
 
 Dawkinsfan  04 Aug 2008 14:18
 Add a Comment
 
 
Inside job, all the way. Just search the 'net for 911 truth...
 
 NinjaNurse  10 Jul 2008 22:31
 Add a Comment
 
 
Absolutely. 9/11 was an inside job. There are thousands of pieces of evidence to support this supposition. If it wasn't why won't the government release pictures of the plane that "hit" the Pentagon. Anyone that believes the 'official' story cannot think for themselves, has no critical thinking skills, and is a lemming.
 
 HopeSAT  18 Jun 2008 01:19
 3 Comments
 
 Name one piece of evidence.
by  bishop
 18 Jun 2008 01:54
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Yeah, I know Bush had intelligence about the planned suicide bombings before it happened. It could have at least been prevented if it wasn't devised by the U.S.
 
 mastermov  28 May 2008 22:26
 6 Comments
 
 How are you so sure? CNN? That explains a lot.
by  XieXie
 28 May 2008 22:28
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I do agree that the goverment had a role in the 9/11 terrorists attacks but i do not believe the government fell through and performed the attack. I believe that we did help plan the attack and even helped Al Queda with the attacks. There is just too many evidence that supports the we had a hand in the attacks. Don't we find it a coincidence that we cant find osama bin laden. I mean really we are the united states of America. If we really wanted to find someone, we would find them. Hussein. Castro. List goes on.
The pentagon was the site with the most suspicion in the govt. Having something to do with the attacks. Disappearance of plane, surveillance cameras, etc.....
Its just plain and simple too much evidence to prove that the U.S. Govt. Played a role in the 9/11 attacks. We need oil to run our country. An every day the supply of oil decreases and our sources of oil depend on the middle eastern countries. Us being the nice nation we are would not attack a country in order for an oil supply of our own but if we had a reason to attack a country we could overtake a country, and then have a new oil supply that would help support the economy of the united states.
I'm a strong supporter of our government and our nation but we never will know the truth behind a lot of things. JFK. Area 51. The list goes on....what is the truth?
 
 UNC1saac  16 Apr 2008 06:12
 Add a Comment
 
 
I don't think the government planned and carried out the "attacks" on the WTC, however, i believe strongly that they opened all the doors and turned a blind eye to what was going to happen. I find it curious that we are able to find a passport from one of the hijackers, even though it had to fly out of his bag, pass through an inferno of jet fuel, and fall innocently on the sidewalk below. Yet they couldn't find either of the 5 ton engines off of the plane that struck the pentagon or the plane that went down in shanksville. And what do you know, right after it all happened we go to war with Iraq, when the guy THEY accused for the attacks is still at large!! Its called false flag terrorism. If you say it isn't possible, lest we forget the USS Maine as pretext for the Spanish-American war, or the Reichstag fire, or how about Operation Northwoods, which was never executed, but was planned to be used to start a war with cuba. The list could go on and on.
 
 cstrand31  10 Apr 2008 08:54
 Add a Comment
 
 
Come on, watch the videos, view the facts and I'm sure you will see that it did involve the Government

The way the towers collapsed was unnatural, They were built to collapse in a certain way.
No way were they to fall flat in such a short time.

Also, where was Bush when all this was going on? He was in a classroom reading to kids - and when told what had happened - What did he do? ... Continued to read in the class room.

Is it a coincidence the only place all the undercover secrets are kept was blown up too?

And now what happens, America can go out to war...Is it because of what happened on 9/11?
Or was it a way to get the US Army out there to attack and get oil supplies?!

You tell me...
 
 L-S-E  19 Feb 2008 14:36
 4 Comments
 
 Exactly L-S-E, and many people are unaware of these unanswered questions. Something like "Loose Change" really does open your eyes, and I think everyone deserves to know about these apparent coincidences and mysteries surrounding 9/11, to form their own opinion.

I'm not saying 9/11 was a cover-up, exactly how much was known by Bush and his Government cannot be said, but the fact is that these coincidences and unanswered questions are evident and do exist, and people deserve to know this.

The 9/11 Commission after all, was pretty much a farce. It really angers me that nothing is really being done to put this all at rest, and it is unlikely that anything substantial will ever be done.
by  jsh4
 19 Feb 2008 23:28
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
The evidence for a so-called "inside job" appears fairly numerous, and alarming- the documentary film "Loose Change", available on Google Video, offers an interesting take on what really happened, highlighting the various doubts and indiscrepancies, and I do recommend you take the time to watch it.

There appear to be far too many coincidences, and with the 9/11 Commission not being very effective, there are many questions to be answered; for example, the apparent reluctance of the Government and CIA to release actual clear footage of the plane that hit the Pentagon, despite there being various recordings made on different cameras around the area.

For the twin towers and pentagon to have been targeted as part of an inside job is a truly horrifying thought, and would require some sort of stretch of the imagination.

However, what can be said is that 9/11 provided George Bush and his administration the perfect opportunity for the invasion of Afghanistan, and the whole "war on terror"; indeed, there are several pieces of evidence to suggest that leading up to 9/11, there was knowledge of an imminent attack, possibly even on September 11th itself, almost as if the Bush administration perhaps did not directly cause it, but merely sat back and let it happen.

Of course, the truth could be that there was no inside job, or attempt to "sit back and let" the terrorists do what they did.

What is clear is that there are too many questions, which those both for and against the conspiracy, and its intricate details, have argued over. The 9/11 Commission was the medium through which all could be laid at rest, but much was left unanswered. George Bush and Dick Cheney at first refused to be questioned at all, and only did so due to the pressure upon them; even though they did, in the end, testify, they did so together - Bush refused to be questioned individually. "sudupa" also makes some valid statements, which I myself have also come across in my research.

What can be said is that 9/11 was the event that gave the Bush administration the authority and go-ahead to invade Afghanistan, effectively beginning the "war on terror".

Unfortunately, despite the numerous questions surrounding 9/11, it's almost certain that we, the public, will never know the truth of what really happened...
 
 jsh4  14 Feb 2008 20:15
 Add a Comment
 
 
As I come to know some facts by watching the existence of some documents that the U.S. Government was fully aware of the 9/11 attack. These documents were founded by Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, Paul Wolfowitz and some others who are from the Bush administration system. This document was for a project for a New American Century and there they called for a “New Pearl Harbor”. There only intention was to get the American people to hold up a worldwide armed domination policy. Apart from this, a lot of esteemed American newspapers reported that some of those “Hijackers” were given their grounding US military bases in the year of 1990s. And the 9/11 commission was a complete hypocrisy to the general people as Bush himself cut off its funds and sent his right hand man Philip Zelikow to take charge and shape the conclusion in his favor.
 
 sudipa  06 Feb 2008 04:33
 Add a Comment
 
 
I have only this:

Www.zeitgeist.com

I hope you take the time to view this film.
 
 The_Alex  01 Feb 2008 04:10
 1 Comment
 
 I have watched this film and found it to be a good way to support the other side of the story.
by  123
 20 Jul 2008 05:38
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
There are too many funny coincidences
 
 gcm65  23 Jan 2008 12:10
 Add a Comment
 
 
Here let me re-word myself because apparently people sit around on here for hours looking to start drama on the Internet because they are bored, and pathetic. Anyways, YEAH I THINK IT WAS A CONSPIRACY, JUST LIKE MANY OTHERS!



Does it look like I care?

By the way check your law, it's called liable when it's in written form, and since George W. Is a public figure, it's dismissible in court.
 
 baconbust  22 Jan 2008 01:09
 Add a Comment
 
Comment
  
 
Unfortunately, I believe you are right. The evidence is there. For example, there was a Project for a New American Century document that called for a "new Pearl Harbour" to get the American people to support a policy of global military domination. The think tank which issued this document was founded by Dick Cheney, Jeb Bush, Paul Wolfowitz and others from the Bush administration.

Several prestigious American newspapers also reported that some of the "hijackers" were being trained at US military bases in the 1990s. The BBC has even reported that seven of the supposed hijackers are still alive. The former foreign minister of Pakistan says he was told by the Americans in July 2001 that they would invade Afghanistan that year before the snows came in.

If you look at the history of the 9/11 commission, it only backs up the suggestion of a conspiracy. First, it's clear that Bush tried to prevent the commission from coming into existence. When congressional pressure eventually forced him to agree, he starved it of funds and sent in one of his own loyalists, Philip Zelikow, to take charge of the inquiry and shape its conclusions. The former chairman and vice-chairman of the commission are on record as saying that they felt they were deliberately lied to by agencies such as the CIA.
 
 Hidell  09 Jan 2008 14:45
 Add a Comment
 
 
Yes, I agree that it was a conspiracy by the US government to attack Afghanistan. The plan was to make an army base and to occupy the oil reserves in Afghanistan. It is said that facts speak louder than words and now the whole world knows that it was a pre-planned scheme by the US government.

This act was even protested against and disliked by the Americans. This action of the US government and UNO was all against the laws of humanity. I am surprised that the most developed country in the world can go so far for its benefits which can’t be justified.
 
 cancer11  07 Dec 2007 15:48
 4 Comments
 
 What I'm asking is, do you think the US government was responsible for the attack on the WTC? Conspiracy theorists think it was.
by  norefturn
 08 Dec 2007 04:42
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I believe this and think US government used this as a very good excuse to attack Iraq because they can easily get support from the whole nation, and win simpathy from other countries.
 
 hitomi  07 Dec 2007 13:57
 1 Comment
 
 What I'm asking is, do you think the US government was responsible for the attack on the WTC? Conspiracy theorists think it was.
by  norefturn
 08 Dec 2007 04:43
Comment
  
Comment
  
Right, sure it was, just the same way that the Holocaust was devised by Jews.
 
 dlmiller82  03 Sep 2009 22:08
 Add a Comment
 
 
I'm afraid, America, that you were attacked. I'm afraid 19 people got past you that day - get over that fact, and stop blaming a government which was just a bit too quick to use the attacks to go after a group of people. By invading Afghanistan AND Iraq Bush was simply overcompensating for not being able to stop the attacks in the first place.
 
 joseph2166  11 May 2009 08:52
 Add a Comment
 
 
Moron only believe that trash
 
 millerco  06 May 2009 07:25
 Add a Comment
 
 
Where on earth do you get this idea from?? I don't see how this theory could work. Why would the American government want to put the whole country in danger. Stupid.
 
 Lynchee  26 Apr 2009 17:44
 Add a Comment
 
 
Why would the government kill all of those people and destroy those buildings? We didn't need to invade the Middle East for oil, we can just buy it. Besides, that would result in lots of American soilders dying.

It also seems insulting to the families of those who died to say that 9/11 was a conspirisy.
 
 Spartan33  22 Nov 2008 01:15
 Add a Comment
 
 
9/11 videos have been procured and showed publicly. Also live testimonies have been submitted. If it was a conspiracy then I am a Thanksgiving turkey!
 
 Feremeir1  22 Nov 2008 01:11
 1 Comment
 
 of course the govnt is going to have witness...they have people to spare
by  coelho
 06 Apr 2009 21:31
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Yeah, the US Government can be a bit on the idiotic side but what a JOKE!! Of course its not an inside job, who the hell would plot to bomb part of their own country when they're the head of it?? Save a few dictators in history i could think of. But seriously, Osama Bin Laden ADMITTED to it and America are AT WAR because of it.
 
 Emilie  15 Nov 2008 23:09
 Add a Comment
 
 
Typical un-supported pipe dreams from the imagination of the far left... Take a look at Penn & Tellers logic

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kcrF346sS_I
 
 rexray  17 Oct 2008 13:57
 Add a Comment
 
 
Oh yes, next, let's nuke Baltimore! It makes perfect sense that we attack ourselves!
 
 yu_yevin  15 Oct 2008 00:23
 Add a Comment
 
 
Why would they attack both towers AND the pentagon? Just the towers and maybe even only one of them would have been enough of an excuse to go to war.

And as for the evidence that the towers wouldn't have fallen just from planes crashing into them (i've heard people say there must have been bombs planted in the towers) who's to say that the government planted the bombs and not the terrorists?

I agree with K9 that the gov't may have known ahead of time, but didn't actively participate.
 
 ur_wrong  29 Sep 2008 05:15
 Add a Comment
 
 
Just like the Holocaust never happened, we never landed on the moon, JFK wasn't killed by LHO? Cmon people get a grip
 
 Carlton  29 Sep 2008 02:07
 Add a Comment
 
 
I think this is absurd,although i will say it did give the people in power a reason to advance allot of their own personal agenda.
 
 billbill38  07 Sep 2008 02:39
 Add a Comment
 
 
This is one of those things that will stay a conspiracy forever because no-one knows the full truth. I remember watching a program about it saying that the towers were rigged to blow with explosives and that the planes were holograms. Complete bullshit, but people can believe what they want to. Although it is funny, it happened on the 11th of the 9th, but Americans write it the other way, and 911 is their number for the emergency services.
 
 Tromanator  05 Sep 2008 14:23
 Add a Comment
 
 
I don't think it was but if it was it sure unified a country.
 
 Krahner  18 Aug 2008 05:16
 1 Comment
 
 Yeah, for about a week...
by  grokit
 22 Sep 2008 05:57
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Wow.
This was definitely NOT an inside job.
A mirage of people seem to assume that it was because osama bin laden was close with our government.
Why would our government want to do this.
The world trade center was a source of business.
When that ended hundreds of people were jobless.prices went up. So bosses could pay they're new workers.
EVERYTHING changed and not for the better.
I for one.
Think that assumption is stupid, and the government would never risk so much.
As for their refusal to release specific pictures of that day, there must be a good reason.

Such as, to stop assumptions lie this.
The more people try to know, the more they THINK they know. Which, wrecks complete havoc.
 
 justjay  11 Aug 2008 06:26
 Add a Comment
 
 
First off let me say i used to live in manhatten when it happened and my 2 uncles worked on the top level of tower 2

it was a cool view up their

now an inside job i don't think so if it was why they tell osada bin ladin to hire 19 men hijack it and hit the the towers(the WORLDS AND USAS BIGEST CORRPERATIONS WERE EVERY THING WAS FOR BUIZNESSES) think REATARD that would never happen.then the PENNTIGON ya write AND I go number 2 MONEY

THINK ABOUT IT
 
 cjbulls1  06 Aug 2008 20:55
 Add a Comment
 
 
This makes me laugh. The things conspiracy nuts cite as "proof" is ludicrous.

Example: "If it wasn't why won't the government release pictures of the plane that "hit" the Pentagon." While this may sound like a legitimate item to ponder, doesn't the fact that hundreds of citizens saw the plane crash into the building convince you?

Example: Its just plain and simple too much evidence to prove that the U.S. Govt. Played a role in the 9/11 attacks. We need oil to run our country. Do you realize that with ANWR, the Continental Shelf, shale-oil in the Rockies, Coal and natural gas that we have TENFOLD what the Saudi's do in energy? Even if one were to beleive that Bush, Chaney, et al were so ruthless as to do ANYTHING to get more oil that they would simply set-up a few Democratic congressmen in awkward situations and blackmail them to lift the moratorium on drilling? Not only that, but if I'm to believe your assertion that oil was the motive for the Iraq war, why hasn't our big evil government so much as asked for an exclusive or semi-exclusive oil deal from Iraq. Hell, we don't even have exclusive dibs to buy oil from Iraq at the market price!

MOST ludicrous is this assertion: That somehow the government found dozens of men trained in the demolition of large skyscrapers, snuck them into the buildings, had them complete what would have been at least a couple of days worth of work that would have had to included large loud construction machinery, snuck them out again, and then orchestrated explosions that were simultaneous to the impact of the planes. Oh, and all of these men kept their secrets.

The fact of the matter is this: No analysis was ever done on how buildings of that nature will fall if there structural integrity is violated by AIRPLANES. Studies are done about earthquakes, wind, steel failure, normal fire (not the kind fueled by jetfuel), etc,, but they were NOT done concerning the affects of airliners crashing into them. Before 9-11 it was unheard of.

As for the assertion that the administration knew that bin-Laden wanted to strike the US, I say "DUH". Here's some other newsflash items: Ted Kennedy plans on having a cocktail after work, it's not wise to hunt with Dick Chaney, and Jessica Simpson isn't that bright.

If you want to say that the president's administration used the 9-11 situation to their advantage to invade Afghanistan and Iraq, I would disagree, but at least it's a valid, logic-based arguement. This conspiracy is absurd, baseless, and actually a little pathetic. I wonder how many of you that posted on that side are at ComiCon today.
 
 cds69  11 Jul 2008 20:08
 2 Comments
 
 cds69,

The first example you use, "If it wasn't why won't the government release pictures of the plane that "hit" the Pentagon?" is relative because you're talking about hearsay; who are these people that claimed to have seen the plane hit the Pentagon? And why is it that everyone glorifies the people that were in the Pentagon and died when the plane hit, but not the actual people that were on the plane? And how come there is no video that shows the plane hitting the Pentagon? There were a few cameras, especially traffic cameras, that could have been released, showing the plane flying over the road because of how low it was. I'm not saying this was a conspiracy, but d*mn if it doesn't sound iffy...
by  Damien
 18 Sep 2008 16:32
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I trust the government and what they do
 
 kingbaddog  10 Jul 2008 00:46
 1 Comment
 
 You trust Bush even though he said there were WMD and there weren't? Isn't that a bit naive?
by  Hidell
 10 Jul 2008 01:34
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I've found some of the conspiracy arguments very interesting and compelling. Ironically I don't buy into it because I don't believe our power elite have their act together enough to be able to coordinate and pull that off. And if they had planned this type of attack there are plenty of other targets they could have used to motivate our public and get the outcome desired without having to take down the twin towers. Plus they would have had much better fabricated evidence on hand to be able to implicate Iraq somehow in addition to Alqaeda.
 
 Grenache  09 Jul 2008 20:47
 Add a Comment
 
 
That's really stupid. Seriously, why would the government take out the trade centers. It made them more money than any other single building in the country. When that building was taken down our economy went to the crapper
 
 raiderfan9  08 May 2008 13:57
 3 Comments
 
 You are naive. The WTC towers were full of asbestos and were REQUIRED to do an abatement that was estimated to cost 2 billion dollars. The lease holder on the WTC insured the complex of buildings for 2 billion dollars 6 weeks before the towers came down. His policy included,"terrorist attacks with an aircraft flying into the building." Look it up. Don't believe me. WTC 7 contained many federal agancies, including the SEC which had the ONLY records for several lawsuits which would have cost corporate Americe BILLIONS of $$. Funny how it fell in on it's own footprint and wasn't even hit by a plane... Towers 1,2 and bldg 7 are the ONLY steel framed contruction buildings to EVER collapse after fire. 9/11 was an inside job. Bury the evidence and create a reason to invade 2 oil-rich countries. Do your homework and quit being a lemming.
by  HopeSAT
 18 Jun 2008 01:28
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
No? Why would they bomb their own country?
 
 lavatis  08 May 2008 13:51
 2 Comments
 
 Ever heard of the Reichstag fire? Hitler burnt down his own gov't building to scare the country into changing the laws and making him Chancellor and eventually Der Fuhrer. You remember Nazi Germany don't you?
by  HopeSAT
 18 Jun 2008 01:33
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
The terrorists "belief" and "religion" is what caused it. We as a planet have to change our "belief system" to prevent "behavior" that hurts each other. Until then more chaos will follow. Our "beliefs" are outdated and destructive.
 
 Manga58  03 May 2008 15:45
 1 Comment
 
 Stop listening to Faux News and pick up a book. Read. Something. Islamic terrorists are no different than any other kind of terrorist. You know who invented the "suicide bomber" trick? Jews. Hundreds of years ago. Right-to-Lifers who bomb abortion clinics and kill doctors are terrorists too. Terror is a tactic. A tactic you use when "usual means" don't work. It is criminal and the people that do such acts should be prosecuted.
by  HopeSAT
 18 Jun 2008 01:37
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
If you see someone raping your daughter and you do nothing to stop it, does that make you a participant? No, but it would make you one sick sack of faces.

Bush, Cheney, Rice, Perle, Wolfowitz, Kristol, Rove and the other excuses for human beings knew the 9/11 attacks were coming. There were warned of it by the CIA.

Bush and the other neo-convicts knew it was coming.
They let it happen.
 
 K9  01 May 2008 17:50
 3 Comments
 
 Correct.
by  The_Alex
 08 May 2008 04:36
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Why would they want to go to war?
Because their bored?
 
 im_trumpet  22 Apr 2008 20:16
 1 Comment
 
 For oil. Read a newspaper. Turn of your TV. Check the internet. Start thinking for yourself.
by  HopeSAT
 18 Jun 2008 01:39
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Why would the gov. Make up a deadly excuse like that to put us at war? You're freaking nuts buddy!
 
 celva_olva  18 Apr 2008 21:06
 2 Comments
 
 It is called wagging the dog. A mere distraction. Do you remember the reason we went into Iraq? WMDs, right? Oh, no, wait. It was to get rid of Saddam. Oh, that's not it either. It is to bring democracy to the Middle East. Our pretext for invasion has changed SO many times it is unreal.
by  The_Alex
 08 May 2008 04:35
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
We all let our guard down when it came to 9-11. We knew it would happen but we didn't know when and where. We cant always blame the government for the bad things that goes wrong... What are we going to start blaming the government bc your girlfriend broke up with you GET REAL!
 
 sexyjesse  18 Apr 2008 15:45
 Add a Comment
 
 
I would not be surprised if there were Americans involved... But the American government? As a whole? Even top branch?... The only thing that pokes a whole in my skepticism is bush's very cool, but... No i don't think that
 
 characters  16 Apr 2008 08:12
 2 Comments
 
 Especially the top branch. The stand-down order given to NORAD and other branches of the military comes directly from the President himself. No other branch of government can order a stand-down like that; the the President is the commander in chief, after all.
by  The_Alex
 08 May 2008 04:39
Comment
  
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
I don't believe the U.S. Government had anything to do with devising the plans for 9/11, but I do believe they knew it was going to happen. I Believe Republicans are all for war and disasters. They let 9/11 happen to get the Americans to believe in a cause for fighting the terrorists. Republicans cannot be trusted. In fact, government itself cannot be trusted.
 
 demo  31 Mar 2008 03:45
 1 Comment
 
 Yeah, I'd bet Bush hides his horns under his hair.
by  Homestar
 26 Apr 2009 17:52
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Somehow, I doubt the United States government collapsed their own World Trade Center, harming business, opening the gates for more terror attacks, putting us in a vulnerable state of emergency and killing 2,752 people in cold blood. I do not see what we stand to gain from such an attack.
 
 veggiefry  29 Mar 2008 14:50
 1 Comment
 
 Would you rather loose 2000 something people or go into another but yet greater depression than before. We need oil basically to run our country. So what would you choose?
by  UNC1saac
 17 Apr 2008 03:35
Comment
  
Comment
  
 
Of course the government didn't do it. People are just too secure in their safe little lives to fathom the idea that a group of people from another country would dare to attack them in their happy little homes. Sadly, it is much easier for some people to believe that their own government would do these things than it is to believe a terrorist group did it.

Like another poster said, you take a bunch of exaggerated facts, rearrange some "evidence" to suit your reasonings, get some "credible" resources to back you up, throw in some big words that the average person won't be able to understand, and you can "prove" this conspiracy to be correct. However, no one stops to think that a government who would be willing to do such a thing would be risking losing their entire country to a revolution or attack and liberation from allied nations. And if they were to do such a thing, they'd sure as hell make sure it was done in a manner that no brat college students could figure it out.
 
 Sonic-X14  15 Mar 2008 23:43
 Add a Comment
 
 
They can't get simple tasks right how could they do something that intricate right
 
 msc7683  10 Mar 2008 21:52
 Add a Comment
 
 
Could be another Reichstag fire scenario though i doubt it.
 
 sensai80  09 Mar 2008 02:06
 Add a Comment
 
 
6 More Responses
Sign In / Sign Up
 For and Against Recent Activity
Related Debates
Democrats Should Raise The Songbird Issue In Response To The Repugnican Obama Terrorist Ploy
McDonald's Should Stop Hiring Teenagers And Young Adults Altogether In Favor Of Hiring Low Wage Immigrant...
This Year's Democratic Nomination Will Be Decided By The Super-delegates
(UK) MPs Shouldn't Be Allowed Expenses
The USA Will Be Classified As A Socialist Society Within The Next Eight Years
Communism Is A Bad Thing
You Should Die For Your Country
People Who Want To Help The Poor Are Welcome To Do It. Just Open Up Your Own Wallets And Put Your Money...
Obama Is The Guy With The Key To This Fall's Election
Government Interference Should Be Stopped
New Debates
Is Halloween Better Then Christmas?
They Should Relax The Language Censor A Bit.
A Little Bit Of Flooding In England Shouldn't Be Called "flooding Of Biblical Proportions"
H1N1: A Real Mystery
Edward (vampire) Is Better Than Jacob (wolf)!! TWILIGHT!!
There Is Nothing Remotely Attractive About Johnny Depp.
There Will Never Be World Peace
Degrassi Is A Good Show!!
We Should Not Be Required To Learn Spanish In School.
Islam Is Inherently More Pernicious Than Christianity